Vaxx Trial Fraud: Pfizer Whistleblower Exposes How Your Government Is Captured By Multinational Corporations
Posted by freedomforall 2 years, 4 months ago to Politics
Excerpt:
"If you had a nickel for every time some bureaucrat or corporate news actor promised the COVID “vaccines” are “safe and effective,” you’d have a lot of fiat currency (spend it while you still can before inflation renders it valueless – or, better, convert it to an un-fuckable alternative like gold or Bitcoin).
The COVID “vaccines” are not actual “vaccines,” which stimulate the synthesis of targeted antibodies using pieces of dead viruses. Rather, the COVID “vaccines” are actually first-generation experimental gene therapies sponsored by Bill Gates. This is evidenced by the CDC’s recent overnight editing of the official definition of “vaccine” to accommodate mRNA gene therapy.
...
The Truth About the ‘FDA Approval’ Racket
As previously reported by The Daily Bell, we’ve known that the “safe and effective” mantra is nonsense propaganda since the first unfiltered data from legitimate research groups (i.e., ones not on Pfizer’s payroll) began to roll in.
But now, thanks to a courageous whistleblower (who, incidentally, lost her job for her bravery), we have a look behind the curtain to see how Pfizer got its coveted FDA stamp of approval.
Via British Medical Journal:
“A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group [the researchers tasked with vetting the vaccine safety and efficacy] has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial….
‘There’s just a complete lack of oversight of contract research organisations and independent clinical research facilities,’ says Jill Fisher, professor of social medicine at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine.”
Read the article in its entirety, which explicitly and painstakingly details the “significant,” “numerous,” “wide-scale” violations of established research protocols throughout the trial process."
"If you had a nickel for every time some bureaucrat or corporate news actor promised the COVID “vaccines” are “safe and effective,” you’d have a lot of fiat currency (spend it while you still can before inflation renders it valueless – or, better, convert it to an un-fuckable alternative like gold or Bitcoin).
The COVID “vaccines” are not actual “vaccines,” which stimulate the synthesis of targeted antibodies using pieces of dead viruses. Rather, the COVID “vaccines” are actually first-generation experimental gene therapies sponsored by Bill Gates. This is evidenced by the CDC’s recent overnight editing of the official definition of “vaccine” to accommodate mRNA gene therapy.
...
The Truth About the ‘FDA Approval’ Racket
As previously reported by The Daily Bell, we’ve known that the “safe and effective” mantra is nonsense propaganda since the first unfiltered data from legitimate research groups (i.e., ones not on Pfizer’s payroll) began to roll in.
But now, thanks to a courageous whistleblower (who, incidentally, lost her job for her bravery), we have a look behind the curtain to see how Pfizer got its coveted FDA stamp of approval.
Via British Medical Journal:
“A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group [the researchers tasked with vetting the vaccine safety and efficacy] has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial….
‘There’s just a complete lack of oversight of contract research organisations and independent clinical research facilities,’ says Jill Fisher, professor of social medicine at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine.”
Read the article in its entirety, which explicitly and painstakingly details the “significant,” “numerous,” “wide-scale” violations of established research protocols throughout the trial process."
An accusation of fraud is made, implication are big and serious.
Is there a thorough investigation, decisions put on hold? No.
What happens (as usual nowadays) is that the woman who stood up to the fraud, and complained to the right channels, was ignored. She went public, then got dismissed very fast!
This alone should give the public a picture of the data put out by big pharma.