Auditors Caught Backdating Voting Machines!
Observers at the Windham, NH audit have seen some things that seem to be very curious. It may be ignorance or it could be criminal. But, either way, it could spark an investigation or better yet, a state-wide audit of the voting. One thing the observers noticed was that auditors had backdated machines under review.
They also say they saw other curious behavior by the auditors.
The Gateway Pundit reported earlier in the week that two of the three auditors had close ties to Nancy Pelosi and Chuckie Schumer.
So, it appears that the fix was in and we don’t know what they did to the machines but I suspect whatever it was, it covered up something they don’t want someone to find out later.
Harry Hursti, Ph.D., has obscured professional relationships with the other two auditors. Hursti exposed the fact in 2005 that the machines that these Diebold memory cards could be easily hacked and manipulated to secretly change vote counts. He also proved that the changed votes would totally undetectable.
Why does he not mention that fact now?
Populist Press reported this evening:
The forensic audit in Windham, New Hampshire is over, but the momentum to keep it alive is just getting started. Late Thursday, Marilyn Todd of NH Voter Integrity Group made some bombshell discoveries.
Last Friday, when the machine reports were being printed at the audit, Todd, who has kept a close watch on Hursti, took pictures of them. Late Thursday, she had the report pictures up on her computer when something earth-shattering caught her eye. She spoke about it Thursday evening in a live video with Nick Moseder, CannCon, Susan Dee Settenbrino, and Professor David Clements.
Marilyn Todd of NH Voter Integrity Group:
Todd, a financial auditor and founder of NH Voter Integrity Group discovered curious listings oin auditor reports including:
Line 30 – Session Start, date 5/12/21
Line 31 – Machine put in “Supervise Mode”
Line 33 – Memory Card Reset
Line 34 – Session Start, date 5/12/21
Line 35 – Prep for Election
Line 36 – Clear Counters
Line 37 – Session Start, date 11/3/20
Line 43 – Session Start, date 11/5/20
But WAIT!, there is more,WATCH THIS, it's a demonstration you should see for yourself: Harry Hursti, Ph.D., has obscured professional relationships with the other two auditors. Hursti exposed the fact in 2005 that the machines that these Diebold memory cards could be easily hacked and manipulated to secretly change vote counts. He also proved that the changed votes would totally undetectable. Hacking Democracy - The Hack: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t75xv...
They also say they saw other curious behavior by the auditors.
The Gateway Pundit reported earlier in the week that two of the three auditors had close ties to Nancy Pelosi and Chuckie Schumer.
So, it appears that the fix was in and we don’t know what they did to the machines but I suspect whatever it was, it covered up something they don’t want someone to find out later.
Harry Hursti, Ph.D., has obscured professional relationships with the other two auditors. Hursti exposed the fact in 2005 that the machines that these Diebold memory cards could be easily hacked and manipulated to secretly change vote counts. He also proved that the changed votes would totally undetectable.
Why does he not mention that fact now?
Populist Press reported this evening:
The forensic audit in Windham, New Hampshire is over, but the momentum to keep it alive is just getting started. Late Thursday, Marilyn Todd of NH Voter Integrity Group made some bombshell discoveries.
Last Friday, when the machine reports were being printed at the audit, Todd, who has kept a close watch on Hursti, took pictures of them. Late Thursday, she had the report pictures up on her computer when something earth-shattering caught her eye. She spoke about it Thursday evening in a live video with Nick Moseder, CannCon, Susan Dee Settenbrino, and Professor David Clements.
Marilyn Todd of NH Voter Integrity Group:
Todd, a financial auditor and founder of NH Voter Integrity Group discovered curious listings oin auditor reports including:
Line 30 – Session Start, date 5/12/21
Line 31 – Machine put in “Supervise Mode”
Line 33 – Memory Card Reset
Line 34 – Session Start, date 5/12/21
Line 35 – Prep for Election
Line 36 – Clear Counters
Line 37 – Session Start, date 11/3/20
Line 43 – Session Start, date 11/5/20
But WAIT!, there is more,WATCH THIS, it's a demonstration you should see for yourself: Harry Hursti, Ph.D., has obscured professional relationships with the other two auditors. Hursti exposed the fact in 2005 that the machines that these Diebold memory cards could be easily hacked and manipulated to secretly change vote counts. He also proved that the changed votes would totally undetectable. Hacking Democracy - The Hack: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t75xv...
And what's with these voting machines? The banks can do all our financial transaction on line with machines and get them right to the penny, billions of dollars a day, yet we can't come up with a machine that can count a few hundred million or so votes correctly. Pure and simple treason, and not addressing it by law will not put a stop to it.
At which point we are confronted with a choice: accept that we live in a fake democracy and always will, or armed revolt.
I am afraid that the public will make the wrong choice. And so far we have.
We the People have to insist that they All Hang for Treason.
Who'da thunk it?
I am beginning to think, you can't build any computer that is Unhackable.
I have no trouble thinking that all the voting machines have been hacked but even still, to me, the video link at the bottom of the post struck me profoundly.
This was how AZ did it for year. They switched to electronic and now rampant cheating.
Realistically, however, you can build several safeguards into the programming to prevent most attempts. Checksums can be invaluable at verifying data inputs and official source code files. Audit trails on everything can expose even back-channel networking communications. Above all, the machines themselves should be locked down and not connected to the Internet at all. Their programming should be audited at least three months before the election and then once the audit comes back satisfactorily, then you timestamp and checksum the build and make sure nothing gets changed until after the election is over.
Nothing can be 100% foolproof when you're dealing with computers. But there were certainly a lot of steps and safeguards which were pointedly ignored by these suspect machines - almost as if they wanted to leave open these back doors....
Psychology warfare all part of the ongoing “Uncivil War”.
Good vs Evil. We are the news!