THE election, November 2020

Posted by Lucky 1 year, 10 months ago to Ask the Gulch
14 comments | Share | Flag

THE election, November 2020

Gen. Flynn writes about a number of things to consider that strongly suggest, if not actually prove, irregularity. (Rather a mild word, considering).
I think most readers here would be familiar with the case but here it is again as I have a quibble.

10 Indisputable Facts on the 2020 Election That Argue for Audits. The ten points are listed as:

1. Bellwether counties
2. Bellwether states
3. Share of primary votes
4. Incumbents who gain votes win
5. Voter registration by party
6. Down-ballot voting
7. Florida as a key trend indicator
8. Gaining everywhere but losing everything
9. Victory goes to the minority vote-getter
10.“the most secure presidential election in U.S. history”

My quibble-
Point 8. Not completely correct, yes in the House as the R Party had a net gain of 12 (15 up, 3 down), tho' in the Senate, the R Party lost 3 seats, compared with 2018.
I cannot recall seeing the total votes, 2018/2020 by party for the senate.
Would that relate?
What do you think?

Add Comment


All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ BobCat 1 year, 10 months ago
    Too many things happening all at once. They are dragging out the Wuhan Flu as long as possible, creating vax vs unvaxxed dissension , masking conflicts, skewing data, CRT, racism, and censorship of non-party ideaology, just to name a few - all as a distraction to the audits, discussions of fraudulent elections, and the border crisis, etc.
    The left has the fine art of ‘Smoke and
    Mirrors’ perfected to a “T”.
    We are the outsiders wanting to play ball, while the leftists creat crisis upon crisis with zero intent to find a solution.
    And the sheeple have walked away from their God, only to find themselves worshiping at the teat of their new master, the Leftists.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by 1 year, 10 months ago
    Here is point 8. in full:

    8. Gaining everywhere but losing everything: Despite historic strength and gains of Trump in battleground states and battleground counties, Trump “lost.”

    Maricopa County, Arizona, which casts nearly two-thirds of all votes in Arizona, has not voted for the Democratic nominee since it supported Harry Truman in 1948. In 1996, Bob Dole became the first Republican in nearly 50 years to lose Arizona, but he still won Maricopa County.

    Trump carried the county by 3 percentage points in 2016 while receiving fewer votes than Mitt Romney had in the county in 2012. In 2020, Trump set a Republican record for net additional votes in Maricopa County by adding roughly 248,000 from his 2016 performance, only to become the first Republican nominee (and incumbent president) to lose the county in 72 years.

    That was accomplished by Biden’s gain of nearly 338,000 net “new votes” from 2016, which is nearly three times higher than the all-time previous high Democratic vote gain in the county by John Kerry in 2004. Similar record high vote totals and increases for Trump were also eclipsed in 2020 in the states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Nevada and Minnesota, in “losing efforts.”
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Dobrien 1 year, 10 months ago
      I can only say the election fraud was massive and it was accomplished with foreign countries colluding with the d party to retain power at all cost and get rid of their enemy US and we are represented by Trump.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CaptainKirk 1 year, 10 months ago
    I am sure I explained how Dead People Vote.
    It's an accident. Whenever you stuff a ballot, you have to update the Voter Polling Book in order to mark the person as Voted.

    In 2016 there was a Detroit Precinct with more voters than registered voters (That's when the JAMS were brought up).

    In 2020 basically 100% of the dead people voted. Now, simple math. If 2% of your voter roles are dead.
    Lets assume we have 10,000 Ballots cast for dead people in MI.

    Do the math, and that means, they signed in 50 TIMES as many people!
    (Whoa, how? Because with a 2% random spread, you should have to sign in 50 people to accidentally get 1 dead person).

    So, the high end is NOT that 10,000 stuffed ballots (not enough to turn the election).
    But potentially 500,000 ballots were stuffed.

    Now, you could double check this easily, using the maiden names. Because the same rules apply.

    So, at the High End (because statistically they could have had such amazing turnout, they were left with no choice)...

    And finally, coming out of MI the comments that MANY PEOPLE processing the ballots were tossing all the trump ballots by the thousands...

    BUT we must not speak of such obvious things...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 1 year, 10 months ago
    Point 8. Two senate seats were runoffs in GA and the same issues that point to fraud in the POTUS election exist in those elections, namely one large county made up much more than the difference for both senate races and the results should be audited because of the many reports of fraudulent actions.
    (1) The runoffs might even be declared null and void if the election results are audited (and the invalid votes not counted) because the vote victory totals may have been enough to settle the races without any runoffs.
    (2) Many Trump voters boycotted the runoffs because the Nov election was so obviously rigged. Fool me twice shame on me.

    If the 2020 elections are not audited, recounted, and reversed, then armed revolution is the appropriate response.
    The looters deserve to be shown what an insurrection really is.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Andy 1 year, 9 months ago
    In outcome 2 scenario 3, why would Biden stay president if the SCOTUS declared the election invalid?
    In outcome 3 where the SCOTUS sidesteps the issue, who's in charge of the states convention? Why not just declare a new president based on the results of updated electoral college?
    All of this sounds too good to be true.The article says the government should rule in fear of God but God's been thrown out the window, so how will this convention based on the election audits work?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 1 year, 10 months ago
    My viewpoint: 2020 was a test case, with a viral pandemic courtesy of the Chinese cohorts to break the successful Trump economy; the next step was a corrupt election, to see if people would swallow the obvious issues and accept the election of an unlikely candidate; now that the second part has been successful, stretching out the COVID pandemic to retain control as a test for absolute control; the next step will be to exaggerate the COVID situation into a crisis, declaring a national emergency that justifies suspending the 2022 election, retaining power indefinitely.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 1 year, 10 months ago
    Don't forget "We have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics". - Joe Biden
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  


  • Comment hidden. Undo