Does the federal government ever defend Americans' freedom?
Posted by freedomforall 1 year, 10 months ago to Government
Excerpt:
"It seems to me the U.S. military – which might more accurately be styled the federal military – is simply the enforcement division of the federal government and the corporations that own and so control it.
Marine Major General Butler elaborated this fact some 100 years go, from the perspective of a top-level enforcer, who came to realize (and regret) his “service.” I suspect there are many such now but more who cannot deal with the fact and so suppress it by convincing themselves they are “fighting for freedom” and “defending democracy.”
But, I ask – and gently: How, exactly, has the federal military fought for our freedom? Yours and mine?
I mean since the War for Independence?
It did fight – or threaten to – after the war was over, to take away the freedom of rural American farmers who objected to being told they must pay taxes in currency they didn’t have, because they lived mostly by barter using the whiskey they distilled from the crops they grew. They did not see that they “owed” taxes to the federal government or anyone else, not having agreed to them.
Washington – the general – sent federal troops to make sure they did pay them."
"It seems to me the U.S. military – which might more accurately be styled the federal military – is simply the enforcement division of the federal government and the corporations that own and so control it.
Marine Major General Butler elaborated this fact some 100 years go, from the perspective of a top-level enforcer, who came to realize (and regret) his “service.” I suspect there are many such now but more who cannot deal with the fact and so suppress it by convincing themselves they are “fighting for freedom” and “defending democracy.”
But, I ask – and gently: How, exactly, has the federal military fought for our freedom? Yours and mine?
I mean since the War for Independence?
It did fight – or threaten to – after the war was over, to take away the freedom of rural American farmers who objected to being told they must pay taxes in currency they didn’t have, because they lived mostly by barter using the whiskey they distilled from the crops they grew. They did not see that they “owed” taxes to the federal government or anyone else, not having agreed to them.
Washington – the general – sent federal troops to make sure they did pay them."
to create credit from nothing and charge everyone interest on that credit. Since then inflation has destroyed
the value of the US dollar so it now takes $100 paper currency to buy what $1 in gold/silver 'money' would buy in 1912.
Every time the banksters issue too much credit (so they have greater profits from the interest) the economy
overheats and inflation is the result. The way to stop inflation is to reduce creation of credit - which would
reduce the banksters unearned profits. So, instead of doing that directly, the bankster federal reserve increases
interest rates which increases the amounts the banksters STEAL from everyone else.
Banksters cause the problem and everyone else is forced to pay for it in higher interest rates.
This also increases the carrying cost of government debt, which screws the People AGAIN
while the banksters get bigger bonuses.
The entire banking 'industry' is one entirely based on stealing.
They are all looting traitors who deserve the death penalty as accomplices and conspirators in treason.
"Banksters cause the problem and everyone else is forced to pay for it in higher interest rates." They get away with it now because government has given them leave and legal protection since 1913. After over 100 years it's going to be tough to end the scheme especially since ending it depends on the people running it. Or a peoples revolt, but since there aren't many who understand the problem (or care) such revolt is unlikely. More likely a crash and rebuild loop and the next thing is crash. There will be suffering and most will have no idea why.
you'd think they swore it to the demorcrat party
guess most are worried about their pensions....
like the FBI, ATF, ect
Slavery was already economically un-viable by 1860, even in the South. Lincoln (whose wife was a slave owner) passed the great Emancipation Proclamation, which didn't free slaves in he North, but rather, in 'that other country down there'.
Slavery was a propaganda tool, but the real issue was an overbearing and all-controlling Federal government. Like we have now, since the South was defeated.
of the federal propaganda that has been unrelenting in government schools.
We have been conned by the feds about the reasons for secession for over 100 years.
Yes, slavery was bad, but Lincoln was a war criminal who did much worse and we are
still suffering from that tyranny and genocide.
Lincoln was a master of fake news and censorship
(using confinement of those who disagreed in federal prison.)