Elon Musk = Hank Reardon?
Your thoughts? This time it's not steel. It's freedom of speech. The steel equivalent, IMO, was Big Pharma and, for the most part, the Science Institute won that one. "When their fat little comforts are threatened you can be sure that science is the first thing men will abandon." That was about 15 years ago, starting with Simpsonwood and continuing on today. Watch how the establishment goes after Musk, now... Already similar, IMO.
Rearden was another who was not 100% rational, but would make an interesting dinner guest
One thing thats certain- Elon isnt just going to roll over, Twitter makes no profits so its not a very viable business. People like the idea of "tweeting" (you can be whoever you want
to be), but I cant see that twitter is that difficult to duplicate.
Agree about the science. The key to judging the reliability of alleged experts is to follow the money. Fauci owns big shares of both the Pfizer and Moderna patents and stands to make billions if everyone is forced to take the shot.
My problem with it is that THAT'S MY MONEY he's used to get rich! Do I get a dividend for it? Any compensation? No. Government appropriated that money from my pocket at the point of a gun, then went on to give it to people like Musk. Solar panel manufacturers. Traders in "green energy credits." And many, many more. All profiting from MY tax dollars.
Just because a "law" is written does not make that law moral. Just because Musk isn't going to get prosecuted for his actions doesn't mean I have to condone them.
Load more comments...