

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
But, as with roof PV, from a cost perspective they don’t make sense if you’re wanting to save money. Even if you are off grid with your own power for charging, gasoline is still cheaper and will likely always be so absent heavy handed government mandates.
A real eye opener is to consider an electric rover versus a liquid fuel rover on Mars. As the economics involved are dominated by transport costs and transport is limited by rocket capacity, even their liquid fuel rules supreme.
So if in a fully new space where there is no existing industry and infrastructure to compete with, EVs can’t compete, what hope is there for them to compete against that same tech when it has the infrastructure and industry to support it?
And just to be clear, the things WV rovers lose out on would be quite familiar: range, resupply time and expense (energy), maintenance, repair, flexibility, and cost to power.
And about 6 years later I got to see some real computers that took up whole buildings at Rocketdyne in Canoga Park. I got a job at their test facility in the Santa Susana mountains, now contaminated from a Sodium Reactor and other things we knew little about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_S...
We had a solar salesman give us a presentation at our new house. I've been attracted to solar for a number of years and was curious.
Doing some "pre-sales" research, we discovered that our electric bill was averaging $53 a month (we have natural gas) and was 1/3 the cost of our old house.
After all his calculations, we figured we would be paying $115 a month, for the next 20 years, just to pay off the solar installation.
With both of us in our 60's, we'd never see a payback on the system, so we politely declined.
I've been preparing for some 20 years. Watching the methodology of comfort and security traded for freedom and liberty.
John Calhoun's experiments with mice and rats in closed environments is becoming human reality. Aberrant behaviors of heightened aggression and withdrawal. No meaningful rights of passage for maturing young adults. The distractions of prosperity degrading into subjective hedonism (compare 1920s to 2020s) in drugs, alcohol, fetishes.
https://youtu.be/piXwDW36jBQ
Basically, you have to own this thing for like 8 years to get to 70% OF a normal cars carbon.
If you own it for 2yrs, you are under water on Carbon damage. (It would have been better to drive a normal vehicle, your total carbon footprint would be smaller).
Now, some of this is a problem of SCALE, and some of this is the DIRTY Mining for the elements...
Gosh...where did I hear thus just recently? What was the reaction by my fellow non-Gulch citizens?
Haha....
i used to drive 70 miles back and forth to work
in the worse conditions, using a EV for that range would be possible (cold hurting battery charge, cold requiring the heater, ect)
but that would mean it is a second vehicle
but the recharge time is a question
they would need enough to get to a safe place
but a valid idea to explore
but it also opens a bigger door
some EVs can be turned off on people
Load more comments...