Pretend you don’t see it at your peril. Chem or Contrails?

Posted by freedomforall 1 year, 4 months ago to Politics
7 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"Many of you have seen it, too. And then not seen it. Some days, there’s nothing in the sky but blue and some clouds and – up high – commercial jets at cruising altitude, their passing marked – briefly – by a thin white condensation trail, or contrail. It’s very cold at 30,000 feet. The hot exhaust stream (mostly water vapor) of the aircraft’s jet engines condenses as it cools, hence the thin white-looking trail. We’ve all seen this. And we’ve all seen how quickly these contrails dissipate after the jet has left the area.

You have probably also seen something else that may in fact be something else. A sky criss-crossed by lines that do not dissipate but spread out, creating what look like lines of artificial clouds that gradually blend into one another. They remain in the sky for hours, long after the jet that left them has left the area. It is claimed that these aren’t condensation trails at all but rather chemical trails, containing . . . something that isn’t the normal byproduct of jet exhaust.

The reasoning – which is reasonable – being that contrails didn’t used to linger for hours after the jet had left the area without dissipating. Also, that there is a clear difference – you can see it – between a jet leaving a contrail in its wake and a jet leaving something that looks very different in its wake. It is possible, certainly, that varying atmospheric conditions at altitude might account for the same thing (a contrail) looking like a different thing (chemtrail). And at one time, the default reasonable presumption would have been that it’s probably the same thing (a contrail) that just looks different, for reasons having nothing to do with sinister causes.

But – bearing in mind the times we’re living in and knowing what the people we’re dealing with have already done – it is not unreasonable to wonder whether there is something sinister afoot.

Arguably, it is prudent."
SOURCE URL: https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2022/11/30/chem-or-contrails/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by Flootus5 1 year, 4 months ago
    This issue has been around a long time. I remember the early enviros who were all caught up in burying the ICE on the first Earth Day being convinced that all these jet trails were a global conspiracy to cut down on the amount of solar radiation reaching the earth. Those evil oil companies just have to be behind it. It's "obvious".

    OK, well after 50 years of such speculation, who has come forth with the evidence that huge amounts of what chemicals are being added to aviation fuel at airports or refineries across the globe? After having produced and transported such chemicals for this purpose, hidden them at every stage along the way before adding to them to the millions of gallons of jet fuel without detection? And all along the way all those people involved in such a scheme after the careful production and testing of the composition, efficiency, and distribution of these products have never whistleblown on how, what, when, where this all happens. Ostensibly we know the speculative why all the way back to the modern day Luddites pushing their Return of the Primitive (Ayn Rand/Peter Schwarz) belief system all these years. I know, I know, yeah but.......

    However, it is always prudent to wonder and apply the sniff test of rationality. Even G Edward Griffin is into this one with "What In The World Are They Spraying?".
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 1 year, 4 months ago
    again
    the amount of any substance needed to have an effect is HUGE in the extreme

    a better explanation of why the world is in the state it is in is simple
    the take-over of schools by liberals and the dumbing down of the population as a whole, done on purpose
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 1 year, 4 months ago
      The perversion of the schools and universities is certainly true and effective, since parents are too busy working to pay proper attention to their offspring.
      However, I think the author's point is that this is another point of attack - and it may have made the assault on education easier as the chemicals have built up (if they do) in the environment and the food being produced.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by mhubb 1 year, 4 months ago
        read up on the attempted revenge attack on the water supply of a German city after WW2

        now, if we want to talk about all the drugs' being handed out to people, that is certainly a valid topic
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ AJAshinoff 1 year, 4 months ago
    A friend said once to me "Dilution is the solution to pollution"

    It would take massive amount of chemicals to alter the ocean or atmosphere even for short time.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 1 year, 4 months ago
    Me dino thinks Obama (O=0) must have read free's thread and acted 1-1=0 accordingly or maybe he had help with a higher number.
    So this is what me dino has always thought of Obama and any of his help~~ 0+1=1.
    Too bad 1 is all I got.
    I could use some help.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo