Leftist Monkey-Pox narratives collide, cause media consternation: report facts or stigmatize "at risk" population

Posted by bubah1mau 2 years, 10 months ago to Culture
3 comments | Share | Flag

Fear of stigmatizing "imperiled" leads to shifting definitions and descriptions--even changing the name of the disease.


All Comments

  • Posted by LibertyBelle 2 years, 10 months ago
    Suppose somebody wrote about lung cancer, then said that a significant number of those who contracted it were smokers (and then recommended that, to avoid it, people would be well -advised either to quite smoking or not start in the first place).--Would there be a lot of screaming about smokers' being discriminated against, and not being helped,being oppressed, etc,? Oh yeah, I seem to remember that such views were being expressed, but I don't recall many such complaints.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Markus_Katabri 2 years, 10 months ago
    Leftists: You may not reference GAY in relation to Monkey Pox.
    Me: Got it!.......Don’t say GAY.
    Leftists: ReeeeeEeeeeEeeeEeeeeeee BIGOT!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 2 years, 10 months ago
    Actually, reporting facts isn't an option for leftist media.

    The ZeroHedge article by Ben Bartee, originating in the Daily Bell, asserts correctly that leftist media consternation comes from the intrinsic SJW need to spread terror and fear, generating a crisis that might improve Democrat chances in coming elections with lockdowns and universal mail-in balloting--vs the imperative to prevent any negative public perception of favored "at risk" classes or groups.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo