12

Should All "Attractive" Children Be Disfigured To Eliminate Their Attractiveness Privilege? Should "Attractive" Adults Be Taxed To Reduce Their "Beauty Privilege"?

Posted by freedomforall 2 years, 10 months ago to Ask the Gulch
59 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Should All "Attractive" Children Be Disfigured To Eliminate Their Attractiveness Privilege? Should "Attractive" Adults Be Taxed To Reduce Their "Beauty Privilege"?

Isn't "attractiveness privilege" much easier to "prove" than so-called (unsupportable) white privilege?

Should tall adults have their legs shortened to eliminate their 'height privilege'?


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by $ blarman 2 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    If what I read is true, they're already doing it to themselves by getting rid of their models and replacing them with all manner of unattractiveness. Beached whales do not look good in bathing suits, lingerie, or... anything really.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 2 years, 10 months ago
    Reminds me of a conversation I had with my dad (RIP) many years ago. I had been very successful in the tech stock market prior to the crash and ended up buying a nice 4-bedroom home in a very nice neighborhood a few miles out of town. I miss that place. Anyway, when I pulled up with the moving truck the first time the neighbors came out of their homes to introduce themselves and we all kind of stared at each other because they were all my parents' age and several mentioned I was the same age as their kids, but that their kids couldn't afford to buy in that neighborhood yet. It was odd. I told my dad jokingly, "I think some were mad at me." He jokingly replied, "Hell yeah. I'd be mad at you." Haha...I miss that sense of humor. Man, I paid a lot of taxes back then...but, obviously not enough...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 2 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    We've come a long way from, "Look in your pants. That's what you are."

    I'm guilty. I used to tell my kids, "You're a boy. And, you're going to be a man when you grow up." etc...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by shaifferg 2 years, 10 months ago
    Once upon a time in a galaxy not far away there existed a freedom newspaper (lower case because they earned it) that asked the question often: "Who is going to pull the wagon when everyone wants to ride? They are riding also now, Plenty of opportunities for wagon pullers exist now, but no one can afford the wage required.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by NealS 2 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The NBA and all sports and competitions need to include the LGBTQQIP2SAA (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning, queer, intersex, pansexual, two-spirit (2S), androgynous and asexual) community on their teams? I haven't learned those definitions yet alone know what they do in their bedrooms. Some claim there are 52 genders, and some even claim 70 some now. Personally I still can understand them as With and Without, the only way we should label our restrooms and other places of sexual privacy. Your preference just cannot determine or change the way you piss, only With or Without remains the physical distinction. Restrooms are for pissing, not expressing or showing off your idiosyncrasies or preferences. We don't yet need separate bathrooms for plumbers, cooks, carpenters, real estate agents, maybe lawyers, judges, and all the other personal preferences people claim to be. Also speaking of fairness and prejudice, has anyone noticed there is no W (White), or B (Black), C (Chinese, not to be confused with Canadian), K (Korean), nor any reference to N (Normal), etc. in LGBTQQIP2SAA? Looks funny with the "?" mark, but I'm sure it will be coming soon.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LarryHeart 2 years, 10 months ago
    Should all rational people have a lobotomy to equal the mindless sheeple stupidity of the leftists, socialists and communists?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 2 years, 10 months ago
    Everyone must be black because only black lives matter. Skin pigments can be treated someway to retain a numerical edge for a Woke world conquest.
    Evidently, We The Black People in order to form a more equitable globalist union will be forced to go to war with Europe (who will quickly wimp a surrender) but we will surely end up exchanging nukes with all those stubborn racists in China.
    Then who ever wins will have to exchange nukes with Russia and not necessarily in that order. Take solace in knowing that the end of all humanity will be all of everybody else's fault.
    And know that the planet will eventually heal itself due to being rid of all of its stupid naked ape parasites. For now living in total peace, cockroaches shall inherit the earth.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ brightwriter 2 years, 10 months ago
    And break athletes' legs to eliminate agility privilege, crush hands to eliminate dexterity privilege, do frontal lobotomies to eliminate cognition privilege.... hey, wait! There's no one around any more who can work and support us, so we're all gonna die of starvation!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Radio_Randy 2 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    They're already doing this...look at how skinny and fit actors have been replaced with nearly obese and plain looking people.
    If you need more proof, recall the recent show "Ugly Betty".

    Trouble is, obesity is now being treated as the "new normal" in some venues, which is sad as I just recovered from a heart attack due to...you guessed it, too much weight and too little exercise.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 2 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Read in the middle of the previous century? If taught today it would be preached literally as a plan to be followed.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Orwellian 2 years, 10 months ago
    Lets take it a step, if your measured IQ is out of the normal range your "social score" is adjusted to bring it to "equity". Social score for individuals and ALL organizations will determine their freedom and privilege. Everything will be social scored IQ, beauty, political involvement, charity participation. The data will be accumulated from Social Listening.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ gharkness 2 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And only slightly sideways WRT topic: have you noticed the gorgeous women married to butt-ugly men AND the same in reverse? And they seem to be super happy. At least seem to be, and I have no reason to think they are not...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wmiranda 2 years, 10 months ago
    I bet if that were proposed in California it would be a hotly contested issue, even though foolish in reality.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 2 years, 10 months ago
    The elephant in the room! Can't wait for Hollywood or advertising companies to deal with this for real.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 2 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Beauty is in the eye of the brainwasher. I remember how women's "beauty" has changed since I was young. Fuller figures were the most desirable in the 50's (and earlier), but the media changed the image of beauty to much more slender since then (although desirability of large breasts has been more difficult to change.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 2 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yeah...especially if the very short people will work for a very low wage....That's just like corporate America! I like it. Sure...they won't be effective but that isn't represented in the numbers the bean counters look at.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 2 years, 10 months ago
    That seems to be where all this Equality is headed...they just don't get it, we don't want a milk toast world...WE LIKE DIFFERENCES...it's the spice of life.

    Not to mention, there is no guarantee that Beautiful couples will have beautiful children or visa versa...Take a look around at the most attractive people with the ugliest kids and the butt ugly man and women baring the most beautiful children in the world.

    It is what it is...sameness SUCKS...how would we tell each other apart?...wasn't there a Star Trek episode with this scenario?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 2 years, 10 months ago
    Who gets to decide who is what? Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. Ta da!
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo