15

Biden Admin Unveils Toughest-Ever Car Emissions Rule in Bid to Force EV Purchases and Eliminate Free Ability to Travel. Let's Go Brandon.

Posted by freedomforall 2 years ago to Politics
62 comments | Share | Flag

Paid Article content:
"President Joe Biden further accelerated the nation’s switch to electric vehicles by announcing two proposed federal rule changes aimed at reducing greenhouse gasses and other pollutants in motor vehicle emissions.

The changes, announced April 12, would affect virtually all gasoline-powered vehicles on U.S. highways, would save consumers an estimated $12,000 in fuel and maintenance costs over the life of a vehicle, and avoid almost 10 billion tons of carbon dioxide emissions through 2055, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The move aims to further the president’s goal of having 50 percent of all new cars and light trucks and 30 percent of new medium- and heavy-duty trucks sold in 2030 be zero-emission vehicles. Electric vehicles (EVs) are considered zero-emission vehicles.

The EPA estimates that approval of these rules would result in 67 percent of new passenger vehicles and light trucks would be EVs by 2032, along with 50 percent of busses, 35 percent of short-haul freight tractors, and 25 percent of long-haul freight tractors.

Critics have claimed that the move will increase the price of new cars and was made without consideration of the ability of the nation’s supply chain to meet this demand.

The Biden administration has spent some $31 billion on the development of so-called clean transportation over the last two years, including the development of a network of EV charging stations, improving the supply chain for materials needed to produce EV batteries, and making loans to companies manufacturing EVs and components in the United States.

Meanwhile, American car manufacturers and a number of states have been voluntarily moving the market toward electric-powered vehicles.

General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis announced in 2021 that they would aim to reach EV sales of at least 40 percent of all new vehicle sales by 2030.

The rule change comes 10 months after six major automakers pledged to stop selling gas and diesel-powered cars worldwide by 2040.

In November 2021, Ford, General Motors, Mercedes-Benz, Volvo, and Jaguar Land Rover pledged to stop selling diesel-powered cars worldwide by 2040.

In 2022, the state of Washington followed California in announcing a ban on the sale of new gasoline-powered cars in the state by 2035.

Washington enacted a law in 2020 to follow California’s vehicle emissions standards. Connecticut, Colorado, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington D.C. have also adopted California’s vehicle emission standards.

GOP Reaction
Republican lawmakers immediately criticized the announcement.

“First President Biden came for our gas stoves. Now he wants to ban the cars we drive,” said Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), ranking member of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

“His misguided policies are hurting American families while helping China. The president’s disastrous energy transition is making us more reliant on our enemies while driving up prices for Americans. The ‘electrification of everything’ is not a solution. It’s a road to higher prices and fewer choices.”

“Today, the Biden administration made clear it wants to decide for Americans what kinds of cars and trucks we are allowed to buy, lease, and drive,” Sen. Shelly Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) wrote on Twitter.

She added that the Biden administration “did not consider that the average price of an electric vehicle was roughly $65,000 last year, more than the household income of 46 percent of American families.


Auto Industry
Automakers around the world have announced plans to invest $1.2 trillion in creating EVs by 2030, according to the Alliance for Innovative Innovation. Yet even that may not be enough to meet the aggressive goals set by the Biden administration.

The number of charging stations is currently insufficient to meet demand, the Alliance noted in an April 6 statement. Of the nation’s 3,100 counties, 39 percent had no chargers installed as of 2022, and 63 percent had five or fewer.

Minerals needed to supply the battery market may also be in short supply, according to the Alliance. North America is projected to produce only about 3.5 percent of the supply needed by 2030, which could increase dependence on China if the situation is not altered, the statement said.

Automakers are committed to the shift to EVs, the Alliance stated, but how fast that shift will happen largely depends on factors outside their control.

“The question isn’t whether it can be done, it’s how fast can it be done … and how fast will depend almost exclusively on having the right policies and market conditions in place to achieve the shared goal of a net zero carbon automotive future,” the group stated."
---------------------------------------------------
Personally, I plan to violate as many federal laws (that punish people without any regard to someone being harmed) as possible regarding my personal vehicle.
I have no respect whatever for the EPA or any other federal agency.
I do not consent to be your slave, looting scum.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by tutor-turtle 2 years ago
    Not an effing word about:
    A) Where the power comes from? Answer: Hydrocarbons DUH! So much for zero emissions.
    B) Expansion and modernization of the distribution network.

    My neighborhood became electrified around the turn of the century. Last century. Same wires, same transformers.
    Most of my neighbors houses have knob & tube wiring. (bare wire running through ceramic insulating tubes, spaced about 6" apart. No grounds) I have the modern stuff! 1930's armored cabling (AC). Again, no grounding, unless you count the sheathing as a ground, it makes for a very poor conductor. GFI's won't work with AC. Unless they had a major renovation, we all have 4, count 'em, four, screw-in-type 15 amp fuses, for a grand total of 60 amps. This is almost always the case for home built before WWII. Unless they have had major renovations (all the walls torn out and the out-dated wiring replaced.)

    To say the TraitorJoe is stupid-on-a-pogostick is giving him credit he doesn't deserve.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 2 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Me dino has one whole big .50-cal. bullet but nothing to shoot it with.
    It just stands on a shelf with a collection of other bullets showing off its superior might. .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 2 years ago
    +1 👍🏻 I understand the sentiment and intention of the Resident. No offense but I do not want to read what he is trying to do. We are at War and we are going to win . Try as they might it ain’t going to happen.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by tutor-turtle 2 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Coal-fired EV's
    You can't make this shit up if you tried.

