10

Johnson and Johnson project veritas

Posted by Dobrien 2 years, 6 months ago to History
14 comments | Share | Flag

Two secretly recorded J&J employees tell the truth.
SOURCE URL: https://gab.com/TonyAx100/posts/107006855365388479


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by DrZarkov99 2 years, 6 months ago
    When even the CDC is starting to resist the rush to universal vaccination, and restricting the suggested (not required or advised) boosters to only the Pfizer, and only for the above 65 or immunocomprimized, that should send a signal that this has little to do with health concerns.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 2 years, 6 months ago
    It occurs to me that the push for all to be vaccinated may also be a case of financial interests in another way.
    The virus has almost certainly been created by research and has been funded by many including the US government, Fauci, Gates, and likely other 'elitists'.
    There is no protection from lawsuits for these villains.
    However, there is protection from lawsuits for them from those who take vaccines.
    A lawyer could blame all the afflictions of those vaccinated on the vaccines which would then transfer blame to Big Pharma alone
    and they can't be sued in the US. (That could place the financial burden on the fedgov which would crush the US and the US dollar. )
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 2 years, 6 months ago
    Are we going to need a military take over of this country to stop this nonsense? I sure wouldn't want to see something like that! But what is the answer?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by lrshultis 2 years, 6 months ago
      How can a military dictatorship not be worse than is happening now? Most people whom I know are having enough liberty to not take time to combat what is happening politically. The great mass of citizens don't see what might happen to the liberty that they have.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 2 years, 6 months ago
      Insurgency can be defined as ‘the organized use of subversion and violence to seize, nullify, or challenge political control of a region.’
      Insurgents seek to subvert or displace the government and completely or partially control the resources and population of a given territory. They do so through the use of force (including guerrilla warfare, terrorism and coercion/intimidation), propa- ganda, subversion and political mobilization. Insurgents fight government forces ONLY to the extent needed to achieve their political aims: their main effort is not to kill counterinsurgents, but rather to establish a competitive system of control over the population, making it impossible for the government to administer its territory and people. Insurgent activity is therefore designed to weaken government control and legitimacy while increasing insurgent control and influence.
      Insurgents require supporters, recruits, safe havens, money, supplies, weapons and intelligence on government actions. A robust insurgency can be waged with the support of just a small percentage of a given population.
      NEXT:

      Counterinsurgency may be defined as ‘comprehensive civilian and military efforts taken to simultaneously defeat and contain insurgency and address its root causes’.
      Q
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ katrinam41 2 years, 6 months ago
        The real insurgents have control over a number of areas, including California, New York, Illinois, and various enclaves across the country in major cities. That makes us citizens the counter-insurgents, but the military, which should be with us, is headed up by insurgents. There is no guarantee that the rank-and-file will follow the Constitution and not their traitorous leaders.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo