Watermarks and the Sting

Posted by $ Dobrien 2 years, 6 months ago to Government
37 comments | Share | Flag

I don’t like infowars , but this interviewed patriot
claims he got the OK to release this info from the Sting coordinators. Steve Pieczenick gives a reasonable explanation for Trumps action to counter this “Color Revolution”
Q stated frequently that we have the playbook.
Then you can trap the vermin. If this is not true than we have to rely on unreliable Judges.
There are many reasons this information war is happening mainly years of brainwashing , a very real deep satanic state Seeking evil agendas and a corrupt deceitful traitorous media. The people have to see for their own eyes what is happening to our country and who is doing it. RINOs like Flake , Rotteney, Chubby Christie , Rubio , and many more showing the blue feathers that they like shoved up their asses.
If Trump didn’t have safe election measures put into place it would have been neglecting the know plan to cheat anyway The could.
SOURCE URL: https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/democrats-were-set-up-in-sting-operation-to-catch-them-stealing-election/

Add Comment


All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 2 years, 6 months ago
    I found it and am listening to it right now before I saw your post...you beat me to it, touche, Brother.

    If this is true, it is truly brilliant! and sick stomach will begin to subside.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 2 years, 6 months ago
      If Trump didn’t foresee that these cheating lying slime would commit fraud and put counter measures in place, I’ll be a son of a bitch.
      Moves /counter moves,
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by dave42 2 years, 6 months ago
    I have some serious doubts on both the watermarking and GPS reports:

    On Watermarking: Ballots are produced at the state or city/town level and are unique at least to the state legislative district. Some cities or towns can have their own ballot initiative questions or offices standing for election. Adding watermarking / serialization would involve the cooperation of a huge number of private printing companies.

    On GPS: GPS is a send-only technology. The satellites send a very accurate time and location signal, the GPS receiver receives these signals from at least 4 satellites and does a very complex geometry calculation (including accounting for the speed of light) to determine its location. After all that, the receiver knows where it is (and doesn't have to tell anyone). There's no way you could incorporate a GPS receiver into a ballot, never mind a separate communications system to report the location to an outside receiver.

    I'm not sure of the law (and it will vary state-by-state) but are informal ballots (don't use the official form, but make your choice plainly known) valid?

    Here's the verification that can be done without using any of the above:

    Get a list of those registered to vote.
    - Check that list for people who died (either recently or in the distant past)
    - Check that list for people who registered elsewhere when they moved.
    - Check for the number of people registered at an address versus the reasonable living capacity at that address.
    (don't immediately disqualify -- go check it out)
    Get the number of people who voted (names checked off as voted on the election register).
    - in person on Election Day
    - by early voting at the town hall.
    - by mail-in ballot / absentee voting.
    Get the number of ballots cast
    - in person on Election Day
    - by early voting at the town hall.
    - by mail-in ballot / absentee voting.
    Signature check for mail-in ballots -- doesn't need to match exactly but should be 'close enough' or not an obvious non-match.
    Voters should equal votes (a SMALL discrepency can be allowed due to human imperfection) for each class.
    Ensure that people who try to vote both in person and mail-in are handled reasonably
    (either disallow in-person voting or throw away the mail-in ballot)
    (throw away mail-in ballot is preferred as it can override a fraudulent mail-in ballot, just tell voter about it)

    Number of voters must be less than (or the extremely unlikely equal to) the number registered.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 2 years, 6 months ago
      A tangible explanation of this is provided by Jay Dee:

      “The paper was created, ordered and supplied by the GOVT/DHS in bulk for the 2020 Federal elections due to COVID. This was only for “mail in ballots” as that is where the fraud would occur.

      Printing is done state by state.

      So whoever prints it, “gets it”…

      Arizona, Pennsylvania, Michigan, etc.. (Washington?) sent them out, then destroyed the ones for Trump and printed new ones for Biden.The NEW ONES for Biden don’t have the watermark but they have counted them as authentic. A “watertight” case… Brilliant.

