"Buy-dem Sells Alaska Back To Russia So America Can Start Drilling For Oil There Again" - But The Truth Isn't Funny. Moron Tyrant Buydem Is Sucking Up To Venezuelan Commie Dictator Maduro
Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 1 month ago to Government
OK, that title is humor from the Babylon Bee. https://babylonbee.com/news/biden-sel...
Commentary below from Joannenova.com.au ...
"Joe Biden needs to stop buying oil and gas from the Russian dictator, but rather than getting it from the US or Canada he’s talking to a dictator in Venezuela.
President Biden is scrambling to contain soaring oil prices, which closed at more than $123 a barrel on Monday. It speaks volumes about this Administration that it’s seeking help from Vladimir Putin’s client in Venezuela and our estranged Saudi allies rather than U.S. shale producers or our Canadian friends.
The Saudis and UAE are the only OPEC members that appear to have spare capacity, but they’ve rebuffed Mr. Biden’s pleas to increase supply. One reason is they don’t want to alienate Mr. Putin, who has become a power broker in the Middle East. Mr. Biden should never have alienated the Saudis, but we’d be much better off if he simply encouraged U.S. energy production.
Ed Morrisey explains why the Democrats keep getting blamed for high gas prices:
The problem isn’t that “Big Oil” wants to keep production low. It’s that Joe Biden, Hassan, and the rest of Senate Democrats have made it clear for years that they want to force “Big Oil” out of business entirely. They’d rather put money in the hands of Iranian terrorists and Putin’s imperial army than put it on the household tables of American oil workers. Even the sight of Russians targeting civilians in Ukraine hasn’t changed their calculus on their opposition to American production of fossil fuels as a necessity for strategic leverage in a very dangerous world.
The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board slams Biden and Democrats for seeing oil from malevolent dictators in Tehran and Caracas rather than in the good ol’ USA. It makes no sense from a security perspective, nor from an economic perspective:
Easing Venezuelan sanctions would be a strategic blunder that provides a financial lifeline to Mr. Maduro while doing little to ease the oil price spike. Venezuelan oil companies say they can increase production by several hundred thousand barrels a day in eight months. The war in Ukraine may be over by then. …
Shale producers can increase production twice as fast as Venezuelan oil companies, and the profits would go to U.S. workers and shareholders rather than another dictatorship.
The anti gas and oil thing was never about the weather, and not about CO2 either. It’s not about the workers, the voters, or the environment either. Just power and money."
Commentary below from Joannenova.com.au ...
"Joe Biden needs to stop buying oil and gas from the Russian dictator, but rather than getting it from the US or Canada he’s talking to a dictator in Venezuela.
President Biden is scrambling to contain soaring oil prices, which closed at more than $123 a barrel on Monday. It speaks volumes about this Administration that it’s seeking help from Vladimir Putin’s client in Venezuela and our estranged Saudi allies rather than U.S. shale producers or our Canadian friends.
The Saudis and UAE are the only OPEC members that appear to have spare capacity, but they’ve rebuffed Mr. Biden’s pleas to increase supply. One reason is they don’t want to alienate Mr. Putin, who has become a power broker in the Middle East. Mr. Biden should never have alienated the Saudis, but we’d be much better off if he simply encouraged U.S. energy production.
Ed Morrisey explains why the Democrats keep getting blamed for high gas prices:
The problem isn’t that “Big Oil” wants to keep production low. It’s that Joe Biden, Hassan, and the rest of Senate Democrats have made it clear for years that they want to force “Big Oil” out of business entirely. They’d rather put money in the hands of Iranian terrorists and Putin’s imperial army than put it on the household tables of American oil workers. Even the sight of Russians targeting civilians in Ukraine hasn’t changed their calculus on their opposition to American production of fossil fuels as a necessity for strategic leverage in a very dangerous world.
The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board slams Biden and Democrats for seeing oil from malevolent dictators in Tehran and Caracas rather than in the good ol’ USA. It makes no sense from a security perspective, nor from an economic perspective:
Easing Venezuelan sanctions would be a strategic blunder that provides a financial lifeline to Mr. Maduro while doing little to ease the oil price spike. Venezuelan oil companies say they can increase production by several hundred thousand barrels a day in eight months. The war in Ukraine may be over by then. …
Shale producers can increase production twice as fast as Venezuelan oil companies, and the profits would go to U.S. workers and shareholders rather than another dictatorship.
The anti gas and oil thing was never about the weather, and not about CO2 either. It’s not about the workers, the voters, or the environment either. Just power and money."
We all saw how effective that is in the past 109 years.
They don't care if we authorize it. They don't even read the spending bills (because then they wouldn't have that excuse, however idiotic.)
They are scum.
There is no peaceful solution, imo.
The solution is to gut the government of its power and gut the corrupt traitors literally.
Second, it severely undermines the threat of Impeachment and removal of a sitting President because real power doesn't change hands, e.g. it doesn't change from one political party to another. Having the President removed only to have the Vice President from the same party take over is rather pointless when the Presidential candidates select their own running-mates.
The British system is interesting but VERY different than ours. Once a party is in power in Great Britain, they can do pretty much whatever they want and the minority party has no choice but to sit and watch and complain. In the US system, even the minority party has power - especially in the Senate. In the British system, a vote of No Confidence doesn't change the party in control necessarily, it simply means that the Prime Minister and his/her cabinet is forced to resign and they pick a new one. But it's still the same Parliament who selects the new Prime Minister - not the public. And the British Parliament has more than two parties, meaning that a ruling coalition (which usually is forced to include a minority faction) has to maintain that coalition in order to rule, so in the case of a contested Parliament, the ruling power has to rule near the center rather than on the fringes where the US Democratic Party has drifted.
(I use 65 because of the several squishy Republicans in the Senate like Murkowski, Romney, etc.)
https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/b...
Or would those "idiots" be our own enemies of our Republic both foreign and most especially domestic?
The real "idiots" would be all the clueless libtards who actually believe all of that illogical Schiff.
Yes, Oscammer would have done the same thing.
- Shubham Garg, founder and CEO of White Tundra Investments
Yes, your tax dollars going to restore Communist Venezuela's petroleum industry (and enrich their dictator) instead of the US petroleum industry.
Oust the entire bureaucracy for treason.