Thanks, Dobrien. Let me just add Rumble to my Boycott list.

Sorry , Extreme censorship these days from the enemy of the people.
If I see it anywhere else I will Message you.

Rumble apparently took down the video. Links?

It's probably the radio waves they are trying to send to your brain. You need to get a tinfoil hat, I wear mine almost all the time now. Too much brick, not enough tinfoil.

Listened to it yesterday, gained a lot more respect for Lin Wood. There was one student that I'd worry about.

Thanks D. I did get most of it. Sometimes my house seems to block my internet. Too much brick.

Evidence governs my understanding. I have almost zero beliefs.

I make no guarantee that this is legitimate, but the way I came to it causes me to think it just MIGHT be. EDITED TO ADD: I don't know who the questioner is, it isn't Lin. tthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ld3JRxDfJ8&f...

Fair enough but I am not hoping , my reason and logic is guiding me and my beliefs.

You are right on all points. Post away, and I will free free to note when "data" is posted, rather than "information", or when BS is posted.

We agree on more things than we don't. Q as a reliable source, and hoping for a miracle are just not among them.

That is clearly the communist way. They can’t destroy the message so they destroy the messenger.

I believe he was referring to a reported phone conversation Roberts had with Breyer about Scalia’s replacement prior to his death.
Many strange aspects about Scalias death. His claims about Pence is related to emails released about Paul Ryan , Pence and Rod Rosenstein. The emails indicate getting Trump out of the election and Pence becoming President with Rosenstein being VP.

Good point.

Tough beans you chose what to watch not me. When you own this forum ,you can decide what is posted. Till then i’ll Post what I want.

That part near the end where he clearly insinuates that Scalia was murdered (no real surprise there) was startling - especially because he ties in Mike Pence. I'd really love to see that evidence because if so, it would bring down more than just the Democratic Party...

Open mouth, insert foot, swallow to the thigh...

Lin Wood enters the call at 12:40. This is where things get interesting.
He is so calm and well comported during the entire conversation.
It is a joy to witness the bright light of objectivity hitting the unhinged lefty lunatics.

I was surprised she shut up after a while, probably realizing the truth of what he was telling her. I also was surprised how adamant one of the students became actually arguing about how Lin is supposed to react on Twitter for example.

Sorry to hear that, you still having to work. Even if Lin is labeled a quack, what about Sidney Powell and her team? The whole 3/4 of an hour were a good setup and ending. If helped me understand just how these professors are teaching their biased hidden agenda over their chartered subject.

Lin Wood response was fascinating to listen to. My fear that if Biden is able to get his Domestic Terrorist Act though people like Lin Wood and others would be arrested w/o due process since the Democrats are ignoring the Constitution of the Unit States. Biden was actually lying when he took the oath of office about up-holding the Constitution.

He could hit her and the school with defamation charges. While she wasn't speaking publicly she was talking to his/her peers in an academic environment which could negative impact his career. I seriously doubt they give him back his money, about as much as much as I doubt they objective and impartially look at the evidence he offered .
Sad state if this is an indication of whose teaching future lawyers, moreso than usual anyway.

Regressives cannot be "schooled" because they are incapable of learning.

Not everyone here is a staunch Objectivist or Libertarian. Some are Conservatives.

Disparaging the term "Liberal" by associating it with the group colloquially referred to as such, takes strength from our position. It allows them to infer/suggest/assert that it is us that seeks to restrict freedom, when in fact it is them.

Funny you put it it this way.
I remember the Reagan era, where the leftists were saying they were being DENIGRATED with the L-Word. And we gladly labeled them Liberals because of it...

I think that might have been a TRICK used in the process... WOW. How Devious!

I do wish we would stop using the term "Liberal" to describe a clearly non-liberal group of people who have stolen the term.

Unfortunately, Conservatives enabled this to happen with ridiculous non-liberal support for: the moral majority, prohibition, contraception, premarital sex, record labeling, and prudish "Footloose" behavior.

Now we have people actually seeking freedom on both sides, and the left has swung back around to government force on one group in support of the "freedom" or "equality" of another.

Misapplying this positive term for a group that does not represent the positive ideals, is not helping our cause. Not at all! It allows the middle and ignorant to gravitate to the wrong view that we support government force and limits on freedom, and not reality.

In addition, I don't have 45 minutes to listen to something one could read in two minutes. I still work for a living.