11

National Election Fraud: Evidence of National Chicanery During America’s 2020 Presidential Election

Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 7 months ago to Politics
44 comments | Share | Flag

Great summaries of Election Fraud 2020

The General Landscape of American Election Fraud
The media is trying to weave a narrative with ever-shifting goalposts. They began by saying that not only did voter fraud not happen, but that it’s impossible. Now, they have shifted their story to saying that there is always minor fraud, but that it never really matters much.

The Heritage Foundation has identified 1,200 elections where voter fraud made the difference in recent decades long after the era of Jim Crow when election theft was de rigueur. Of these, fully 15 were thrown out specifically because of cheating by mail-in ballot.

Mail-in ballots are largely banned in Europe, where voter ID requirements are likewise the norm. Florida has been recognized specifically as an offender.

Another narrative in the controlled media is that illegal aliens and other non-citizens don’t vote. This is patently untrue. In fact, they vote at alarmingly high rates. A 2019 study found that approximately 2.2 percent of respondents admitted to voting illegally, which implies a little under a million ballots cast by non-citizens every year.

The counterargument is that respondents are either lying or misunderstood the question, but this is simply not true — those who conducted the study verified their votes.

So we can see that electoral fraud is not only impossible, it is common. It is not negligible, it has determined elections in living memory. With this as our backdrop, we will now investigate voter irregularities throughout the nation during the 2020 Presidential election.

What Constitutes Evidence of Electoral Fraud?
Before going further, it is worth discussing what constitutes evidence for electoral fraud. Well, the Carter Center has a set of standards that they use to determine whether or not there has been electoral fraud somewhere.

These are the standards used by globalists to determine whether or not elections they disapprove of have been conducted fraudulently. Several of them are present in the contested states:

Counting procedures should be verifiable.
Votes should be presented for independent review.
Elections should be subject to recounts.
Additionally, the Carter Center states that it is the right of dissidents to challenge and question the results of an election that they believe to be fraudulent. Harassing dissidents is considered evidence of chicanery in and of itself.

“Effective redress” is the term they use and it is considered by the Carter Center to be vital for establishing an election as legitimate. The resistance of the Democratic Party to recounts and audits should be a red flag in and of itself.

There are also mathematical anomalies that are worth looking into because, regardless of turnout and outcome, elections will follow certain patterns. One of these is that, because of mail sorting, mail-in ballots will consistently show the same ratio of support for each candidate. We did not see that, however — there is a significant spike in support for Biden and fall off in support for President Trump as Election Night dragged on.

Indeed, in Wisconsin, this anomaly became massive around 4 a.m., the same time that the massive ballot drops without supervision began. The same phenomenon occurred in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Georgia, all four of these states with copious amounts of electoral chicanery and irregularity. Virginia was another state with similar mathematical irregularities.

Benford’s Law is another area where we see mathematical irregularities. Put simply: When we have large datasets of numbers, there is a pattern we can find with regard to the final and penultimate digit of each number in this data set.

Benford’s Law analysis is one of the first things run by forensic accountants looking for financial malfeasance or tax cheating.

Many of the electoral tallies in disputed states violate Benford’s Law — but only for Joe Biden, whose distribution more closely resembles the curve when people type “random” numbers in. President Trump, Jo Jorgensen, Howie Hawkins, and Kanye West’s numbers do not violate this law, but former Vice President Biden’s do in disputed areas.

The Wikipedia article about Benford’s Law was altered and locked after several enterprising Twitter users began investigating this strand of the 2020 election theft.
The Glitch From Coast to Coast
One recurring theme throughout the 2020 election is the glitch. There have been a number of glitches, many detailed in our series on irregularities in different states. This, in and of itself might not be cause for concern — however, in every case, these so-called “software glitches” favor former Vice President Biden at the expense of President Donald Trump.

Again, we have detailed these in our state series article, but we will mention some here just to give you a general idea of what has been going on with these “glitches.”

One in Michigan sent 6,000 votes to Biden that were meant for Donald Trump. Another in Wisconsin, robbed Donald Trump of 19,500 votes. Another similar glitch in Georgia saw an unspecified number of votes go to Biden that were, once again, meant for the President.

There appears to be a pattern here. Were these all bona fide mistakes, we would likely find votes that were meant to go for Joe Biden going to Donald Trump before the situation was corrected. But we are unaware of any such error in favor of the President.

The common denominator? The voting software used to calculate the vote made by a company with deep connections to the DNC.
The Turnout That Wasn’t
The DNC’s victory in the 2020 Presidential election relies heavily upon a massively increased turnout, again centered around a handful of large cities controlled by the Democratic Party. One example of this is 90 percent turnout in the entire State of Wisconsin, which would not only be the highest level of turnout in American history, but also comes close to the 92 percent average in Australia where voting is mandatory. In the city of Milwaukee alone, the turnout was 84 percent.

