Why do Hanks hold on to Lillians?
Why do Hanks hold onto Lillians?
I have searched my entire life for my Hank, and have yet to find him. Well, at least not available. I do see Hanks around and they seem to always have a Lillian hanging on. Why? I see this as a contradiction. How can someone live a happy, fulfilling life with a contradiction like this? I will not compromise or sacrifice myself, and don't don't want anyone to compromise or sacrifice for me.
Lillian has no respect for Hank, his work or his business as demonstrated when he gives her a bracelet made from the 1st heat of his new metal, mockingly saying: “You mean,”...”it's fully as valuable as a piece of railroad rails?” She jingled the bracelet, making it sparkle under the light. “Henry it's perfectly wonderful! What originality! I shall be the sensation of New York, wearing jewelry made of the same stuff as bridge girders, truck motors, kitchen stoves, typewriters, and – what was it you were saying about it the other day, darling? - soup kettles?”
Lillian is not particularly interested in Hanks money, of course until she has none, but she is very interested in her position and image. Hank has no other value to her. She uses him as a pawn to gain position and pull as demonstrated when attending James Taggart's wedding.
Then there are family members.
Hank's mother: “The intention's plain selfishness, if you ask me,” said Reardens mother. “another man would bring a diamond bracelet, if he want to give his wife a present, because it's her pleasure he'd think of not his own. But Henry thinks that just because he's made a new kind of tin, why, it's got to be more precious than diamonds to everybody, just because it's he that's made it. That's the way he's been since he was five years old – the most conceited brat you ever saw – and I knew he'd grow up to be the most selfish creature on God's earth.”
Philip: “By the way, Henry,” Philip added, “do you mind if I ask you to have Miss Ives give me the money in cash?” …...”You see, Friends of Global Progress are a very progressive group and they have always maintained that you represent the blackest element of social retrogression in the country, so it would embarrass us, you know, to have your name on our list of contributors, because somebody might accuse us of being in the pay of Hank Rearden.”
Here is AR on Contradiction (From The Virtue of Selfishness): The Law of Identity (A is A) is a rational man’s paramount consideration in the process of determining his interests. He knows that the contradictory is the impossible, that a contradiction cannot be achieved in reality and that the attempt to achieve it can lead only to disaster and destruction. Therefore, he does not permit himself to hold contradictory values, to pursue contradictory goals, or to imagine that the pursuit of a contradiction can ever be to his interest.
Does your significant other respect and value you and your philosophy of life? If not, why are you still there?
I have searched my entire life for my Hank, and have yet to find him. Well, at least not available. I do see Hanks around and they seem to always have a Lillian hanging on. Why? I see this as a contradiction. How can someone live a happy, fulfilling life with a contradiction like this? I will not compromise or sacrifice myself, and don't don't want anyone to compromise or sacrifice for me.
Lillian has no respect for Hank, his work or his business as demonstrated when he gives her a bracelet made from the 1st heat of his new metal, mockingly saying: “You mean,”...”it's fully as valuable as a piece of railroad rails?” She jingled the bracelet, making it sparkle under the light. “Henry it's perfectly wonderful! What originality! I shall be the sensation of New York, wearing jewelry made of the same stuff as bridge girders, truck motors, kitchen stoves, typewriters, and – what was it you were saying about it the other day, darling? - soup kettles?”
Lillian is not particularly interested in Hanks money, of course until she has none, but she is very interested in her position and image. Hank has no other value to her. She uses him as a pawn to gain position and pull as demonstrated when attending James Taggart's wedding.
Then there are family members.
Hank's mother: “The intention's plain selfishness, if you ask me,” said Reardens mother. “another man would bring a diamond bracelet, if he want to give his wife a present, because it's her pleasure he'd think of not his own. But Henry thinks that just because he's made a new kind of tin, why, it's got to be more precious than diamonds to everybody, just because it's he that's made it. That's the way he's been since he was five years old – the most conceited brat you ever saw – and I knew he'd grow up to be the most selfish creature on God's earth.”
Philip: “By the way, Henry,” Philip added, “do you mind if I ask you to have Miss Ives give me the money in cash?” …...”You see, Friends of Global Progress are a very progressive group and they have always maintained that you represent the blackest element of social retrogression in the country, so it would embarrass us, you know, to have your name on our list of contributors, because somebody might accuse us of being in the pay of Hank Rearden.”
Here is AR on Contradiction (From The Virtue of Selfishness): The Law of Identity (A is A) is a rational man’s paramount consideration in the process of determining his interests. He knows that the contradictory is the impossible, that a contradiction cannot be achieved in reality and that the attempt to achieve it can lead only to disaster and destruction. Therefore, he does not permit himself to hold contradictory values, to pursue contradictory goals, or to imagine that the pursuit of a contradiction can ever be to his interest.
Does your significant other respect and value you and your philosophy of life? If not, why are you still there?
Previous comments... You are currently on page 4.
After 40 years of living my life that way before being introduced to objectivism I understand completely.
Hank's failed marriage is not for the purpose of making him "as human as any other average Joe." Instead it shows the consequence of a mistake of judgment, Because Rand drew "larger-than-life" characters, Lillian was Hank's larger-than-life mistake.
As for fantasy, all fiction uses fantasy. Rand tries to show what is possible in the real world. Some other authors show the impossible, or set scenes in unreal words, or both. Personally, I do not care for fantasy novels in which the plot (if any) moves through hand waving or through a series of dei ex machina. "Suddenly the magician appeared and waved his hand. The villain shrank into dust."
I completely agree about the anti-villian concept. I had not given a term to that type of character but it is fitting.
Second, there's Lillian's point of view, too. She felt that Hank didn't really love her, he's always blowing off things she wants to do, not particularly interested in spending time with her, etc. That makes it tough on a partner, and it doesn't surprise me that the partner would start lashing out.
I agree, they probably shouldn't have married in the first place, but the fault isn't one-sided here.
I hesitate to call myself a Hank, but I did own a business, I was expected to make that business grow, to increase profits, in order to provide for her. But as with Hank's Lillian, I was chastised constantly at the same time for working too much. It was never enough, yet constantly too much.
I had become the means to her end.
I had been told for over a decade that it was my role to work and to provide. I became numb to it after while. I didn't want to upset the balance, I didn't want my business split up, I didn't want the children to suffer through the end of the family they knew. The relationship faded and turned into one of provider and taker, while we danced around each other and pretended in front of friends and family.
Fast forward 4 years - I'm happily married to an intelligent, beautiful woman, an objectivist who doesn't expect me to be the sole provider and slave to her desires.
There are real life Lillians, and real life Hanks. But there's light at the end of the tunnel - it takes strength to change - and the realization that your mind nor body should never be used as a tool for someone else's gains - even if you did "put a ring on it."
Reality becomes the most important aspect of a relationship after about 1.5 years.
Reality becomes the most important aspect of a relationship after about 1.5 years.
In 1998, I married a woman who was as lovely as I could ask for, and who also not only respected but shared my philosophy of life. I made a judgment that I must not hide who I am for anything, that beauty is not worth giving up that much self-respect.
In the eight years and nine months before she died of cancer, my wife was not the supercilious married "escort" that Lillian was. She was as much friend as lover. And a very good friend.
Someone else said below that Hank is the only character who develops in the novel. I would dispute that; I would say Dagny Taggart also has some developing to do, if only a realization that she cannot reach her society, and it is better to build another railroad, if that is the price of living.
But this comes to a point I realized when I decided to review AS extensively. The heroes of AS are not Dagny and John, but Dagny and Hank. John, Francisco, and Ragnar are anti-villains. Like all literary villains, they appear fully developed; unlike them, they serve a just cause, not an evil one.
Maybe all these Hanks you're finding are early-book Hanks, and they need an education from Dagny ;)
Load more comments...