Pennsylvania Secretary Of State Overseeing Election Is Never-Trumper and Declared Trump ‘Dangerously Unfit’ For Office, ‘Demeaning’ To Presidency. Who Is Unfit For Office?
Posted by freedomforall 3 years, 5 months ago to Politics
"Boockvar, who previously served as senior election modernization adviser to the critical swing state’s Governor, now heads Pennsylvania’s Department of State. The department is “responsible for monitoring all aspects of an election, from ballot access to voting provisions” – of paramount importance in light of Pennsylvania’s integral and contested status as of November 4th.
Boockvar, however, can hardly be seen as a neutral arbiter.
On March 7th, 2017, Boockvar tweeted that “Using the title ‘President’ before the word ‘Trump’ really demeans the office of the presidency…”
Using the title 'President' before the word 'Trump' really demeans the office of the presidency…
— Kathy Boockvar (@KathyBoockvar) March 7, 2017
What’s more, she described President Trump “beyond doubt” to be ” dangerously unfit” for office:
Trump already provided so many arguments of being dangerously unfit; Now, he proved it beyond doubt @ByJohnLMicek https://t.co/nOBf7NMCBi
— Kathy Boockvar (@KathyBoockvar) August 11, 2016
She’s also shared the pro-Clinton hashtag “We’reWithHer” in 2016 while sharing a quote of an individual attacking President Trump:
"This election is not just about Donald Trump's judgment;it's about our own" Kristen Kavanaugh, Marine Corps Veteran @kriskav #we'rewithher
— Kathy Boockvar (@KathyBoockvar) July 28, 2016
Similarly, she attacked President Trump’s character as “damnable”:
Something about the contrast between what Yom Kippur is about and Trump's threats to sue the victims felt particularly damnable even for him https://t.co/MbYWfCJaBk
— Kathy Boockvar (@KathyBoockvar) October 13, 2016"
Boockvar, however, can hardly be seen as a neutral arbiter.
On March 7th, 2017, Boockvar tweeted that “Using the title ‘President’ before the word ‘Trump’ really demeans the office of the presidency…”
Using the title 'President' before the word 'Trump' really demeans the office of the presidency…
— Kathy Boockvar (@KathyBoockvar) March 7, 2017
What’s more, she described President Trump “beyond doubt” to be ” dangerously unfit” for office:
Trump already provided so many arguments of being dangerously unfit; Now, he proved it beyond doubt @ByJohnLMicek https://t.co/nOBf7NMCBi
— Kathy Boockvar (@KathyBoockvar) August 11, 2016
She’s also shared the pro-Clinton hashtag “We’reWithHer” in 2016 while sharing a quote of an individual attacking President Trump:
"This election is not just about Donald Trump's judgment;it's about our own" Kristen Kavanaugh, Marine Corps Veteran @kriskav #we'rewithher
— Kathy Boockvar (@KathyBoockvar) July 28, 2016
Similarly, she attacked President Trump’s character as “damnable”:
Something about the contrast between what Yom Kippur is about and Trump's threats to sue the victims felt particularly damnable even for him https://t.co/MbYWfCJaBk
— Kathy Boockvar (@KathyBoockvar) October 13, 2016"
Me dino can just see it now. When Buy-den is kissing up to China despite what amounts to a germ warfare attack, Quid Pro Quo Joe will (besides getting--shush now--another 10% cut of Hunter's action) he will smile and call anyone who criticizes him a lying dog-faced pony soldier.
I hate to see her with her finger on the nuclear button.
Boockvar also needs to be questioned on how Pennsylvania monitors for fraud and how they hold fraudsters accountable. Prosecutors need to find out if she has accepted potential bribes or collaborated with politically-motivated mobs or special interests. She could be prone to comply with the demands of rioters, who use threats of violence to get what they want out of elected officials. Rioters and looters have been very active in Pennsylvania recently.
Pennsylvania, like many states, is under duress from criminal rioters who want Trump removed from office. What power do these rioters have over elected officials and those who oversee the election process? Democratic mayors have turned a blind eye to the riots in 2020, calling off law enforcement and riot control. How much more might they turn a blind eye to regarding election misconduct, allowing these gangs to take over the process and get what they want?"
It's even difficult to design a system without some risk of defeat via conspiracy.
Few would be able to resist if their loved ones are threatened by someone with power. They would still be guilty of being corrupted.
If we want laws of any kind kept, at least some of the time we have to enforce them ourselves, even if we have professionals who are supposed to be doing it.
And citizen force to enforce fair elections is not even unprecedented in the US. If you're unfamiliar with the Battle of Athens (TN, 1946), look it up on Youtube.