A small case but a positive ruling - Galt's Gulch

Remove this ad.

12

A small case but a positive ruling

Posted by blarman 3 years, 1 month ago to Government

9 comments | Share | Flag

Hopefully this is part of a snowball rolling down a snowy slope.

SOURCE URL: https://libertyonenews.com/massive-fraud-absentee-ballot-corruption-causes-judge-to-rule-for-election-do-over/

Add Comment

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

4

Posted by Thoritsu 3 years, 1 month ago

Epoch Times ran this, and noted she was facing felony charges.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/judge-o...

Excellent!

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink
- 1
  
  Posted by blarman 3 years, 1 month ago
  
  You mean the elections official? Yes! That's why this ruling - despite it being local - was a bellweather. Democrats claimed that it was the most transparent and fraud-free election - which we all know to be a whopper of a lie. This is evidence that even local races were affected.
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
  - 3
    
    Posted by Thoritsu 3 years, 1 month ago
    
    I'd love to get Roberts in a corner and force him to explain why he refused to do his job.
    
    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
    - 2
      
      Posted by blarman 3 years, 1 month ago
      
      I'd love to stand there with you. My guess is that it has something to do with his participation on Orgy Island...
      
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
      - 1
        
        Posted by Thoritsu 3 years, 1 month ago
        
        Could be, or the pictures they took of him in conjugal bliss with a goat.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink

4

Posted by 25n56il4 3 years, 1 month ago

A glimmer of hope!

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink

2

Posted by NealS 3 years, 1 month ago

The lower courts need to make the proper rulings on these cases since the SCOTUS does not seem to understand the significance of the people not having confidence in the results. Might it be the SCOTUS was really just telling us we need to fix it at the State level? After all, it's supposed to be what the people want, not just what the government thinks the people want.

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink

2

Posted by AJAshinoff 3 years, 1 month ago

For some reason I don't think precident means very much anymore.

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink

2

Posted by Dobrien 3 years, 1 month ago

Thanks Blair, There is a honest Judge somewhere.

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink

Comment hidden.