The Hidden Rule of Ownership???
This article/discussion, seems to me to be the same ole cry baby arguments, Property one acquires, whether through competition, hard work, an agreed upon payment, one's choice to bestow upon another/charity, or by Contest-(meaning won by chance) so long as there was no cheating, deception, favoritism (which ever applies) etc is the natural way of things.
Where this argument becomes valid, in my observation, is when there IS Cheating, Deception, Corruption, Coercion or... out right theft.
The premise is age old and the latter arguments is where we end up in the weeds.
They even try to use a biblical argument, which in my view, was more about "are you able to understand the information at the mental stage you are at" similar to how you would teach a child.
But, between you and I, I think, the story is tainted and the message obfuscated.
This whole argument seems to me to be leaning dangerously LEFT of Center...What say you?
Where this argument becomes valid, in my observation, is when there IS Cheating, Deception, Corruption, Coercion or... out right theft.
The premise is age old and the latter arguments is where we end up in the weeds.
They even try to use a biblical argument, which in my view, was more about "are you able to understand the information at the mental stage you are at" similar to how you would teach a child.
But, between you and I, I think, the story is tainted and the message obfuscated.
This whole argument seems to me to be leaning dangerously LEFT of Center...What say you?
Evidence is everywhere.
Ignore that one rule at your peril.
So what am I missing here?...is there anything to their argument?
Redefining the concept of property was spot on.