Galt's Gulch
12

"Absolute Proof" Video Proving Election Theft (video created by Mike Lindell) - Now Available For Download

Posted by freedomforall 3 years, 2 months ago to Politics
32 comments | Share | Flag

This links to download of a zip file that unzips to an mp4 video file of excellent quality

It is a very convincing argument. Please watch it and share it with your friends and family.
SOURCE URL: https://absoluteproof.blob.core.windows.net/downloads/AbsoluteProofVideo.zip

Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

    -
  • Posted by $ Radio_Randy 3 years, 2 months ago
    If it is so convincing, wouldn't the authorities be doing something about it?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
      -
    • Posted by freedomforall 3 years, 2 months ago
      If you watched it, you would already have the answer. The investigators reported their proof of easy election meddling even before the election and the feds were interested at low investigator levels- those who were technically competent. Then when it reached the level of political appointments the investigation was stonewalled and killed.
      When the Trump team tried to present the data to courts, the judges made excuses not to look at the evidence. Even the Supreme Court of the US refused to even look at the data, making excuses about standing or other "legal" rubbish.
      Justice is not the work of the courts in the United States in the 21st century. The judges only care about power, politics, and pull.
      The authorities are corrupt.
      The authorities deserve to be removed from office, forcibly if necessary, brought to trial for treason, and when found guilty, executed.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        -
      • Posted by Rex_Little 3 years, 2 months ago
        "The authorities deserve to be removed from office, forcibly if necessary, brought to trial for treason, and when found guilty, executed."

        Easy to say, but who shall bell the cat? Not a single judge--even the Trump appointees--would hear his fraud claims, so who's going to find anyone guilty of treason over this?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by freedomforall 3 years, 2 months ago
          We're in a banana republic.
          It's either a revolution or a military coup to enforce the constitution.
          The military in Thailand has done this several times and returned power to the civilian authorities in a short period.
          Are there any patriots in positions of power?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ nickursis 3 years, 2 months ago
      Easy answer Randy, look to Venezuela for the model. And since the software came from there, it was tested when Maduro won 95% of the vote. What did the people do? Some tried to rise up and were killed as "rioters". They had taken their guns away to promote "safety", if there were no guns, no crime, right? They fell for it. Who has done the same thing and keep calling for "gun control"? When you have infiltrated your government with herds of stooges, it is Venezuela all over, or go back to Nazi Germany 1935-39. Who are the Jew now? Trump supporters. Look at the big picture. It IS all a conspiracy, and they have programmed the people with the "conspiracy theorist" moniker to disarm and destroy any attempt to call them out. That is why we are at Waterloo now, unless something changes soon, we are done, because too many people disregarded the "conspiracy theorists".
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    -
  • Posted by Rex_Little 3 years, 2 months ago
    I've watched 28 minutes. Might get around to watching the whole thing at some point. Meanwhile, a question for anyone who has seen it all:

    In the portion I've watched, Lindell makes the case that the voting machines were vulnerable to outside hacking. Later on, does he present hard evidence that they did in fact switch votes in this election? I've been told by the other side that in places where the machine results were compared with manual counts of paper ballots, they matched within an expected margin of human error.

    As for the lists of irregularities he presented, those can't be used to change the results unless you can separate out the particular ballots which were illegally cast. Even if you can prove that, say, 10000 votes were cast in one state by illegal aliens, you can't just subtract 9500 from Biden's total. You know and I know that there were that many, but that's not hard evidence.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    -
  • Posted by CTYankee44 3 years, 2 months ago
    Let me be candid. Long diatribes like this tend to be unwatchable. I'm 18 minutes in and I'm yawning because the talking heads fail to provide 'interesting' content. They might as well be trying to sell me a "MLM business opportunity".
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Dobrien 3 years, 2 months ago
      Wow 2hrs to.see how the United States of America was defeated by Chinazi’s is too much for you? No wonder we have been destroyed from within. Within a couple of years you will be waiting that long to get a 🥖 bread.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      -
    • Posted by freedomforall 3 years, 2 months ago
      Seriously, courtroom actions are rarely entertaining and are often technically confusing.
      You are right that if the intent is to convince a jury of peers, the summation would have to be much more to the point and simplified.
      However, if that was done in this video the media would be correct in saying: no evidence.
      Yes, it could be improved but the evidence is there and connected for all to see.

      Atlas Shrugged the movie wasn't as well done as it could have been compared to the book, and for those who read the book a lot was lost in the translation.

      What would you do specifically to make Absolute Proof better? Is it worth your time?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by CTYankee44 3 years, 2 months ago
        Idunno. I gave up at about the 18 minute mark. If I could have watched it at 1.5X speed (like everything else I watch), then I might have been able to tolerate it.

        I already know that 'the steal was in'. Just look at my threads in Quora.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo