Either Agree With the Left Or YOU ARE A CRIMINAL - The Next Step Is Death Camps For Those Who Disagree
Posted by freedomforall 1 year, 8 months ago to Politics
Excerpt:
"The Leftists who control the federal and some state governments – with the help of a number of “Republicans,” as they style themselves – intend to govern by criminalizing. The whole point of this “January 6” business being the first overt step toward this new elaboration of “democracy” – the working definition of which is: Agree with the Left (or at least, do not question the Left) else be characterized – criminalized – as a “threat to our (meaning their) democracy.”
“Democracy” being their one-party rule.
That is the message being conveyed – openly, now – by the Leftists (plus the abetting “Republicans”) who have already had people locked up and caged, some indefinitely, without formally charging them with any crime, much less convicting them. Previous Leftists such as Woodrow Wilson and Abraham Lincoln – interestingly, the founder of the “Republican” party – did the same, previously.
Thereby establishing the precedent.
More recently, The Chimp – another “Republican” – narrowed his beady eyes, pursed his thin lips and declaimed, “you’re either with us or against us.” By which the sociopathic simian meant, If you question us, you are a threat to our democracy. The Chimp openly asserted the right to criminalize questioning, the power to drag people out of bed at night (or in broad daylight) and imprison them without charge. Torture them (“advanced interrogation”) at his personal whim.
People forget, especially rank and file “Republicans,” who try not to remember because they are addled by a false distinction between Leftists and “Republicans.”
It is also worth a mention that it was The Chimp who set in place the architecture, ready to elaborate, for the enforcement measures of the “public health emergency” we’ve been living in for the past almost-three-years now, during which refusing to wear a “mask” or close the doors to one’s business became arrestable “crimes.”
The Chimp and his “Republicans” gave us “Homeland Security,” too.
Now the Left – with the aid and comfort of “Republicans” – is on the verge of criminalizing the retail sale, person-to-person transfer and inevitably, the possession of what they style “assault rifles.” By which they mean not the selectable/automatic-fire rifles carried by the enforcement class (i.e., the military and the quasi-military that styles itself “law enforcement”) but rather practically every semi-automatic rifle owned by millions of average people who’ve never committed any “gun crime.”
This “assault rifle” business is of a piece with the “climate change” business in that both terms are deliberately non-specific, in order to encompass everything and thereby justify anything. They are also both predicated on deliberate misrepresentation, hysteria and pre-guilting. If you question whether the “climate” is “changing” unnaturally and catastrophically – and insist on facts rather than assertions – you are a “denier” and (you can feel it) a de facto criminal, who will soon be locked up for “denying.” Just as the Leftist drug-pusher who runs the “vaccine” company, Pfizer, characterized anyone who questions being coerced or even compelled to take “vaccines” is . . . you guessed it, a “criminal.”
And yes, he actually said exactly that."
"The Leftists who control the federal and some state governments – with the help of a number of “Republicans,” as they style themselves – intend to govern by criminalizing. The whole point of this “January 6” business being the first overt step toward this new elaboration of “democracy” – the working definition of which is: Agree with the Left (or at least, do not question the Left) else be characterized – criminalized – as a “threat to our (meaning their) democracy.”
“Democracy” being their one-party rule.
That is the message being conveyed – openly, now – by the Leftists (plus the abetting “Republicans”) who have already had people locked up and caged, some indefinitely, without formally charging them with any crime, much less convicting them. Previous Leftists such as Woodrow Wilson and Abraham Lincoln – interestingly, the founder of the “Republican” party – did the same, previously.
Thereby establishing the precedent.
More recently, The Chimp – another “Republican” – narrowed his beady eyes, pursed his thin lips and declaimed, “you’re either with us or against us.” By which the sociopathic simian meant, If you question us, you are a threat to our democracy. The Chimp openly asserted the right to criminalize questioning, the power to drag people out of bed at night (or in broad daylight) and imprison them without charge. Torture them (“advanced interrogation”) at his personal whim.
People forget, especially rank and file “Republicans,” who try not to remember because they are addled by a false distinction between Leftists and “Republicans.”
It is also worth a mention that it was The Chimp who set in place the architecture, ready to elaborate, for the enforcement measures of the “public health emergency” we’ve been living in for the past almost-three-years now, during which refusing to wear a “mask” or close the doors to one’s business became arrestable “crimes.”
The Chimp and his “Republicans” gave us “Homeland Security,” too.
Now the Left – with the aid and comfort of “Republicans” – is on the verge of criminalizing the retail sale, person-to-person transfer and inevitably, the possession of what they style “assault rifles.” By which they mean not the selectable/automatic-fire rifles carried by the enforcement class (i.e., the military and the quasi-military that styles itself “law enforcement”) but rather practically every semi-automatic rifle owned by millions of average people who’ve never committed any “gun crime.”
This “assault rifle” business is of a piece with the “climate change” business in that both terms are deliberately non-specific, in order to encompass everything and thereby justify anything. They are also both predicated on deliberate misrepresentation, hysteria and pre-guilting. If you question whether the “climate” is “changing” unnaturally and catastrophically – and insist on facts rather than assertions – you are a “denier” and (you can feel it) a de facto criminal, who will soon be locked up for “denying.” Just as the Leftist drug-pusher who runs the “vaccine” company, Pfizer, characterized anyone who questions being coerced or even compelled to take “vaccines” is . . . you guessed it, a “criminal.”
And yes, he actually said exactly that."
Even back then it raised the hair on my neck.
Remember folks.....it’s actually NOT communism they are trying to bring about. It’s Neo-Feudalism. Try telling the normies that instead. The evidence is easy to see. Everytime there’s a “Rules for thee, not for me.” Moment.....catalog it.
Francis Key Howard (grandson of Francis Scott Key) was a Baltimore newspaper editor during the Civil War.
His paper questioned the necessity of the war, and was ripped from his home in dark of night by soldiers, and jailed in military prison without trial.
He wrote about it in his book, "Fourteen Months in American Bastiles". In it, he wrote about his experiences and those of his fellow political prisoners, some of whom were there simply because his neighbor disliked him, and told the authorities he was speaking against Lincoln. Again, without benefit of trial.
That's where we're heading. Canada is already there. Just ask Tamara Lich and pastor Artur Pawlowski.
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-h...