12

Should All "Attractive" Children Be Disfigured To Eliminate Their Attractiveness Privilege? Should "Attractive" Adults Be Taxed To Reduce Their "Beauty Privilege"?

Posted by freedomforall 2 years, 10 months ago to Ask the Gulch
59 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Should All "Attractive" Children Be Disfigured To Eliminate Their Attractiveness Privilege? Should "Attractive" Adults Be Taxed To Reduce Their "Beauty Privilege"?

Isn't "attractiveness privilege" much easier to "prove" than so-called (unsupportable) white privilege?

Should tall adults have their legs shortened to eliminate their 'height privilege'?


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 3.
  • Posted by 2 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Wait, Abaco, racial profile isn't enough. People under 5ft 6in should have representation on every NBA team and be paid based on how much desire they have, not on merit or effort. (/s)
    That's how corporations are acting. It doesn't matter if foreign competitors drive them to near bankruptcy. What matters is that every employee gets a certificate of completion for their cubicle wall (and that the fedgov bails them out.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ BobCat 2 years, 10 months ago
    Oh oh, now we will be paying directly to OUC!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 2 years, 10 months ago
    I was thinking today when watching a few minutes of sports...I want the NBA to represent the racial profile of the United States. I want to see Chinese people in there, Greeks, Persians, etc. Same for our Olympic sprinters. America should put its money where its mouth is for the world to see. At the same time...I realized I could have been an Olympic sprinter for Kirabati. I was fast enough to be their top sprinter at one point. Ever see those 100 meter trials? Funny.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 2 years, 10 months ago
    Good gosh, FFA! Let's not give those perpetually offended idiots any more ideas to scrape across the chalkboard!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Arthgallo 2 years, 10 months ago
    on the hand, Victoria's Secret should be "fined" - just sayin
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 2 years, 10 months ago
    I would be taxed to the max for my wife’s beauty and a would get a big refund for my looks. Most likely a breakeven .lol
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo