Grading the Governors: Who Locked Down and Who Opened?

Posted by freedomforall 2 years, 2 months ago to Politics
3 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"We were granted the greatest scientific experiment COVID-19 could offer (except for the cruise ships, which provided the original scientific experiment and was ignored). Many states had (and have) wildly different policies during the pandemic. The question we need to ask and data we need to study is, if the tight restrictions worked, did they result in fewer COVID-19 and moreover total excess deaths?

Comparing one state to another, cherry-picking low-impacted Vermont to high-impacted Mississippi is dumb; they are unlike one another in geography and demographics, and importantly, obesity.
...
The least restricted states throughout the pandemic include (no cherry picking here, these are the least) include the Dakotas, Florida, Nebraska, and Oklahoma. Not one of those states are in the top fifteen in COVID-19 deaths per capita.

The takeaway from all of this is that tight restrictions had no measurable impact on COVID-19 deaths. We need to understand that key messaging to those at risk (the elderly and obese; if these alone were removed from the COVID-19 deaths, there was no pandemic, a mathematical term requiring 7.4% of all deaths attributed to a new illness), protecting and advising them to be extra cautious while the population at large continues to function."
SOURCE URL: https://brownstone.org/articles/grading-the-governors-who-locked-down-and-who-opened/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by Dobrien 2 years, 2 months ago
    That’s all very interesting...they did what the could with phony numbers to begin with. Even so they were able to show the lockdowns and remote schooling were a complete and utter disaster.
    As far as the worst performing Govs, that was interesting as they are the five murderers (there were more) . One of them, was The “Gold Standard” for COVID actions ha of course Cummo and his bro Fredo lol . So ,Is it just me that is of the mindset that
    Any statistics of this crime against humanity starts with the most basic flaw. That is a test that intentionally gave false positives, who knows how many ever had it or not. The test counts are full of wildly exaggerated #’s. Another thing that is bullshit is the # of deaths. Let’s see , if we want to
    Measure an outbreak of illness, and we don’t know how many were infected or how many succumbed to it , what in the world are we giving any credence to the statistical results.
    I can tell you one thing we can determine. The number of human beings (mothers fathers sisters brothers friends and relatives ) that were murdered with the remdesivir + , fda/cdc protocols as standard care (sick demons) treatment for positive captives. Captives, yes no family was allowed to see or advocate for many many of the VICTIMS.
    FYI remdesivir’s use was halted a few years back
    When 31% or so receiving it for Ebola of all things
    Had organ failure starting with the kidneys. Then a build up of fluids in the lungs some dexamethizine (sp) to reduce breathing ability and
    Wholla. Put on Ventilator to die. May God Bless their families. Any way great post! 👍🏻
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo