Taking into account recent Wisconsin state supreme court loss, WSJ editors warn GOP swing-state hopefuls to tread softly on abortion issue as leftist judge spearheaded her victory on the issue
Posted by bubah1mau 1 year ago to Government
"... The judge focused her campaign largely on abortion, hammering Wisconsin’s near outright abortion ban that Republicans would not amend, according to the WSJ editorial board. Protasiewicz’ victory proves that abortion is still front of mind for voters and could be a determining factor in 2024, according to the WSJ editorial board.
The Republicans must shift their pro-life policies, as an outright abortion ban is not popular among voters in swing states, the WSJ editorial board argued. The abortion issue could result in another GOP loss in the 2024 presidential election if they don’t lessen their restrictions."
Trump warned about the same thing concerning the many losses in the midterm elections. He said the abortion issue was "mishandled" by many of those who lost.
Problem is, you can't sell women (and many men) on the idea that an embryo or fetus is a "person" until it's born and physically separate from the mother. It would be far better to concentrate on defunding all government (tax-paid) funding of all medical procedures, and leave health as a problem for individuals to solve with their own resources and ingenuity. Leave it to individuals to preserve their own health at their own expense.
The Republicans must shift their pro-life policies, as an outright abortion ban is not popular among voters in swing states, the WSJ editorial board argued. The abortion issue could result in another GOP loss in the 2024 presidential election if they don’t lessen their restrictions."
Trump warned about the same thing concerning the many losses in the midterm elections. He said the abortion issue was "mishandled" by many of those who lost.
Problem is, you can't sell women (and many men) on the idea that an embryo or fetus is a "person" until it's born and physically separate from the mother. It would be far better to concentrate on defunding all government (tax-paid) funding of all medical procedures, and leave health as a problem for individuals to solve with their own resources and ingenuity. Leave it to individuals to preserve their own health at their own expense.
The Democrat Party is no longer that of JFK.
I personally am opposed to tax-paid abortions, but I'm opposed to ALL tax-paid healthcare without exception.
In Wisconsin, the Democrat Governor wants it legal any time, any where, right up to (and maybe after birth). The Republicans (who control the senate and assembly) want something more reasonable (3-4 months, etc). But why would the governor negotiate when they can win over the issue.
With Protaseiwicz's victory all the Scott Walker reforms will be shot down.
1. Voter ID
2. Right to work
3. Conceal carry
4. ACT 10 (the Walker union, tax reforms, etc) that saved local governments MILLIONS of $$$
Wisconsin will go back to the tax and spend hell that is was back in 2008.
The only way to keep those reforms is to get them passed as consititutional amendments. But that take 2-3 years to pass in Wisconsin.
and people with a soul just happen to be against murder
Some little points to keep in-mind:
> They sell the parts, including the blood.
> Minorities far outnumber Caucasians in being coached into Infanticide.
> This is just what Eugenics preached for over 100 years, and still does.
I'm old, I've seen a lot in my sad things in my years. But I have never met a single women who didn't regret killing their prodigy. Maybe that should be part of the consoling, asking those women who killed their offspring, what they think about it now? Everyone that I know who did it, went on to have children that they love more than their own lives. I can't imagine the sleepless nights they suffer just thinking about the one that they didn't allow to live. Just can't fathom it.
the democrats cheated, paid people to vote
A few key questions are:
Do parents have dominion over their children?
Do people have dominion over their bodies?
The hypocrisy on both sides when considering these two questions is staggering.
My personal view is.....if God is just....there will be a reckoning. We read this. Elohim didn’t send Yeshua Hamashiach into the world to condemn it. The world condemns itself just fine. He is the way out of condemnation. Everybody chooses. Everybody. To quote Saint Geddy “If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice.”
It is my opinion and stand that those who do NOT fall within a given representation jurisdiction actually infringe upon the rights of those who do when they donate to candidates for representation outside their own. And I would fully support a Constitutional measure to codify this recognition. In my opinion, this would go a long way towards limiting the reach of elitists like Soros and others who seek to corrupt an entire nation through their money.
And leaving everything else that's possible to individuals too.
There should be hope because "Choice" is in the word pro-Choice, but I know it's not that simple.
I met Protasiewicz at her fundraiser, and I made sure to remind people I know to be sure to vote. She seems like a good person, but her fundraiser was just like a political fundraiser. All the other local politicians were there, sometimes volunteering the words that she couldn't say as a supposedly non-partisan jurist. I supported her, so I obiously think she's better than the alternative, but it's sort of un-real how the court has become so nakedly political.
Health insurance (and particularly "free" health insurance) merely allows medical providers to jack up rates, because in most cases the patient has no incentive to try to reduce costs.
Health insurance tied with a program negotiation prices, as major health insurance does in the US, removes pricing signal from the market. It leaves an illusion of a market. A cycnical view is law makers were balancing varoius desires: a) the desire for medical services to appear without paying for them, b) an appearance of a free market, c) the desire for existing insurance companies and their staffs to have something to do.