A regime that refuses to acknowledge and submit to lawful orders is a regime that can rightly be regarded as wholly unlawful and thus, illegitimate.
Posted by freedomforall 2 years, 5 months ago to Politics
Excerpt:
"When the law givers ignore the law, is there any obligation to obey the law-givers?
This question arises in the wake of the Biden regime – the right word, as it conveys the fundamental essence of the thing, as in capo regime . . . as in gang of thugs – announcing it doesn’t give a tinker’s damn for the recent federal court stay of its order to private employers of 100 or more to require all employees submit to the Jab – else be Jabbed, themselves, with extortionate fines applied by OSHA.
Which lacks lawful jurisdiction to decree such a thing.
Never mind, moreover, that the capo regime hasn’t bothered to shepherd legislation through the “democratic process” – leg-humped when convenient – but rather simply ordered the mass Jabbing.
And the mass fining.
This being of a piece with the orders of the Don, duly enforced by the capos.
Hence, regime.
Well, the Fifth Circuit of Appeals – which is a court and a federal one, at that – with legal/constitutional authority to bind the power of the federal government – issued a stay.
Which means that the Jabs cannot lawfully be required – or the fines applied – until after due process of law has elaborated.
Full stop. For now, at least.
This is the way it once worked when this country was governed by laws.
Some – okay, many – of these laws were not good laws. But they were at least laws – the “at least” being a reference to the fact of some degree of process and accountability rather than the simple – do as you are told, because we tell you to do it – governed the law.
And bound the law-givers.
Remember, the president is – at least in theory – an executive. The chief executive, to be sure. But he is not – by law – a giver of law. His constitutional authority is to see that the laws are faithfully enforced.
Not to enforce his orders."
"When the law givers ignore the law, is there any obligation to obey the law-givers?
This question arises in the wake of the Biden regime – the right word, as it conveys the fundamental essence of the thing, as in capo regime . . . as in gang of thugs – announcing it doesn’t give a tinker’s damn for the recent federal court stay of its order to private employers of 100 or more to require all employees submit to the Jab – else be Jabbed, themselves, with extortionate fines applied by OSHA.
Which lacks lawful jurisdiction to decree such a thing.
Never mind, moreover, that the capo regime hasn’t bothered to shepherd legislation through the “democratic process” – leg-humped when convenient – but rather simply ordered the mass Jabbing.
And the mass fining.
This being of a piece with the orders of the Don, duly enforced by the capos.
Hence, regime.
Well, the Fifth Circuit of Appeals – which is a court and a federal one, at that – with legal/constitutional authority to bind the power of the federal government – issued a stay.
Which means that the Jabs cannot lawfully be required – or the fines applied – until after due process of law has elaborated.
Full stop. For now, at least.
This is the way it once worked when this country was governed by laws.
Some – okay, many – of these laws were not good laws. But they were at least laws – the “at least” being a reference to the fact of some degree of process and accountability rather than the simple – do as you are told, because we tell you to do it – governed the law.
And bound the law-givers.
Remember, the president is – at least in theory – an executive. The chief executive, to be sure. But he is not – by law – a giver of law. His constitutional authority is to see that the laws are faithfully enforced.
Not to enforce his orders."
It appears the only way we can divest ourselves of bureaucratic tyranny is to gain enough elected power to enforce radical changes in government agencies. Those without credible connections to constitutionally permitted powers should be eliminated entirely, and the others subject to extreme reduction in authority and personnel.
Hang them.
"the only way we can divest ourselves of bureaucratic tyranny is to gain enough elected power" What? With the shadow government counting the votes?
I think the chance of a peaceful return to individual liberty is past.
The courts arent really on our side anymore. They are leftist. If biden forces people to get vaccinated, that sets the stage for required booster shots and god knows what else.
After first saying "We can't afford to NOT vaccinate" because of our contracts with the government and the penalties.
The Injunction should have been a reason to delay it. But their answer was "Nope. We are going to stick with firing people over this, TO GET AHEAD OF IT!"
So... basically, we will trample over your rights, to get ahead of an UNLAWFUL request.
I have a friend who will make them fire her. Then file wrongful termination charges, and coercion charges.
BTW, where is the Emergency?
Imagine a Pandemic SO BAD that we are willing to fire 30% of nurses and doctors!
take over the 'illness' care industry completely, to solve the problem that government (and the
AMA and insurance companies) created.
Better to boycott 'illness' insurance and use the services of the fired nurses and doctors.
Note that I don't call it "health" insurance because the goal of it is not 'health', it's illness.
Insurance companies profits increase as medical costs increase because like the gambling
palaces in Vegas, they just 'chip the pot' and parasitically steal from the 'marks.'
It's the Sick Care Industry.
Imagine the Moral Hazard where Doctors are TOLD what Percentage they will be paid, not based ON Patient Satisfaction... But based on % of patients taking Rx Drugs (regardless of side-effects, and other problems).
The doctors have to make a living, and that is MUCH EASIER if you don't rock the boat or ask questions.
Of course, if they find a LIFE SAVING procedure, you can EXPECT the government to outlaw it, or make it impossible to get. (See HQC, IVM).
Further, they will publish BOGUS studies to scare doctors away from it. And call it Horse Dewormer to scare the public away!