16

"This Is A Full-Blown Political Purge": Tucker Carlson Obtains DOJ Subpoenas Targeting Trump Allies. The Buydem Administration Are Unlelected Traitors.

Posted by freedomforall 2 weeks, 1 day ago to Politics
59 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"This show has obtained a subpoena from Merrick Garland's DOJ issued in the past week and what it demands is both unlawful and without precedent in American history. The subpoena claims to be investigating, "any claim that the vice president and/or president of the Senate had the authority to reject or choose not to count presidential electors."

Now keep in mind that any claim you make as an American citizen about electors, any claim you make about American politics, period, is protected explicitly under the First Amendment. That's our core freedom. It's why we live here. It's why we're proud to be Americans. It's why so many American servicemen died protecting our country. Those are the freedoms that they fought to preserve. That's why nobody prosecuted leading Democrats in 2016 when they sought to reject electors for Donald Trump. Right. It's why none of those people, including Kamala Harris, is now in jail."

----------------------------------------------

The traitors who stole the 2020 election are doing exactly what they claimed Trump would do and exactly what they are now attempting to frame him with.
The current administration, all the Democrat con-gress, and some GOP RINO leaders are guilty of treason. There will be no justice and no punishment for those crimes because the Department of Justice is being run by traitors.
If the People do not take matters into their own hands to arrest, try, and punish the traitors, we are all slaves.
NIFOITOWTBS
They must be
SOURCE URL: http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=63334


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by 25n56il4 2 weeks, 1 day ago
    FFA, You are very learned on the Constitution. Explain to me how Madam Harris can be Vice President when the Constitution plainly says, 'No person Constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of President of the United States.' Robert's Rules say 'shall' is mandatory and 'May' can allow!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by mhubb 2 weeks, 1 day ago
      same way obama was POTUS
      (him not being a NBC either)
      no one cares what the Constitution says
      at least no one that can stop these traitors
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by 25n56il4 2 weeks, 1 day ago
        I beg your pardon. His only parent was a citizen of the United States. He just didn't have a father and I didn't vote for him but this is the case.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ Dobrien 2 weeks, 1 day ago
          His real birth certificate says he was born in Kenya.
          His father was Kenyan. Further evidence is When he “enrolled“ at Columbia University he said he was Barry Soetoro and was foreign student from Kenya. Oh yes and the pesky video where in a speech he says he is the first Kenyan born US President. Come on N. He even pretended to have two daughters with his tranny wife. Those girls , evidence indicates are borrowed from Barry and Big Mikes friends.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by mhubb 2 weeks, 1 day ago
          sorry wrong
          his dad was NOT a US Citizen at the time of his birth
          so he was not a NBC

          hint: it takes 2 parents to have a child
          his birth was NOT Immaculate Conception
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by 25n56il4 2 weeks, 1 day ago
            Well excuse me. I think we are saying the same thing. We don't demand you have two married to each other parents. We don't label a child, they can run for anything and that subject doesn't even come up. The Constitution doesn't say the parents have to be married...they just both must be citizens of the U.S at the time of the child's birth. Harris's parent were not citizens. That's what I said. And O'Bama's mother was a citizen.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by mhubb 2 weeks, 1 day ago
              you said married, not me
              married or not is irrelevant

              i said dad


              and YES both parents NEED TO BE citizens at the time of birth

              the goal was to NOT have a kid with divided loyalties
              or do you think the Founders wanted a kid loyal to England as POTUS??

              so Ted Cruz cannot be POTUS, for example

              i am consistent in my view and this view is certainty shard by others
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ gharkness 2 weeks ago
          Unless he is the newest "immaculate conception" (apologies to any and all Catholics), he definitely had a father. ETA: that didn't make him "eligible," but he definitely had a father.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by 25n56il4 2 weeks, 1 day ago
    I do respect your opinion and thank you for this Post. It's another incident of the frauds played upon us by this administration. I, personally am tired of their ineptness. NB
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 2 weeks ago
    The democrats are playing with fire here. Once the people cant actually vote and have them counted fairly, there is no more democracy, and in fact there is only violence as an alternative.

    The democrats should be very careful NOT to make the elections a sham.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 2 weeks ago
    Barring divine intervention (by way of massive natural disaster) I believe this nation is headed toward another civil war - one which the arrogant Democrats think they will win.

    I pray this will not be the case but am preparing for either.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by starguy 2 weeks ago
    We know that Brandon isn't calling the shots: his dementia is getting worse, by the day.
    So, who's really running things, then?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ gharkness 2 weeks ago
      We've been asking that same question since before the 2020 election. Responses vary, but we can't really know, until it's too late. That may be soon, or it may have already happened.

      ONCE WE KNOW, it for sure will be too late to do anything about it.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 2 weeks, 1 day ago
    I watched Tucker last night (don't watch much tv other than golf) and I couldn't believe the stories. They are sending FBI agents to people's doors on "anonymous tips" and making people prove they were at the "insurrection". We're past the slippery slope, folks. At THE VERY LEAST this is just intimidation of people who mention something against the narrative on FB. That alone is prompting some of these visits. Wow!

    I just thought, "I hope this Fox News stuff is a load of B.S...."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Dobrien 2 weeks, 1 day ago
    +1 for this post.
    4700
    Sep 14, 2020 12:34:31 PM EDT
    Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: a54ff9 No. 10644532
    Worth remembering [think what you see today].
    https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents... 📁
    INSURGENCY can be defined as ‘the organized use of subversion and violence to seize, nullify, or challenge political control of a region.’
    Insurgents seek to subvert or displace the government and completely or partially control the resources and population of a given territory. They do so through the use of force (including guerrilla warfare, terrorism and coercion/intimidation), propa- ganda, subversion and political mobilization. Insurgents fight government forces only to the extent needed to achieve their political aims: their main effort is not to kill counterinsurgents, but rather to establish a competitive system of control over the population, making it impossible for the government to administer its territory and people. Insurgent activity is therefore designed to weaken government control and legitimacy while increasing insurgent control and influence.
    Insurgents require supporters, recruits, safe havens, money, supplies, weapons and intelligence on government actions. A robust INSURGENCY can be waged with the support of just a small percentage of a given population.
    NEXT:
    CounterINSURGENCY may be defined as ‘comprehensive civilian and military efforts taken to simultaneously defeat and contain INSURGENCY and address its root causes’.
    Q
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo