Earth's Axis Has Been Shifted by Climate Change, Study Says
Excerpt:
“... "The accelerated terrestrial water storage decline resulting from glacial ice melting is thus the main driver of the rapid polar drift toward the east after the 1990s," the study read.
"This new finding indicates that a close relationship existed between polar motion and climate change in the past."...”
BS I sayeth , this is just the way the enviro wacko’s draw attention to their Green New Deal. This is nothing more than twisting and wringing science to fit their narrative...
“... "The accelerated terrestrial water storage decline resulting from glacial ice melting is thus the main driver of the rapid polar drift toward the east after the 1990s," the study read.
"This new finding indicates that a close relationship existed between polar motion and climate change in the past."...”
BS I sayeth , this is just the way the enviro wacko’s draw attention to their Green New Deal. This is nothing more than twisting and wringing science to fit their narrative...
Want to know what really happens in these recurrent cycles?...see: suspicious0bservers.org Disaster series.
I wondered if just hiding on the dark side for a couple of weeks...will still have the electromagnetic effects to mitigate but would be shielded from the impactors. Then sending scout ships to find the least damaged areas to settle for a while till things even out so we could rebuild...should be good to go for 6K years till the next, mostly minor but still devastating move back to our present polar and axis position.
Seriously.
Bonus: then you also don't have to worry about what you find on Earth after that kind of trip. That thin layer of atmosphere Mars has makes a massive amount of difference - literally.
Mars doesn't have all that liquid water to cause trouble though, so maybe you're right.
It's the degradation of the magnetic fields and the suns micronova that does the damage and unlocks the crustal boundary layer that causes Greenland to be at the equator with all of us in tow.
You can imagine all the sloshing around of the oceans during that process. The crust returns on the half cycle 6K years.
There are two planets that don't have one: Mars and Venus. Venus is rather anti-hospitable, Mars is absolutely doable. Even if every planet that has a geomagnetic field flipped at the same time, Mars and Venus can't participate.
The other thing missing from the discussion about it being "imminent" is that it isn't a fast process except on geologic time scales. Around 40-41k years ago Earth had a mild and "sudden" excursion - not a flip just that the poles went walkabout. It took 250 years for the actual polarity (which is FAST) and the magnetic field was about 5% of today's strength during this time. The excursion took place over 440 years, at a time when the field strength was 25% of today's field strength. Excursions happen comparatively frequently.
And actual inversion generally takes thousands of years, ranging from a fast 1,000 year to ten thousand. The last full inversion we know of was during the stone age and took about 22,000 years.
And given that based on what we know the change is driven by the Earth, I'd advise high skepticism of any "all planets will do this together" claims.
But even then ... nothing will happen on Mars while Earth is flipping out. You can't flip a field that doesn't exist. ;)
Once our magnetic shielding weakens 50% the reaction is Fast. The poles and our shields have been moving and weakening since 1860?...not to mention we are now just a bit over the 12,000 year mark. Our fields are 25% down now.
Ben at http://suspicious0bservers.org and other scientist have it pretty laid out from the past to the present.
The other thing we are all forgetting or do not know is that the entire galaxy goes through this change via the galactic current sheet just like earth is affected by the Sun's current sheet.
Here is the entire discussion from the beginning and all the vetting that has taken place since.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...
Unless the mini/micro nova occurs. Then it may be toast, too. That is why my original comment was to head for the orbit of the farthest planet from the sun. Complete speculation though and no funding for that voyage, so I might be here for the events if they occur in the next 50 years.
You'd be much better off reading Von Daniken than trusting any of that bunk from Davidson (the guy behind that site).
To get a sense of him, read his own words:
“It’s like the realization you go through when you realize why your parents told you what they told you about cannabis,” he says. “Imagine that with every aspect of your life. So you have this amazing and fascinating world that’s been hidden right in front of your eyes. And it’s now open to you. It’s more exciting than any plot in a movie or in a book, and it’s real. These things are affecting our lives day-to-day and they might really begin to affect our lives significantly. And then you add on top of that the fact that you begin to realize how much you weren’t told, and how much you may have been lied to. And you have such a rapid shift from normalcy bias and cognitive dissonance into an awakening that you are now open to anything, because your logical filter has sort of been removed.”
So mom and dad lied to him, so he threw logic out of the window.
The guy is a huckster in my view and not worth the time to listen to. He artfully ties together conspiracy various theories people are afraid of, but nothing of value was gained. I many ways it is like the flat-earthers. In order for his claims to be true pretty much the entire scientific world has to be in one truly international grand conspiracy to keep it all secret.
If nothing else, that he claims to be able to explain "all" catastrophes real and imagined should be a flaming red flag.
There is no such thing as a "micro nova" in reputable ascience nd the guy who came up with the idea has been thoroughly and soundly debunked here (Vogt/Diehold Foundation). Davidson's excuse is literally that the CIA set up an agent as a professor to get a student to write a paper to completely eliminate and upend all of history and science on the subject - no reason given of course.
Now field reversal is a real thing and has happened repeatedly. A physical overturn of the world? Nah, I've not seen credible evidence of it. The sheer amount of energy alone that would be required not even the mythical micronova can provide. Especially since we need that energy in the form of physical and/or gravitational mass effects. The Sphinx is not surviving that.
Ancient astronaut theory is far more fun and has orders of magnitude better evidence. ;)
In fact, I believe if you were to use a search engine to look for "micronova theory debunked" or similar, it just might point you to this very website, as we've gone down this road before.
Either way it doesn't matter because I have no resources to expend that could make any difference. None of us will be making a home on Mars or traveling to the vicinity of Pluto, imo.
Interesting experience I had with out Hunter 37...I surfed an 18 footer...standin on my seat at the wheel hollerin: I'm the King of the World!
We road that baby for a good 1/2 mile and dropped gently off the back side and sat still against competing tidal surges for what seemed like forever till we could overtake the current.
That's a ride I'll never forget!