Who is @Q? (Part Seven: A Story About Reality)

Posted by $ Dobrien 1 year, 1 month ago to Education
23 comments | Share | Flag

We tell ourselves stories in order to live. The princess is caged in the consulate. The man with the candy will lead the children into the sea. The naked woman on the ledge outside the window on the sixteenth floor is a victim of accidie, or the naked woman is an exhibitionist, and it would be "interesting" to know which. We tell ourselves that it makes some difference whether the naked woman is about to commit a mortal sin or is about to register a political protest or is about to be, the Aristophanic view, snatched back to the human condition by the fireman in priest's clothing just visible in the window behind her, the one smiling at the telephoto lens. We look for the sermon in the suicide, for the social or moral lesson in the murder of five. We interpret what we see, select the most workable of the multiple choices. We live entirely, especially if we are writers, by the imposition of a narrative line upon disparate images, by the "ideas" with which we have learned to freeze the shifting phantasmagoria which is our actual experience. – Joan Didion, The White Album

The News is understood to be the Official Story about reality, told honestly, as it happens in real time. We believe in Breaking News. We believe in going live to the devastation. We believe in gravitas and good will. We believe in serious voices, especially those with accents. We believe what we’re seeing is probably important and that’s why they’re showing it to us. We believe the job of The News is to tell us about the most important aspects of our lives. Because we don’t have the time to understand these things for ourselves.

We are told The News is biased toward the truth and we call that objectivity. We treat objectivity as an unreachable goal that is nonetheless worth striving for, or hinting at, or at least talking about sometimes. Because objectivity is unreachable, we have stopped demanding it from The News.

We now correctly perceive all media as biased in some way, but we stop at the left/right, Democrat/Republican biases. We rarely calculate the effects of bias due to political influence or the agendas of media magnates, except insofar as they relate to the left/right, Democrat/Republican bias. We assume that what we’re seeing or reading is a picture of reality. We base our points of debate on perceived differences in our perspectives, in the way we view reality. We are shown, through dramatized bickering on television News shows, that our most significant differences are superficial, assuming we all want the same things. If we are good people, that is.

Varying reinterpretations of reality on The News disputed the necessity of “vaccine” mandates, but agreed that we shouldn’t worry about the legality of mandates or the need to preserve our human rights. The News agreed that, regardless, the “vaccine” was very safe and effective.

In each varying reinterpretation of reality presented by The News, the one constant is the safety and efficacy of the “vaccine,” despite the overwhelming empirical evidence that the “vaccine” is neither safe nor effective. Every story about reality premised on this false claim works to construct one’s own false reality.

In the false reality, very good people accepted that mandates might be legal somehow, even though they’re not. They accepted that regardless of legality, the moral question scientific question of the mandates’ necessity should override the rights of dissenters. They accepted that believing The Science meant saying things like, “If it saves just one life, it is worth it,” just before closing Instagram, rather than examining scientific material and listening to a wide range of experts before making a life-changing decision. With safety and effectiveness taken as a given, and the legal and moral arguments tossed aside in favor of The Science, all that’s left is an unsophisticated and superficial argument about the extent of one’s authoritarianism.

In reality, the “vaccines” are neither safe nor effective. They destroy human immune systems and lead to far worse outcomes across the board. They do not save lives and they have not. Their acceptance did not restore the freedoms stripped from the people.

In the false reality, very good people are debating whether these same “vaccines” should be required for infants. It will give them a lifetime of “protection”, says The News. In the false reality, parents brag on Instagram about “protecting” their children. When their children come down with myocarditis, parents are still grateful that the child’s case of covid wasn’t worse, thanks to the vaccine. It did not prevent their child from getting covid, and it produced a life-threatening heart condition, but it must’ve helped somehow.

In reality, children do not need protection from a disease that cannot harm them and has not. Otherwise-healthy children do not die from covid in reality. In reality, children are dying as a direct result of their parents’ thoughtlessness and neglect.

Historians will not make a distinction between ancient societies sacrificing children to a false god and our modern society sacrificing children to The Science, as told to them by The News, received through a series of screens, dumbed-down enough for anyone to understand it. There is no distinction to be made.
SOURCE URL: https://imyourmoderator.substack.com/p/who-is-q-part-seven-a-story-about?s=r

Add Comment


All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by mccannon01 1 year, 1 month ago
    +1 for each part of the 7 part series! Well written rant, if I may call it such, as it should be a shouted expose' for all to hear. The collusion of "The Science" and "The News" to present a false narrative in attempting to sneer "conspiracy theory" regarding so many current events is nicely presented. I don't know who Q is/was either, but it sure looks like he/she/it got it right too many times to just shrug off.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 1 year, 1 month ago
      ThanQ for taking the time to read it.
      As you know I have been an anon since Feb 2018.
      Not so anonymous here though. Trump , Q , the anons , Patriots and Putin have been under a constant barrage of media attacks . They must be over the target. I do know that Q might be a he or a she but not an it. I know it is not artificial intelligence because Q exhibited compassion and
      Love , I computer is incapable of that, imho.
      I hope this gets the same interest as my Union Pacific post.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by mccannon01 1 year, 1 month ago
        I included "it" because as far as I know Q may be a board or group of individuals (Quorum of patriots, if you will) working in concert as opposed to an individual he or she. I agree, no AI could be Q!
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 1 year, 1 month ago
          Yup very good point , as in reality this is a very well collaborated Quorum of Patriots. I love this a “Quorum of Patriots”. Several years ago when I started hearing of memes for the first time , the term was that an idea , thought , even a mood
          Could spread rapidly through society almost like wind.
          An example of what was being discussed and how memes came into it was trying to find out why many major discoveries , innovations , and inventions occurred round the globe simultaneously. Other considerations taken was Einstein saying his most profound insights came during meditation. Long story short when I found Q and the anons discussions on the chans, I was elated to find people thinking about and talking about everything and more of what I’d been saying to dead ears for years. It actually made me think of memes. Not the memes (photo and message) that we know today. lol and behold the memes that Carl and I frequently post were born there.
          See the memes were weapons of the truth seekers because the AI on social media had trouble censoring them . The computer could not identify the words due to the photo image.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by bsudell 1 year, 1 month ago
          I heard that Q is the Bush Family. They wrote it. Anyone have any information on that?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ 1 year, 1 month ago
            That is total bullshit.
            I have read most of the nearly 5000 Q posts.
            I have also read nearly that many uninformed opinions as well. An analogy To me , most all are like they held Atlas Shrugged in their hands yet never read a page but “know” and have strong opinions of its content. I have seen that opinion on this board as well.
            Actually I suspect you didn’t read this 7 part series either.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by bsudell 1 year, 1 month ago
              Actually, I have not read it. Just saw it today. Printed the 1st 5 articles in the series, but then it did not give me access to Article 6 or 7. But, I listen to a lot of people who known a lot about what is going on. When reading Q, I always wondered who is writing this. I hoped it was the good guys, but the bad guys have lots of inside information, too, especially the bushes. Just wanted to see what others knew. By the way, it's always good to give some logical explanation to what you are saying. Insults really don't work. Where are YOU getting your information and what lead you to believe that your information was correct.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by $ 1 year, 1 month ago
                Sorry no intent to insult you, I have done the homework. Also you are responding on post 7,
                Tap the title and it will take you there.
                Here is a Q posts that mentions the Scherff
                Family (name changed) to Bush.

                117 Nov 6 2017
                Why was the arrest of Alwaleed and others important?
                How is Alwaleed and BO tied to HUMA?
                Why did Alwaleed finance BO pre-political days?
                Why did Alwaleed finance BO pre-political days?
                What is HUMA? Define.
                What book was BO caught reading?
                Why was this immediately disregarded as false?
                What is ‘Post-American World by Fareed Zakaria’?
                Why is this relevant?
                Why would the President of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA be reading this book?
                What church did BO attend as pre-POTUS?
                Who was BO’s mentor?
                How is Alwaleed and HRC connected?
                Who was HRC’s mentor?
                How is Alwaleed and BUSH Sr./Jr. connected?
                What occurred post 9-11?
                What war did we enter into?
                What was the purpose and disclosures given re: justification?
                Who financed 9-11?
                Why, recently, are classified 9-11 pages being released?
                What just occurred in SA?
                What FOIA docs are being publicly released (recently)?
                Why is this relevant?
                What information is contained within these c-releases?
                Why is C Wray important with regards to these releases?
                What does money laundering mean?
                What is the single biggest event that can generate many nation states to payout billions?
                Who audits where the money goes?
                $15,000 for a toothbrush?
                Why did we attack Iraq?
                Who are they?
                What do they specialize in?
                What is oil field service?
                Why is this relevant?
                What ‘senior’ level political officials are affiliated w/ Halliburton?
                What is the primary goal?
                What is the primary mode of influence that drives corruption?
                What does money buy?
                How is this connected to SA?
                How is this connected to Alwaleed?
                How is this connected to LV?
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CaptainKirk 1 year, 1 month ago
    I will suggest that the constant Q "Stand Down... Wait For it... Prosecutions Coming..." were a Psy-Ops against it's followers.

    I will give you that the reason to use a coded language is to prevent AI Detection. People on OTHER boards have identified me because of my USE of capital words for emphasis, and my other styles of writing.

    The downside is that it leaves enough interpretation as to be the "Oracle of Delphi" (If these 2 countries go to war, a great nation will suffer defeat!) is AMBIGUOUS... And regardless, the winner will use the prediction as legitimate proof. LOL.

    So, after all of these messages, and all of these promises. We learn that Barr was NOT a good guy. That 90% of the people Trump surrounded himself with, were CORRUPT. That Q did not warn Trump of this...

    So, I respect YOU and your ANON work. I know you, and I know where your heart is.

    I do not know Q. And nothing of Consequence (IMO), that Q promised us, to keep us hooked has come to pass... (HRC? She will have to write a check... And she is fighting that! While she should be in Jail)
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 1 year, 1 month ago
      Once again. As you state “I don’t know Q”
      It’s like me debating Atlas Shrugged message without reading the book. I see the same thing with Patel patriots Devolution series.
      “It can’t be happening” even though I didn’t read it “I know it’s hopium”. In my opinion that type of dismissal is due to normalcy. The normalcy of these corrupt criminals never being brought to justice. Yet ,that ignores the fact that all the leaders have been corrupt themselves. Me as an uneducated dope
      Will not comment on many posts , because I don’t have any knowledge on said posts.
      I have posted about Q almost from the start 5 years ago. The first dozen posts had virtually zero comments. Same thing I experienced ,when people would say how did our education system
      Fail. I literally posted Norman Dodd’s fantastic interview a dozen times and only had a handful actually look at. I know this forum is filled with above average intelligent folks, but many are still brainwashed and manipulated by the MSM.
      That was evident to me as so many railed against the horrible Putin and his wanton killing of innocent civilians. Trump bad Q bad Patriots bad , Putin bad good grief.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Tavolino 1 year, 1 month ago
        All should watch the Norman Dodd interview if they haven't yet. Reveals much.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 1 year, 1 month ago
          Thank you for that needed endorsement.
          I have stated and posted that for over 6 years here . A few have seen it ....Herb7734 (RIP) , Nickursis , OldUglyCarl and Commander they would agree that everyone should it’s that eye opening. This to Captain Kirk Q said to Trust Barr. Barr set up Special Counsul Durham ,but for optics . Trump being at odds with him has advantages. Same thing with Sessions. Just saying stuff going on that we don’t know about.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  


  • Comment hidden. Undo