Thanks for that article, my summary is that particular brand of vaccine against condition X

1- is not a vaccine
2- does not prevent the patient from getting X but may suppress symptoms
3- is not effective for more than a few months
and
4- the patient can still infect others
5- whether a patient, or anyone, has the condition X is determined by a test which does not work
6- if the patient does not have X the vaccine will cause symptoms of X (but see point 2)
7- for patients who have substance PEG the vaccine may incite allergic reactions

Or have I got it wrong?

What should be remembered is that vaccines artificially contaminate/infect you with the specific illness. They just hope to do it in a way which spurs the body's own defenses to defeat the pathogen without killing the host. A secondary desired effect is to spur the body's immune system to retain a memory of the pathogen so that if re-infection occurs the body can immediately respond.

Your body SHOULD test positive for COVID-19 after getting vaccinated because that pathogen was introduced into your body. The other thing to remember is that at least one of the COVID tests can easily be triggered from viral remnants which can remain in the blood for weeks after the actual infection has been conquered.

The problem that most people who are experiencing side effects from either the vaccine or from the virus itself is known as cytokine storm. I have gone into this in detail in prior threads, but briefly, the proportional response to the disturbance (the pathogen) relative to the integral response (the reset to normalcy) is way out of control. Learn some PID control theory.

Some doctors have reported that the more times you get tested, the more likely to be positive, as the body reacts to the test. Also, why would you not test positive after an RNA vaccine, which gets into your cells permanently, and makes your whole body and organs become one with COVID19. Immune systems stands down. Then, the next version of a covid, maybe a cold, and the immune system ramps up, and attacks it and all forms as one. That is why a mfg. website said to expect deaths a few months after vaccine, but it is not the vaccine. Puzzled, I red viewed the video from the microbiologist in England, and saw the whole picture. They are creating time bombs to go off and kill people, it seems. It was tried on cats, who were given a cat COVID19 virus, they were fine, then they exposed them to anotherversion of covid, they died.

NY is pushing a law that will allow them to put anyone they consider a 'threat to the public' in some sort of detention camp...for Covid of course, but we KNOW they will be able to define that any way they want...https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/20...

My local VA is gearing up to start distributing the vaccine, whichever one they get. I indicated I would take it, but now I'm putting that on hold. I've never seen so much controversial information come out on a vaccine. I never took vaccines before in my life, but around age 65 or so started per doctor recommendations, shingles, pneumonia, tetanus, flu, and who knows what else. Now at 78 with severe COPD I guess I could say I'm scared to take this one. I guess I'll have to flip a coin when my turn comes, there is just way too much opinion in the media anymore about any and everything, and most of it is not even true anymore. I can't wait for the movie to come out, I hope I get to see it.

That counts me out if the mRNA vaccine is coated with propylene glycol, I'm allergic to it. They could be misdiagnosing the symptoms that it is an allergic reaction instead.

In a previous post I stated the complications with Corona virus vaccine in the feline population with Feline Infectious Peritonitis. This vaccine was removed from the market after too many cats experienced devastating immune responses when exposed to the street virus or other Corona viruses. The two current vaccine cause the body to produce produce virus particles which then is supposed to stimulate immunity. The result can be a severe "cytokine storm" similar the natural disease when challenged. This is what happened in cats. I am waiting for the Johnson and Johnson vaccine - whole different technology and appears to be much safer.

Vaccine seems to have worked well. 240 infections are well withing the 95% efficacy rate for the vaccine, though depends upon the number of the million who were exposed to SARS CoV-2 virus. To really find out how the vaccine is working, a large random sample of those being vaccinated should be later purposely exposed to the virus. That would not happen as with the other mRNA vaccine developed last January where the FDA refused to allow a direct test of the vaccine opting for comparing control group to vaccinated cases in the general population giving a 95% efficacy. Could have had the Moderna vaccine perhaps by last June.