      This is legit, and they have been telling us about it for over a year. Most recently just 10 days ago. DHS has been in charge of our elections since early 2018.”

      Watermark & indicators in ballot paper:

      So, while every state printed their own ballots, the paper each state used was supplied by the DHS and contains the QFS Blockchain Encryption Code.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 2 years, 6 months ago
    Voting result- do not believe as currently reported.
    Voting patterns- impossible.
    Fraud- Yes and big.
    Steve P-crackpot.

    Sting using high tech blockchain watermarks and GPS - why bother when it could be used to stop fraud as it occurs?

    Yes, I am a skeptic, sounds to me as another Q type story- I would scream with delirious delight if it happens that way.

    Have any of these predictions actually happened?
    Have those predictions been useful in any way?
    Could it be some big noting fiction writer?
    Or, worse than that, some malicious intent?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 2 years, 6 months ago
      “Have any of these predictions actually happened”? How about this post

      Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 338ebd No.10668955 📁
      Sep 16 2020 12:16:59 (EST)
      Add it all up.
      1. Virus
      2. Riots [organized _ANTIFA]
      3. Fires
      The 'Why
      Make no mistake, they will not concede on Election Night.
      Make no mistake, they will contest this legally in battleground states.
      Make no mistake, they will project doubt in the election results
      Make no mistake, they will organize massive riots and attempt Anarchy-99 design
      Playbook known.

      Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 0836cc No.4280331 📁
      Dec 12 2018 18:45:22 (EST)
      Anonymous ID: 13013e No.4280236 📁
      Dec 12 2018 18:43:40 (EST)

      Will voter fraud be exposed before January?
      2019 push Voter ID based on verifiable intel (fraud).
      2020+ safeguarded.

      1-Election + D party officials filled out many thousands of blank ballots?
      2-Election + D party officials removed and destroyed 'legal' ballots?
      3-Election + D party officials deliberately organized non-citizen voting?
      4-Election + D party officials in [XX] locations across the US [under lock & key] stored many thousands of 'blank' ballots for purposes of 'altering the vote total'?
      Who safeguards 'blank' ballots?
      Who issues 'blank' ballots?
      Who controls 'blank' ballots?
      How many 'blank' ballots are generated vs. total county pop?
      Why did the same counties [under dispute today] REFUSE to turn over voter registration information upon request to the Voter Fraud Commission?
      Why was the Voter Fraud Commission disbanded and turned over to DHS?
      What vested auth does DHS have compared to a commission body?
      Enemy @ the Front Door.

      Crackpot? Pieczenik was Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance and James Baker.[2] He served the presidential administrations of Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush in the capacity of deputy assistant secretary.[7]

      In 1974, Pieczenik joined the United States Department of State as a consultant to help in the restructuring of its Office for the Prevention of Terrorism.[1] In 1976, Pieczenik was made Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for management.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Lucky 2 years, 6 months ago
        OK, some of the predictions have happened. Thanks for the work.

        Virus- deliberate release? Planned by dems?
        Riots- yes, but a net benefit in votes for Trump.
        Fires- as per blm- yes. Was that a benefit for them? California, easy prediction considering the (in)action of park management.
        So, yes some hits, not meaningful to me anyway.

        From experience of a skeptic group, to evaluate effectiveness of a psychic or a horse racing advisor, you must list every prediction, not just the ones that come out.
        (How about a certain person goes to jail, shot at dawn, even to have charges brought would be sweet)

        SteveP- that list is the sort of thing that would be on his web site if there is one. To evaluate there are two main questions-
        1. are the claims valid?
        2. very important, what is not on the website?
        High IQ, education, high competence, compare Fauci. (#1)

        There is stuff not on that list, that person is deranged, good fun, but do not trust.

        This blockchain sting story, if it is true, when will it come out? When would the testing or test results go to court?

        Consider a counter conspiracy- Q exists, but is a group of Dems. They speak to us, they know what we want, how we think, we wait for the deus ex machina - an event which will blow the Dem scam right out. We wait patiently in faith refraining from any action (#2) that could be effective as the big scam will be exposed and destroyed in one great scoop/blow. But, it does not come.
        All this is not evidence. Yes, you have heard what you want to hear. Believe it, ok, but if you rely on it, you will end up a mess.

        What about Hammer & scorecard? Quite likely. but how to prove it was used, and that the use broke a specific law? Could Trump order those involved to testify - then pardon?

        #1 See the quotes from Fauci about the PCR test.. off topic but informative.
        if more than 35 cycles not a valid diagnostic tool.

        #2 Bringing charges with available evidence of state/fed laws broken.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 2 years, 6 months ago
          Here is another person Dr Charlie Ward repeating the same claim.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by Lucky 2 years, 6 months ago
            Dr Charlie Ward: has a low profile on the net, but I did not find any horrors. Nothing on wiki which would be sure to have the usual on that kind of thinker, I did not resort to ggl.

            He says: We now have hard evidence.
            I say, great! But what, where, when?

            A comment on the vid site says:
            I know it's too perfect. I want to believe it but this process [is] going to be much more drawn out. This may be a distraction for when actual evidence is released they can conflate the issue with this one and discredit the entire idea

            This site looks interesting but I did not follow the links,
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by $ 2 years, 6 months ago
              What where when? That is only going to be revealed when it doesn’t tip off the targeted criminals. The people I follow are fighting against the whole diseased corrupt temple. I want it to be brought down on their heads. No one has fought for my liberties more than Trump . Q is close to Trump and he is helping by pass the media and get the real facts about issues to the people.
              Q is widely followed , by the enemy as well as the anons it is a precision military psyop. It serves multiple purposes. Q has posted drops to manipulate the guilty to expose their complicity.
              The media has written many thousands of false and negative articles about Q and those enlightened by the research associated with the open source data that is provided or led to. That should tell you something by itself.
              I happen to think Trump has caught them in many different schemes . Hammer and Scorecard doesn’t look good for them.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by Lucky 2 years, 6 months ago
                Yes, Hammer&Scorecard- observation of patterns, statistical analysis, give the game away. That may not be evidence for a court to convict directly, but it tells an investigator where to look for evidence, even an un-explainable jump/drop in the count should be enough to say- fakery exits here.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 2 years, 6 months ago
    This is confirmed in several ways. The Trump HS and DOEE got a paptent approved last year for a proprietary blockchain solution for ballots that is the watermark thing. I am not sure how it works, but they say it was deployed this year. If a ballot does not have it, it is fake. They have evidence of where the fake ballots were printed (not here), and the only way to get the people who refuse to open their minds and think for themselves to see is to make the fraud so blatant and clear, it cannot be denied.
    Fakebook is censoring heavily, links to web sites they deem "dangerous" are blocked ("You cannot post this link on Fakebook" message). Now, for a for profit company, who makes money on eyes on ads, why would they delete a 1.5 million member group?
    Why was Arizona called so early?
    Why did a Wisconsin elections offical take home thousands of ballots for 1.5 days and be "unreachable"?
    The answer will be Voter ID, one person, one vote.
    We will see how well the Plan works over the next few weeks.

    Go watch Dave at X22Report.com and listen to his reports, he makes it very clear and easy to understand, and ha the data to back up his logic.

    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 25n56il4 2 years, 6 months ago
      At first I was terribly depressed. Then I said, 'OK let's see what is ahead for the next 4 years.' Biden and Harris cannot deliver on their promises. It should be interesting. N
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ nickursis 2 years, 6 months ago
        I am in the camp of there will be no Biden and Harris. There are few, if any "official" results. It is a media programming effort to fix in the minds of the people that they did win, so any challenge is false. Information warfare.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  


  • Comment hidden. Undo