Best thing possible would be for him to be silent, abdicate early, and turn it over to William. People (Brits, US, et al) could get behind William and Kate! Chucky can sit around listening to crap 1950's music, eating lemons, playing with toy soldiers and letting Camel-toe tie him up in the dark..
either of them would have the same issues- wooden persona. We dont live in England, so its not going to make much difference to the USA. I wish them good luck as a country.
The Queen will be missed. I am not looking forward to King Charles, though. His thinking is aligned with the globalists. Believes in climate change, pro immigration, reduce the monarchy, etc etc.
I have to admit I don’t follow the royal folks much, but what little I’ve seen I liked the queen and could care less about the rest. Chucky seems like a spoiled self loathing elitist rich kid like Freddy of the Marx/Engles duo from hell.
Queen E. did not involve herself in all of the garbage going on in the world. Thus, she maintained her respect. Charlie will likely try to use his position to push his government into stupid decisions. So, he will diminish the monarchy. A shame.
Lmao , today the British Government warned people not to go to London for their own safety. Oh and the maniacal invasion of Middle East and African’s who are causing the crime violence and chaos now out number natural born Brits.
the las vegas metro police warned people here NOT to go to certain parts of NE Vegas for their own safety. I had never heard of a warning like this in the USA before.
Brexit was due a long time ago. Britain should never have joined the EU in the first place. Their statist leanings and WOKE mentality thats a part of their culture is not good and the chickens have come home to roost
yeah, we, as well as the other colonies, won independence from the King of England. Fortunately, the english saw the handwriting on the wall, and maintained essentially good relations wit the former colonies
The Queen represented British tradition. I would just like to point out that the period of time in history that Ayn Rand felt represented the greatest advancement of mankind (and relative peace, few wars) coincided with the peak of the British Empire. Sadly, it is an empire no more.
I thought the Queen exerted an even hand over the years? Was that even hand when she was forced to remove her exposed Pedo Prince Andrew from royal duties?
Its difficult to judge people who lived in the past by the norms at the time, If the current norms were applied to all people equally, no matter when they lived, I dare say everyone in the past would be labeled a disaster.
What does your statement have to do with THE QUEEN performing lifelong satanic ritualistic abuse of children according to much evidence including some of her victims claims , her dead victims of course can’t talk..
Actually I know nothing of satanic rituals relative to children. Sounds a bit far fetched in a time when the papparazzi and tabloids seem to find out the smallest of details.
I am glad you have an opinion after stating 'I know nothing about Satanic rituals with children". Yes, and please ignore over a hundred headlines from tabloids on this topic.
To be strictly accurate, I have no personal knowledge about any satanic rituals having to do with queen Elizabeth II. Until I have some personal knowledge, I have no reason to think that she had anything to do with satanic rituals.
While I think she held the post with nice poise I am bracing myself for the worshiping and fawning the media is going to shove down this nation of former patriots' throats...
You probably would have to admit that the whole royalty thing is a stabilizing force for a country. Compare that with the USA, where every 4 years our system is like a yo-yo
Its an interesting monarchy. Doesnt really matter much in practical terms, except that it stabilizes the soul of the people. I am not agreeing with their socialist leanings at all, just mentioning that compared with our yo yo system, its a bit more stable.
- Charles is not only the oldest person to ascend to the throne, he's the oldest man to occupy it in the last 200 years.
- Until recently, the rules of succession favored males; a woman could inherit the throne only if she had no brothers. But the two longest-ruling monarchs were women (QEII and Victoria). Women had a historical impact out of proportion to their numbers; if you asked someone to name a British monarch from before the 20th century, Victoria and Elizabeth I would probably be the top two answers.
The king/queen are essentially to represent the soul of the country (if they want to keep their heads attached to their bodies)). I would say its a really tough and demanding job.
I had been fiddling around on the internet listening to music by Georg Friedrich Handel and discovered he had been commissioned by King George 2nd to write some coronation music for his accession to the throne in 1729. Handel wrote four pieces, one of which, Zadok the King, you hear a very familiar refrain. How I got from Peter, Paul and Mary to Handel's coronation anthems is a long and circuitous journey through the twisted canals of my thoughts. Better saved for another time. Anyway, I hope to be watching the coronation of King Charles 3rd, for we shall probably not see its like in what remains of our lifetimes. As a point of information, these anthems have been used in every coronation since 1729.
Charles just needs to sit there for a while and shut up. Maybe his son can do something useful. He is the definition of a British knob!
Oh and the maniacal invasion of Middle East and African’s who are causing the crime violence and chaos now out number natural born Brits.
Good even hand destroying England.
Brexit was due a long time ago. Britain should never have joined the EU in the first place. Their statist leanings and WOKE mentality thats a part of their culture is not good and the chickens have come home to roost
Didn't we fight (and win!) a War of Independence, to be free from a British monarch?
Honor.
Yes, and please ignore over a hundred headlines from tabloids on this topic.
https://gab.com/Free_Range_Bum/posts/...
I couldn't give two shits about the royals...
Positive aspects of a monarchy.
- Charles is not only the oldest person to ascend to the throne, he's the oldest man to occupy it in the last 200 years.
- Until recently, the rules of succession favored males; a woman could inherit the throne only if she had no brothers. But the two longest-ruling monarchs were women (QEII and Victoria). Women had a historical impact out of proportion to their numbers; if you asked someone to name a British monarch from before the 20th century, Victoria and Elizabeth I would probably be the top two answers.