NY Times warns readers against critical thinking lest they realize the ‘paper of record’ is feeding them lies

Posted by freedomforall 1 month, 3 weeks ago to Philosophy
2 comments | Share | Flag

"Critical thinking is dangerous, according to a Times editorial urging readers to vet sources with Wikipedia lest they fall into traps set by evil conspiracy theorists and be tricked into questioning the paper’s iron-clad truths.
Charlie Warzel, a Times columnist who styles himself an expert in “online radicalization,” has implored his readers not to “go down the rabbit hole,” in a Thursday op-ed luridly depicting the dangers of evaluating new information, questing out into the internet armed with nothing but one’s own mind. Thinking critically can lead to giving away one’s precious attention to dastardly conspiracy theorists whose only apparent goal is to dupe you, he warns, as opposed to the friendly narrative managers at the New York Times, who just want to make sure your brain is quivering with the required fear quota - of viruses, Russians, your neighbors, terrorists, white people or, now, the capacity for believing wrongthink lurking within your own brain.

It’s logical that the Times should warn its readers against engaging too deeply with “wrongthink,” of course – Times readers often lack a solid grasp of the views they consider to be their deeply-held beliefs, having picked them up absent-mindedly from one ‘approved’ source or another without thinking too deeply about their implications or how they might possibly conflict with their existing values."
SOURCE URL: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/516095-nytimes-critical-thinking-wrongthink-lockstep/

Add Comment


All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ BobCat 1 month, 3 weeks ago
    I didn’t think that the avid Times believers were capable of thinking on their own anyway. Always thought that the Times was telling them how and what to think already, so this is nothing new.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 1 month, 3 weeks ago
    Another example of a good article from RT.
    What did surprise me was the comments, perhaps not great focused thinking tho' general good sense.

    RT comments are often way out extreme views with poor English. Perhaps a new welcome trend is emerging.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  


  • Comment hidden. Undo