A strong case presented for severe vetting of anyone who wants to arrive/stay in the US--and that includes 99 percent of Biden's/Mayorkas' phony "asylum seekers."

Destitution, need are no arguments for access to US residence/welfare programs on any terms. US already has enough destitute, homeless actual citizens.

How will US citizens pay for health problems, criminal activities of Biden's/Mayorkas' millions of open-border "asylum" migrants and fully illegal, border-crasher runaways? Mayorkas claims border is "completely under control." Mayorkas should have added: completely under control" to ensure impoverishing US citizens and the rot/disintegration of traditional American culture/values.

Rule at US borders should not be "What can US do for you?" but rather "How does the US profit from your expected residence?". There is no intrinsic profit from granting "asylum"--and other countries in the world know this very well. Japan, for example, routinely rejects more than 98 percent of "asylum"/refugee requests. [ https://www.nippon.com/en/japan-data/... ] (And those that are accepted are carefully vetted to be sure they won't become wards of the state.)

Also note from the linked chart (above) that the number of "migrant" refugees accepted by Japan has been steadily declining over recent years while US has become increasingly promiscuous in allowing "migrants" to access residence/welfare benefits. Japan, eager to preserve its native culture, employs severe vetting of would-be "migrants. Why can't the US do the same?