Compare this turnout to Cleveland, a culturally comparable city not in a swing state, which had a comparatively scant 51 percent turnout. This is an important city to draw a contrast with because, while it is a Democratic stronghold, as are most large cities, and it has a similar minority population, it was not in a state that was considered in play this election. Democrats attempted to steal the election by fabricating astronomical turnout in urban areas they control in swing states.

The turnout gambit becomes even more laughable when one considers that Biden is one of the least invigorating Democratic candidates since John Kerry or Mike Dukakis. Yet somehow this candidate was able to increase his vote above what Barack Obama enjoyed, with some districts in Milwaukee putting up more votes than there are registered voters in the area.

A broad study conducted by Judicial Watch found that 353 counties across 29 states had turnout exceeding 100 percent of registered voters. Eight of these had turnout exceeding 100 percent across the entire state: Alaska, Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

Perhaps more damning, the study was limited to 37 states publishing their voter registration data. This means that, of the 37 states that Judicial Watch had access to, 78 percent of them had turnout exceeding 100 percent.

Continue to read the article linked in the title.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by term2 4 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    and then there is Nevada. No checking for signatures on mail in ballots at all. No ID required of any kind. I think this sort of thing makes people (like me) not trust that the election results are correct and that I should trust them. As a result of THIS election and whats come up, I dont trust the election at all and think that it should be repeated without the mail in ballots, or I will not accept it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by minesayn 4 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I work part-time for the local board of elections in my county (in Ohio), and have done so since the 2016 election. All ballot envelopes and other election-related mail is kept for a minimum of 90 days, and the ballots themselves for even longer (3 years, I believe it is). They are NOT tossed away. Everything like the ballot request form, the ballot envelope is checked and double checked for accuracy by bipartisan staff. If there is any doubt with ID information, signature, the voter is sent extra verification requests. Signature doesn't match or ID information is incorrect, it is set aside until verification from the voter is obtained. I cannot speak for other states, but I can only speak for what Ohio does in regards to elections. Our elections are run by the Secretary of State's office, and he is a Republican. We have bipartisan staff (half Republican, half Democrat), and even the part-time employees are hired based on bipartisanship. There is never a time when there is only one party in the office.

    I will say that during in-person voting, the biggest mistake that caused a voter to have to spoil their ballot (and get a new ballot) was to cast votes for two presidential candidates. Not only would a voter vote for one of the major party candidates, but then write in the candidates' names. With our voting machines, it would flag that race as an over-vote, and then the voter could choose to get another ballot or cast it as is. Almost everyone chose to get another ballot, after spoiling the first. This happened frequently to both parties, both those who voted for Trump and those who voted for Biden. I have to say that those who got an absentee ballot mailed to them could have done the same thing, but wouldn't have been caught like the in-person voters.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 4 years, 7 months ago
    Ironically, the Dominion software handbook tells the user that it is possible for the software to make a mistake in logic and misfile ballot counts when the input is large, and that the recommended solution is to invalidate the election and call for a new round of voting with more controlled rate of input.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 4 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I can only give AR tremendous credit for seeing how all this goes. She thought, incorrectly though, that enough people would understand her novel sufficiently to prevent it from becoming a documentary.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 4 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree, term. I had given up on voting after '88 until 2016. If the media driven unfair election of Buy-dem stands I will only vote with my (greatly reduced) purchases and my feet.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 4 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think the scenario in AS is pretty much right on. We hav to just stop feeding the crooked state. This might mean hiding in a galts gulch either in this country or another. Fighting the leftists is to much work, and is pretty much destined to just waste out time while we are alive. Trump was the last straw to keep our country free of absolute leftist control. No one else is going to be strong enough to battle the left like he did.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 4 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think that to keep this election as the valid one makes the whole process permanently crooked. I probably wont even vote in the future because my vote isnt taken seriously. The leftists might as well just install anyone they want, as I have given up thinking of the USA as the bastion of freedom. I am ready for a civil war. Lets get it over with.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 4 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree that there isn't any way that this election can be counted fairly. I don't see any law that can force a new one on states that are controlled by the left.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 4 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Good question. I don't see that as a realistic possibility, and I don't know how it would be implemented under the Constitution's limited government.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Rex_Little 4 years, 7 months ago
    Meanwhile, whenever a TV reporter--reporter, not commentator!--mentions Trump's fraud claims, she labels them "false", as if it was a proven fact.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 4 years, 7 months ago
    Just a note, but having turnout exceeding registered voters is usually the result of a population which prefers to vote in the General Elections but not the Primaries - it's not necessarily an automatic red flag. It should be compared against the number of voting-age citizens for a better comparison. (Typical numbers show only 2/3 participation in voluntary elections.) We should be very suspicious if the number of votes cast exceeds 90% of the eligible citizens.

