Chemtrails are not contrails

Posted by bobbitchen34 1 year, 5 months ago to Science
8 comments | Share | Flag

I finally heard someone who was stating what I have observed for a few years now. And his summary of the why this is happening matched exactly what I believe.
The globalists are ruining the environment to give weight to their phony man made global warming.
I had noticed that every time some rain in is the forecast up here NORTHERN California (not to be confused with the bay area).Well suddenly there is a matrix of chemtrails or what they tells are contrails. Everything I heard this guy say was something I was suspecting and it was so refreshing to hear someone say it .

Add Comment


All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by mhubb 1 year, 5 months ago
    one more time....

    after WW2, a Jewish group wanted to punish the Germans, for very clear and valid reasons

    the plan was to poison the water of a German city

    they abandoned the plan due to the HUGE amount of chemicals needed

    any "chemical" released into the air has the EXACT SAME ISSUE
    the amount required to have any effect is beyond the ability to deliver
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Dobrien 1 year, 5 months ago
      You do not understand nano technology.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by mhubb 1 year, 5 months ago
        so these chems are self-replicating machines?

        please explain...

        also include the minimum required to have some effect
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by Dobrien 1 year, 5 months ago
          So you have formed an opinion with out looking into the facts and now you want me to educate you.
          This from the posted article….
          How do particles sprayed into the air affect the weather? Persistent aerial spraying of particulate matter into the regions where clouds form (1) inhibits rainfall to the point of massive downpours, the so-called "drought or deluge" effect, (2) heats the atmosphere, (3) retards heat loss from the Earth, and (4) upon falling to earth, absorbs sunlight. In short, the aerial spraying destroys the natural weather cycle, contaminates Earth’s biosphere, and causes global warming — consequences falsely blamed on fossil fuel burning.

          California Desiccation: Setting the Stage for California Fires.

          How does the aerial spraying endanger human health? The adverse public health effects of aerosolized particulate matter can be inferred from pollution studies of particulates 2.5 mm and smaller. Exposure to such particles has been shown to be associated with increased hospital admissions, morbidity and premature mortality, risk for cardiovascular disease and lung cancer, other lung diseases including asthma, diabetes, risk for stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, reduced renal function in older men, low birth weight, reduced male fertility and decreased cognitive ability in older women. Adverse health effects of aerosolized coal fly ash (CFA) include (1) neurological disorders, such as Autism Spectrum Disorder, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, (2) lung cancer and respiratory disorders, and (3) numerous other disorders resulting from the plethora of toxic elements in this material, including arsenic, mercury, and radioactive elements. The most at risk are the young, the old, and those with compromised respiratory and immune systems.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by 1 year, 5 months ago
            Right on! Yes how about reading the article before giving out the glib statements. This (GGO) is more of a forum, it's not Twitter. The author of the article certainly has the credentials. It is amazing to me how many of the things in the article that Dobrien has brought to the surface match my beliefs derived from my observations.
            I'm not going to play the science card like when Fauci claimed to be the living and breathing manifestation of science but I've had enough training in the hard sciences to formulate my theories and when I read the article it resonated with these.
            Note to Dobrien; thank you for extracting out the points I was referring to. Much better job than what I did.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  


  • Comment hidden. Undo