Rape? Obviously, that would be a circumstance that the state law should recognize and provide
the victim a solution, such as immediate access to the morning after pill. Surely you recognize that.

If the pill is the only legal solution under state law, then many of the women who currently get
abortions would have to plan for it by ordering pills ahead of time or accept the responsibility
of motherhood (or violate the law against abortion.)

The great majority of morning after pills would likely be used in that manner, not for rape,
which compared to the number of abortions done, is very rare.

Surely you've heard of rape...That's typically when these pills are needed.

Wow, the woman would have to plan ahead. That's an overwhelming effort. [/s]

Because they don't have to put their bodies at risk and have 9 months of massive inconvenience. It's really not complicated. However, if you think they should be allowed to negotiate with the woman to contract for the service of bearing out the pregnancy, that is always an option.

No, this is instituting religion in government, allowing one person's religion to be forced on another . Congratulations, we are a theocracy and an oligarchy.

The good news is, now for dead sure SCOTUS will ignore precedent, and we can be sure the First and Second Amendments are trashed when the progressives finish the inevitable stacking.

Yes, which is a clear violation of the First Amendment.

"proper choice"? Who cares? We do not legislate good judgement.

Do we then force hangovers on people who drink too much, or lung cancer on smokers?

The only basis for this being discussed in government at all is the assertion that an fertilized zygote is a human being, which is 100% religion. Otherwise there is no basis for ANY government involvement. This is an example of government institutionalizing religion.

a fetus has no legal rights to life....change that and you end abortion....until then, you will constantly face this battle....

Right. Only one who supports forcing their views on other people can cheer this judgement.

Simple. Because it allows government force to intrude on our rights, and worse, it is an example of the government instituting one group's religious views into law and forced on another person.

It doesn't matter if the abortion was for rape or a lack of judgement. Arguing that there are ways to avoid pregnancy are identical to arguing that everyone who smokes cigarettes should be forced to have lung cancer.

Me dino thinks all the mind malfunctioning hyper emotional bellyaching is being egged on by behind the curtain political puppeteers (think Deep State) who badly need to create a distraction from such things as inflation, sky high gasoline prices, an open border with overwhelming trafficking that only enriches vicious cartels, a supply chain now so crappy its now hard to even find baby formula to buy and a blathering senile incompetent for a president with Schiff for candidates vying to be a Democrat replacement. It's not going to work out as well as rigging elections.
https://rightandfree.com/news/2022/05...

They have to be taken right away to be effective, however. It's hard enough to find someone who will dispense them now while it's still legal. And, if you have to wait for the USPS to get them to you, there's no way you could get them in time. If you could find someone willing to break the law to get them for you to begin with.

Wonderful choice of words for discussing pregnancy, "Bellyaching". Just to be very clear, the left doesn't give a hoot about the mothers or babies. They are only interested in the control and funding associated with the entire abortion industry.

My body, my choice! You say!
Of course!
Yes, but what is the proper choice?
The proper choice is to protect your body from an unwanted pregnancy!
Make that choice before you take your clothes off!
To fail to make that proper choice is to be personally, grossly irresponsible!
Exceptions apply when the pregnancy is due to rape or incest and, in those
cases, earnest attempts should be made to achieve an embryo transfer or
an adoption to a woman seeking a child. Another exception would be in the
case where the embryo is not viable.

They asserted with straight faces that the Florida bill on sex ed in grades K-3 would lead to LGBYQ+ kids being banned from classrooms.

Of course, the White House couldn't find a way to denounce either the leaking of the draft opinion or the doxxing of the Justices.

I’m afraid that dead babies are big business. Both in the act of the murder, but more so in the sale of the remains.

However, if the pills would be sent thru US Mail, the local state might have difficulty in stopping the pills from reaching the recipient, as well as difficulty in prosecuting the doctor writing the Rx. Additionally, such pills could be used by a woman without needing to involve any potential co-conspirator in her decisions.

Thus, it would technically be outlawed but the criminal activities would be hard to stop and/or prosecute. Just look at the difficulty that the government has in trying to stop the importation of illegal drugs in quantity. A couple of pills that could be slipped into an envelope? A slim paperback book? Probably not happening.

The right to privacy is a flawed argument even though the court came to the right decision for the wrong reasons. Similar to the Colorado baker and the gay couple where the ruling was on religious grounds rather than the property owner's rights. Again, right decision, wrong reason. The issue should revolve around liberty (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness), and that is something that no State should be able to violate. While the move towards a Federalist approach is proper, it doesn't give the States, or their elected officials, the right to infringe on liberty. Absent everything mentioned on both sides is the fundamental issue of rights (mother/baby) and its correct definition. Without that, no reasoned discussion is possible and reverts to religion, emotion, or blatant dictates of the government.

The reaction is purposely melodramatic and excessive because the Democrat party is desperately thrashing about for anything that can energize their base before the Fall elections. Up to now, abortion rights has been about number 18 on the list of voter concerns, so the goal is to shove it up to number one if they can. That big a push is sure to have a backlash, as the claims get ever more excessive and irrational.

Listen (if you can without gagging) to the left's message that this is only the first shot across the bow, with bans on gay marriage next. I haven't yet heard that they anticipate making transsexual surgeries illegal, but I'm sure we'll hear of it. I have heard that the Republican Nazis plan on reinstating bans on interracial marriage too, as the left strains credibility to and beyond any rational limit.

I personally find abortion to be abhorrent but I want it to remain legal as if it were illegal those that desire one will find a way and that is worse. Wish there were a way to bring back personal responsibility and shame for bad behavior.

Immaculate "contraception"???

I'm not familiar with that instance.

There are million of stupid and lazy people in this world. And the Fook like rabbits.

conception:
the action of conceiving a child or of a child being conceived:
"Contraception" is prevention of conception.

Actually, that pill would also be outlawed because it is considered a medical abortion.

Ever watch Gosnell?...big money in murder for hire..that is what abortion is and PPH is selling baby parts and they are no different then that old freak...good ole catholics stand in front of a priest open their hands taking the body of our Lord into their own while drinking in his blood either as grape juice or wine all the while knowing their bank accounts are growing from the evil they are paid to continue..just one way...the worse way!