    TraitorJoe's job is to destroy this country, unless we destroy him first.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mikeofallon 2 years ago
    The biased, corrupt Brandon admin will only consider "tailpipe emissions", NOT TOTAL emissions & the dino power required to keep EVs running. Expanding the grid, 85% dino charging stations, Battery life cycle, vehicle recycling. What's the human time cost for charging & grid outages??
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 2 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Oh, I don't know, FFA. Don't you think the government would subsidize the batteries to point where they would be "free"? Bwaaaaaa ha ha ha!!!!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 2 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, a solution (ignoring the expense of creating a lot more electric infrastructure)
    could be a standard battery "bank" for all EV's.
    Stop and swap a dead battery for a charged battery and be on your way.
    Government would like to design that, I'm sure.
    Each battery would cost $100,000 and weigh 10 tons.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 2 years ago in reply to this comment.
    You owe me a massive Biden-sized ice cream cone.
    Uh, wait, wait, wait.
    Never mind! Never mind!
    Just had a vision that won't let me enjoy it.
    As Nero played a harp (fiddles weren't invented yet) as Rome burned, I just saw Joey surrounded by drag queens and happily licking ice cream as the USA collapsed all around him.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Markus_Katabri 2 years ago
    This is going to be great entertainment. Can’t wait. Me and my 1996 F-250 are ready.
    There may actually be a market for getting high miles old vehicles out of the south and west to rebuild and sell.
    A 1990s Ford F-150 with a manual transmission and a straight six is about as bullet proof as they get.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 2 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Living in Upstate NY I know what you mean. Especially after a lake effect snow.

    I just had a thought pop in my head. That is a "pony express" EV rental business. You rent an EV where you live, drive it to the 3/4 mark station, trade it for a charged EV (and hopefully thoroughly cleaned) to finish the trip to your wife's family without having to wait on a charge. Same thing on the way back or wherever else you want to go. Hmmmm, if properly engineered you won't have to change cars if the batteries can be popped in and out quickly. (See? You will never need to own a car and you'll be happy!) LOL!

    Edit add: I'm sure the government will find a way to tax and regulate such a business out of existence because such a business would undermine the whole purpose of keeping us serfs at home.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 2 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Interestingly, I just watched a video this morning of a congressional hearing from 3/28 where top Bureaucrats of the EPA were asked by a Republican representative how much CO2 was currently in the atmosphere. Of the 5 or 6 individuals squirming in their seats none knew the answer. When pressed for a guess they answered from 4 to 8 percent. They were then informed the current level was just under 0.04% and under 0.02% is when plant life on earth starts to die off, especially food crops. Remember, these are the taxpayer's exorbitantly overpaid "experts" that are setting the standards the rest of us have to genuflect to.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 2 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I once asked my dad's very liberal widow, "So, does global warming create floods or droughts?" Her answer, "Both!" Haha...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 2 years ago
    The quest for an all-electric-car population is all about control and has nothing to do with the environment. Add to that the constant, overall quest for more and more governing that I've seen in every governmental/regulation group I've ever interfaced with - (think the recent desire to do away with all gas ranges). None of this makes any sense and it's typical of Biden to want to remove something without offering an equally effective replacement (shut down the oil industry with zero mention of building a bunch of nuclear plants...)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 2 years ago
    Get ready for a repeat of the late 1960's and 1970's when the epa mandated emission reductions. It resulted in disastrous car design for that period until manufacturers figured out a way (at our expense really) to use smaller engines, fuel injection, and lighter cars to squeak by the regulations. By the time 2000 rolled around, people started buying less regulated pickups and suv's and big engines returned.

    Now we are going to see a repeat where the ICE cars will be smaller, more expensive, perform less well and generally be less attractive. The EV's will take over, no matter if they are less desirable and more expensive, and need expensive infrastructure.

    No one is talking about how the electricity will be produced, stored, and distributed, but taxpayers will foot the bill on that, I am sure. Solar production is daylight dependent and doesnt work in most of the country. Do people NOT drive at night then?

    Stupid government is at it again. We need to stop depending on government to solve our problems. They only make MORE problems.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by katrinam41 2 years ago
    A hybrid I can see working and reducing the so-called human-created pollution. An all-electric vehicle is not practical or feasible at this point, with my fellow Gulchers making a solid list of why it won't fly. I don't believe we are the cause of global warming. Or was it global cooling. Are we headed for a desert or a glacier? Depends on what the tyranny is trying to force down our throats at the moment, although a much cruder way of putting it is more accurate. BOHICA.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 2 years ago
    These are ridiculous rules whose real goal is to reduce the mobility of the People in general. A mobile population is harder to control.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ pixelate 2 years ago
    In the end, physics always wins over politics.
    This electric car push is not going to happen and it's So Far down the Road that the people who legislated the push will not be around when the physics and reality become apparent.
    In the meantime, we will experience the pain inflicted on the general population by the absurd legislators and the state-compensated corporate shills that attend to the fascist dictates.
    I am with you FFA -- taking steps to violate stupid laws whenever I find it practical.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Ben_C 2 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I am 77 and still working. In 2013 I bought a Lincoln MKX which now has 140K miles on it. Only maintenance expenses and a minor door ding. Third set of tires. FJB
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Ben_C 2 years ago in reply to this comment.
    My thoughts exactly. It may get very ugly before it gets better. And to think Brandon is sending all of the military's assets to Ukraine.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo