Bezmenov's Steps (Ideological Subversion) - We are infested, how to disinfect?

Posted by deleted 3 years, 3 months ago to Politics
61 comments | Share | Flag

Summary Quote:

“Only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage and such. The other 85% is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion or active measures [meaning] psychological warfare… What it basically means is to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that, despite the abundance of information, no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interests of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.”

1-Demoralization (Bezmenov claims that the USSR was surprised at how easy this phase was in the US.)
2-Destabilization
3-Crisis
4-Normalization


All Comments

  • Posted by 3 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes the communists love to talk about religious inspired wars and ignore the communist exterminations of people.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 3 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes! No more titles like "American Jobs Act And For Other Purposes." Get rid of that And for other purposes phrase and they can't sneak any more.

    I saw an MTG video recently, she was talking about how despite being on no committees, she still has power.

    When bills come to the floor, she asks for the votes to be recorded. She said there were 28 bills on the floor, but when she asked for Yeas and Nays, all of a sudden there were only 5 bills on the floor. Evidently 23 bills were not worth Congress officially signing their name to.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 3 years, 3 months ago
    “The most difficult and at the same time the simplest answer to the subversion, is to start it at the process of demoralization and even before. It’s to bring the society back to religion. Something that you cannot touch, or eat, or put on yourself. Something that rules society… and preserves it.

    “Have you ever met a person who would sacrifice his life, freedom for truth [he writes ‘2 + 2 = 4′ on a chalkboard’]. I never met someone who did. But millions sacrifice their life, freedom, comfort for things like God… Something which is not material moves society and helps it to survive. And the other way around. The moment we turn to this [2 + 2 = 4] and make it a guiding principle of our life and existence, we die. Even though this [math] is true and this [religion] you cannot prove.”


    While at first glance this may seem like a clever tactic, it presupposes two fundamentally flawed assumptions commonly made by the (atheistic) communist: first, that religion is unverifiable and second (as a consequence) that it is therefore false. The flaw in this supposition is somewhat ironic by the very claims made in the paragraph above regarding guiding principles and action. The author (Bezmenov) asserts paradoxically both that religiously-motivated action is more potent and yet less effective. The religious objector points out that the communist is admitting that his/her philosophy is a lazy philosophy while the "religious" philosophy is one of action in which the works of the philosophy speak to its verity.

    The other portion which is interesting in its absurdity is the presupposition that religion is separate and apart from the communist mindset itself: the dissassociation of a political theory as a basis for society being substantially different from a "religious" theory. This is a disingenuous and prejudicial argument of means rather than substance. Society is always going to be based on some kind of ruling philosophy. The primary difference lies in the selection of such a philosophy and its effects on its adherents. An objective comparison between social philosophies looks at outcomes not just theories and this is where communism's dismal record blackens its own doorstep.

    (As a side note, it is also interesting that Bezmenov is enthusiastic to point out the number of deaths caused by religion while omitting the fact that communist nations in the 20th century slaughtered more than 100 million people - the vast majority their own citizens.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 3 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I would suggest two changes to the way that Congress may consider bills. First is a mandatory preamble to the bill stating its Constitutional authority, i.e. which clause or explicit authority granted by the Constitution is being referenced as justification for the action. Second (and many States actually have this) is that each bill may only take up a single topic.

    The first item forces legislators to familiarize themselves with the Constitution and declare the legal premise on which they are acting. This makes it much easier to challenge a law as unConstititional in court. The second eliminates these massive spending bills which invariably include all kinds of earmarks and carveouts.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 3 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hmmmm. Work in progress. Libs think the Constitution is a work in progress. Maybe we could fool them.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Commander 3 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I do not register or tag my vehicles or carry insurances on them any longer.
    I have Right to Travel jurisdictional papers that prove this under law. I do not require "privilege" from The State as a private citizen on public roads [not] involved in commerce.

    When I was working over the road these licensures were required under the Uniform Commercial Code.

    Know your jurisdiction well in case you go to court.

    A friend of mine extricated himself from the Fed and State taxes under UCC jurisdiction...until... he was working under the newly "Federalized" banks after 2008 Dodd-Frank was passed. It's about a 2 year process to extricate. You give up all claim to SSI and Medicare as result.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Commander 3 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hard to approve and easy to rescind. Leave the US Constitution as base and the States cover all the variables.
    Income tax, SSI, Unaffordable Care Act, etc, would be different or not exist. It's the benevolent anarchist in me.

    Optimum would be a formal, objective philosophical construct, through which the entire US Constitution was based. All interpretations are weighed and weighted through the philosophy and not legal precedent. A work in progress.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 3 years, 3 months ago
    We have to stop paying them to build our squirrel cage. Just stop running on it. It will stop turning.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 3 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Maybe 67% as well for removing legislation, we don't want a simple majority tearing things down, either. I like this though.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Commander 3 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Had an idea on legislation.
    75% vote yes to change Constitution
    67% vote yes to add legislation through a bill
    51% vote yes to remove legislation

    That should slow things down a bit.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Commander 3 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    A-woke-n this morn to the same thing on another feed.
    Passed it on to all the active members of my consortium.

    Every time we post a statistic or difference we get factioning to argue about. This is what keeps us in the Agenda's "squirrel cage".
    Reply | Permalink  
    • Aeronca replied 3 years, 3 months ago
  • Posted by Dobrien 3 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I admire your discipline. I am glad I’ve had an amazing life with trials and tribulations these almost 65 years. If that’s how I die it would be a pretty rare occurrence. I am more apt to move to a more rural area in the future to reduce the risk further. It’s a tough move though having lived here 45 years. I too have considered the adrenaline and surprise of a home invasion.
    Don’t know how I would react in that nightmare.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 3 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    F.A.K.E. News is too good for these pathogen traitors . Obama passed a law allowing propaganda. Time to repeal it and any immunity.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Commander 3 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I'm stocked well. Don't need a grocery if expletive happens.
    After this fall harvest I'll be stocked to early 2025.
    Within the consortium of 100 people, we have all the skills and materials available to easily maintain early 19th C livelihood. It's actually easier because we have seed stock and livestock in perpetuity, and keep a very wide displacement of locations. Low profile.

    Last weekend a 50# bag of rolled oats was $36.50 on Fri and $42.75 on Sat. Big increases an the co-op too. Last years buying wheat at $2.75/bush and latest $11.00. We have stored seed for 80 acre for two years without harvests.

    The cities will get hit hard. My rural area participation will increase by factor of 10 within a few months of hardship. We'll have excess to sell at a really high price....their indentureship !!!!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 3 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I was browsing patriotsupply today at buy-dems mention of food shortage being real. But he didn't say not-a-joke. So is it another lie?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 3 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That's beautiful. Hey my Dad started off in a technical high school, became a machinist, went into the Army, became an IBM engineer by night school, no certs either. He did pretty well.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 3 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, from the Hebrew letter "Shin" which looks like the Vulcan hand symbol. It's the first letter of the word SHalom which means Hello, peace, goodbye. Fairly close to Live long and prosper. As a greeting or parting. Leonard Nemoy is Jewish.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Commander 3 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I am actually working on that. An objective curriculum to start teaching at age 7-9
    I taught my niece, 7, on not initiating force when she got frustrated with a little teasing I was initiating. When frustrated she was defaulting to raising her hand to hit me. It was real easy to explain that I had a lot more experience so I could confuse her. And her part was to step back and ask questions and try to figure out how I was doing this. Now she squints at me....can see the mental wheels spinning ..and she walks away and thinks. She forms her questions very well 2 years later. Her language skills are way ahead of her age peers as a result.

    I can duplicate this in a lot of environments now.

    With all the exchanges we've had, to let you know, I've no college education. A vocation of industrial maintenance, engineering, design with no certifications. Over 35 years owning my own manufacturing businesses.
    Think it's oxymoronic? I'm to skinny to be an oxy-moron! LOL!
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo