Why is a Fusion GPS attorney risking court sanctions ? Why have they refused to provide documents the court has ordered? What are they trying to keep hidden?

Posted by freedomforall 2 years, 10 months ago to Politics
0 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"As a reminder, it was Fusion GPS and Glenn Simpson who, along with others, created and spread bogus Trump/Russia dossiers to government officials and the media. This was then used to justify the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance warrants on Carter Page to spy on Page those associated with President Trump.

We previously reported that Alfa Bank filed a motion to compel, asking the Court to require Fusion GPS and Glenn Simpson to produce documents withheld as privileged. These documents included communications with Glenn Simpson and others concerning the false Alfa Bank allegations.

Things have taken a strange turn. Today, attorneys for Plaintiffs (Alfa Bank, et. al) informed the Court that Bill Taylor, an attorney for Fusion GPS, was contacting third parties to establish back-channel lines of communication to start settlement talks - without revealing any documents to the court.

This development is quite significant. During litigation, settlement offers are conveyed through the parties’ attorneys – not through back-channels. It seems that the Alfa Bank Plaintiffs are not willing to settle. By reaching out to the third party, the Fusion GPS attorney seems to be desperate to change their minds.

This leaves us with a question: why would the Fusion GPS attorney violate the rules of conduct – and risk sanctions by the Court?

We have a feeling that Fusion GPS (or its attorneys… or both) are feeling the heat. There are nearly 500 critically important documents that Fusion GPS has allegedly improperly kept from the other side.

What will those documents show?

- May 2016 correspondence among Fusion GPS employees/principals, including Glenn Simpson, regarding their early work on Trump/Russia.


- August 2016 between Fusion GPS and DNC lawyers Perkins Coie.


- The early work on the Carter Page research from July 2016.


Final Thoughts

Fusion GPS has experienced lawyers. They must realize their attempts to withhold these important documents are futile. They must also realize, though, that there was an ethics violation in trying to establish back-channel communications.

Are the internal Fusion GPS communications so damaging that the risk of sanctions was worth the reward of settlement?
SOURCE URL: https://technofog.substack.com/p/why-is-a-fusion-gps-attorney-risking


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP


FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo