COVID Vaccinations Do Not Stop Transmission and Fail In Their Primary Goal - Scientific Study in Lancet

Posted by freedomforall 1 month, 3 weeks ago to Science
2 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"In the space of three weeks in Britain, 100 Covid cases were reported among individuals who are 60 or older. Out of those infections, 89.7% of people were fully vaccinated, while 3.4% were unvaccinated.

More concerning for researchers, in Israel, an outbreak that infected multiple healthcare workers and patients, as well as their family members, came from a fully vaccinated hospital patient.

Backing up the fears expressed in the study, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) currently lists four of the five areas across the US with the highest percentage of fully vaccinated individuals as high transmission counties.

Researchers warned that decision makers must acknowledge the risk that is still posed by vaccinated individuals.

"It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures."

The research released in The Lancet comes as countries weigh imposing Covid vaccine mandates to help protect citizens from the spread of the omicron variant and a potential resurgence in case numbers. Greece became the first nation in the EU to implement a Covid vaccine requirement, threatening all over-60s who don’t get the jab with a monthly fine."
SOURCE URL: https://www.rt.com/news/541900-mass-vaccination-covid-transmission/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by Lucky 1 month, 3 weeks ago
    German study and data, the author says same message from US, UK, and Israel.
    This is very interesting, however, remember that cases, may not be the real problem - if - like colds/flu it is only a few days of discomfort. The newer variants seem to be even less deadly tho' they spread fast. What really matters are hospitalizations and deaths.


    Side issue, what the judge said to the hospital when they said they will not give ivermectin:
    - against their policies
    - there may be side effects
    - to order use of this medication would be judicial over-reach

    https://rescue.substack.com/p/a-judge...

    Very nice put down of the bullies.
    -I am not telling the hospital what to do, just to stand aside ....

    Patient was on a ventilator. Recovered.
    Very interesting and important, it means-
    ivermectin has some effectiveness at very late stage.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 1 month, 3 weeks ago
      This case is very similar to the case in NZ where the family had to get a court order to get their father treated with Vitamin C. It saved his life and the medical 'experts' still wouldn't accept the results.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo