Best explanation I read was that there was a huge lake to the northeast - we're talking Lake Bonneville-size - where the rim broke open. Hydraulic excavation then took place over the span of a couple of months to form the entire canyon. Researchers found the sediment right where they predicted it - between the Baja Peninsula and Mexico.

questions for the followers of the human caused climate change religion

how old are the glaciers said to be melting, millions of years??
how old is the Earth??, 4.5 Billion years old

so what was there before the "melting" glaciers?
could there be cycles of glaciers forming and melting, long before human kind ever showed up??
why is this cycle the work of Man and not nature??

in the Sahara Desert are signs of people having lived in it, 4,000 to 5,000+ years ago
cave painting show people and animals that can no longer live in the desert
the climate changed, the desert formed, people moved to the Nile Valley and started the Egyptian civilization that created the Pyramids (along with other great structures
again this happened BEFORE our tech civilization
it is likely that over the past thousands of years the Sahara has gone from lush vegetation to desert over and over, the cycle repeating

i won't mention the cycles of Ice Ages and melts, perhaps were are in between two Ice Ages now...
likely so

and on TV
there is a show about bringing back animals from the last Ice Age
the ground there is melting
the fact is that those animals COULD NOT LIVE THERE if the land was ALWAYS frozen
at some point that land was ice free, allowing animals to live and thrive there
as it got colder, the animals changed and finally died off

you followers of the Global Warming religion think history began only a few hundred years ago

We the People
our kids
and generations still unborn (unless they are murdered as democrats seem to want)

damn...
we know stuff does move slowly....

and could move quickly also

i did see a TV show where it was said the Grand Canyon was carved out in a very short time

similar to how the Badlands are explained

water was damed up, the dam broke and the water flow carved the Badlands

Grand Canyon was said to be similar and to me makes more sense than the river reaching that far up each of the very wide areas

They can’t say who’ll pay, ..

One thing I know, who is going to pay.

I think that alternative media are beginning to have an impact -- that more Regular Folks are seeing the absurdity and abuse of power that is the Climate Change Agenda. I am a travelled ultra runner. The UltraSignup site recently posted a story regarding 20 runners from around the world, running a high elevation race in Bhutan (near Tibet). The runners were there per invite from the King to "raise awareness" of the Climate Crisis. Long story short -- the Replies to the story were 80% in agreement that the whole trip, even with all the Counting Carbon Credits and planting a Ceremonial Tree by the river, was nothing more than sloppy virtue signaling nonsense -- and that Ultra Running is not a Clean Green Carbon-Free sport (in particular when you travel via international flights and eat a crap ton of food while running 100+ miles, etc). We need to work locally to keep the Agenda 2030 crap from sneaking into our communities through City planning boards and councils.

As mentioned by others -- I am more concerned with the G20 Vax requirement for travel nonsense. Fauci also made a statement before retirement about the Unvaxxed "Those People" who present the greatest danger in terms of this costly plandemic. I am grateful to see that fraud hit the exit.

In the Thankful department, my state of Arizona has several counties (Cochise, where I live) that are delaying certification of the recent election's results. Of course, I am just an "election denier" (aka Those People).

Or how about the Grand Canyon? Most contemporary geologists say it happened over millions of years, but can not explain the lack of sediment or the relatively sharp walls of the canyon much more typical of a short-term event.

Personally, anyone who says that some process "took millions of years" is simply admitting their own ignorance in the underlying processes by pretending that time somehow makes change possible.

we know stuff does not slowly, California for example

could if move quickly?
very possibly

Same here. Now they won't get it passed as a real treaty through the Senate (requires 2/3 majority) but not that that has stopped much in real life...

Keep in mind, however, that most of what we "know" is pure speculation. They've found fossils in Antarctica which show that at one point it was located near the equator. And if you've looked at the models of "continental drift," they all propose time frames in the tens or hundreds of millions of years despite the fossil records being nearly identical between South America and Africa. Identical fossil records suggest sudden, catastrophic change rather than gradual change...

Yeah! Presence of a glacier implies warmer temperatures, pre-glacier!

This is exactly how politicians steal. By spending, especially by spending overseas. I swear the Federal government should be audited down the the last dollar spent, down to every single end-user.

By LeChatlier's principle it makes sense:

CO2 + H2O <---------> C6H12O6 + O2

Increasing the concentration of carbon dioxide on the left
shifts the equilibrium to the right, increasing the production of oxygen and sugars from photosynthesis.

Follow the Science, libtards.

True - 1000 years ago they could reach N America within sight of land nearly the whole way. Iceland, Greenland, E Canada.

i ask members of the climate change religon just how old the glaciers are

most are millions, maybe 10s of millions of years old, which means the climate was warmer at some point

and no need to mention the dinosaur fossils found in Antarctica

Ah, yes,the Biblical Mark of the Woke.

Amazing how all of the Sci Fi movies of the sixties and seventies are coming true. Next step will be bar codes on our necks

And now that Greenland's coastal glaciers have started melting, remnants of the Viking settlements, from 1,000 years ago, are once again visible.
But, but "science"!

Indeed. For socialism to prevail there cannot be any rational thought.
Fortunately, in the long term reality requires the prevailing system to obey physical laws.
Unfortunately, the innocent honest people are the ones who suffer when the system is socialism,

COP27 was a joke. Dance like an Egyptian. What was scarier to me was G20, where they agreed to the concept of a worldwide vaccine passport. Prelude to a world digital ID.

Yes....there were settlements in Greenland that they determined failed because the climate got colder and crops failed. Funny how “SCIENCE” is suddenly subjective isn’t it?

Mark Twain once remarked, "The only time my wallet feels safe is when congress is not in session." I'd say the same for these busy body bureaucrats.

was watching a TV show on Vikings in America last weekend
one of the scientists said that 1,000 years ago it was warmer than now and warm enough for the Vikings to have settlements in northern America, then it started to get colder

so warmer 1,000 years ago, warmer than now
and no SUVs??!!!!

we are being lied to, but a large number of people for different reason
some for power
some for money