    Another major factor which can lead to this is the ease of voting using same-day registration - which can be problematic depending on the precautionary measures taken.

    In my perfect world all voting would be done in person at the polls showing valid ID. One could apply for a waiver and vote via mail-in ballot only if someone will validate the need (such as getting doctor's note or hospice OK) and will certify both the application for the mail-in ballot AND the ballot itself. This certification would be similar to the process used by a notary public where the witness is legally liable for certifying false information.

    Also, any vote tabulation systems must be 100% owned and operated in the United States of America. No exceptions. All automated systems must be certified and audited PRIOR to the elections by at least two independent auditors selected by two different political parties. Once the devices have been certified, there are no changes allowed to the devices until after the elections have been certified.

    Ideally, every tabulation system would generate a voting receipt the voter can use to verify their vote was tabulated correctly (along with a formal process for disputation).


    All vote tabulation results are the responsibility of the respective Secretaries of State of each respective State pursuant to State legislative dictates. Now regarding the tabulation and reporting itself, I'd like to see the following procedural changes/clarifications applied across all the 50 States for National elections, ie elections of State representatives to the United States Senate or United States House of Representatives or President/Vice-President of the United States:

    1) The respective Secretaries of State shall give regular and uniform updates (every hour) to each respective candidate regarding the progress of the vote counting and intermediary results with all candidates receiving the same information at the same time. Only a Secretary of State acting in one's official capacity may report polling or other voting information (eliminate exit polling) and States are free to dictate the content of the information disseminated and whether or not the same information reported to the candidates is also to be made available to the Press. When the Secretary of State certifies the results, they also declare the winners. (The media is not allowed to "call" an election in favor of one candidate or another.)

    2) Challenges to results should be lodged with the Secretary of State by the individual candidates and all such challenges must be resolved before a certification may be issued. Legal restrictions as to timing, content, etc. shall be set forth by State Legislatures and adjudicated first in State courts with appellate authority going directly to the Supreme Court of the United States.

    3) Whereas the Electoral College has the Constitutional responsibility to elect the President of the United States, only the actual vote of the Electoral College shall be considered authoritative in respect to electing the President of the United States. (This is the single exception to the certification of results above.) With respect to the election of the President and Vice President of the United States, certification by the Secretary of State should be a formal report to their respective State Legislature who then appoints Electoral College voters in accordance with State laws regarding such selection and in accordance with certified election results.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 4 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I dont think this election cant be salvaged. We need a NEW election without the mail in votes, and requiring ID in person.

    The mail in ballots, once the signed envelopes are tossed , cant be checked for validity anymore.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 4 years, 7 months ago
    Is there any way to declare the current election simply invalid, and schedule a NEW one without mail in ballots?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 4 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Me dino wonders if officials of X-number other states approved of those machines for knowing they were rigged. It would not surprise me at all.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 4 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I am one of those that made such remarks regarding Venezuela. I've also said of the people in Portland and Seattle, including the police unions, donated to and voted for what they got.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 4 years, 7 months ago
    Venezuela- We, that is many including me, have thought and said-
    Tough on those Venezuelans, but they voted for it, now they have got it.

    Now, all is known, they did not vote for it!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 4 years, 7 months ago
    I think this election is so screwed up we should go back and do it over and count our on votes instead of letting them be counted in Germany via Spain. Why are we using voting machines made in another country? I don't think Texas used these machines.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 4 years, 7 months ago
    Fight Back to Save America

    Don’t let any of this get you down, because the fight is far from over. Both President Trump and Congressional Republicans are working hard, both in the public sphere and in the courts to make sure that the 2020 election is fair and transparent.

    So what can you do to join in the fight?

    First, you should call your elected representatives. That means calling your state rep, your state senator, your House Rep and your U.S. Senator. You should do this be they friend or foe — either way, they need to know that you insist on having all legal votes counted. Insist on concrete steps to ensure the integrity of the vote. Do not settle for stock answers about the importance of democracy. A Twitter account has made what is actually a very good script for you to follow when you call in. Be firm, but polite. https://twitter.com/VaultTrump/status...

    If you want to take to the streets, there are opportunities. Stop The Steal https://stopthesteal.us/ is the movement dedicated to putting bodies in the streets of our nation’s state capitals to let our elected officials know that we are not going to stand for seeing our elections stolen in a manner befitting Zimbabwe. There are almost daily rallies at the state capitol building and the TFC Center in Detroit. What’s more, a nationwide rally in DC called the Million MAGA March is scheduled for November 14. The Democratic government of Washington, DC has responded with new COVID restrictions designed to cripple the march.

    What can you do? Quite a lot. Nothing less than the future of the country is at stake. If they can steal this election, don’t expect another one to be free and fair. But do expect a lot of gun grabs and speech laws.

    The link for the entire excellent article is:
    https://blog.libertasbella.com/united...
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo