10

New York Times Publishes Treasonous Op/Ed Calling for United Nations Takeover of United States

Posted by freedomforall 1 week, 2 days ago to Politics
24 comments | Share | Flag

"A recent New York Times op/ed has argued that “America may need international intervention” from the United Nations to effectively end U.S. sovereignty.
(See that op-ed here: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/06/op... )
Opinion contributor Peter Beinart made the argument to give away the U.S. to foreign powers – exactly what the fake news hacks at the Times and other left-wing propaganda rags have argued for years that President Trump was trying to do with Russia."
SOURCE URL: https://bigleaguepolitics.com/new-york-times-publishes-treasonous-op-ed-calling-for-united-nations-takeover-of-united-states/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ Stormi 1 week, 1 day ago
    A world gov with the UN at the head is not a new idea, nor a good one. In a now out of print book, "The Rockefeller Files", Kissinger said if we could get contorl of oil, good and banks, we could have one world gov by 1976. Obama helped it along with his meetings with Kissiner and Soros in the Oval Office. Then he transferred control of the independent Internet to the UN, who put Chinese in charge of it. No one seembed to blink and eye, which infuriated me. The UN in Agenda 21(aka: Green New Deal after plagiarized by AOC), calls for end of capitalism, end of property rights by any but world gov., end of cars, red meat consumption, pregnancy by license by world orad only, no guns. To this Pelsi has called for getting rid of subdivisions and putting everyone in urband high rises. We avoided UN control for years, then the left has stepped up the game with poorly educated new voters who are taught the gov will provide and to care nothing about our USA, which our military fought to keep free. Now they want cops gone, who protect our safety and freedoms daily. Obama is not the brightest, but he is the most corrupt we have seen in years, and backed by Soros, intent on destroying the USA.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by NealS 1 week, 1 day ago
    I'm ready if they need me or can just use me. I checked my closets and only found my old dress greens. The jacket doesn't fit, it must have shrunk hanging in there all these years, so I doubt the pants will fit either. All my jungle fatigues are gone and so are my jungle boots. I think I still have a pair of spit shined jump boots. I won't have to be drafted, just ask me, I'm almost ready to fight again.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by KevinSchwinkendorf 1 week, 1 day ago
    As far as I'm concerned, I (we) still have thousands of nuclear weapons standing between us and foreign powers invading our country. UN "Peacekeepers" with blue helmets are also known as "targets" - remember the saying, "There will be a rifleman behind every blade of grass!" There is nothing wrong with killing an invader.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 1 week, 1 day ago
      So who controls those weapons when Democrats invite the Un troops to oust a president from his bunker? What president would use them when American civilians are used as cover by the foreign troops?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by KevinSchwinkendorf 1 week, 1 day ago
        I didn't mean to use nuclear weapons on our own soil. If any country sent military units into the United States as part of an invasion, the President (who has sole authority to order use of nuclear weapons) could ensure those troops would have no home to go back to, other than a boiling pool of radioactive glass. As for Democrats inviting UN troops onto US soil, they would have no authority to do that, as "The President" is still Commander in Chief of the US military. Such an over-reach on the part of Democrats (not only being an obvious violation of the Logan Act) would be Treason. Now, for a related question: What if Democrats win the White House (and both houses of Congress) and are then in control of the military, including nuclear weapons? Well, that idiot Eric Swalwell did say that if Americans refuse to surrender our firearms, " ... the government has nukes." In that scenario, I wouldn't put anything past a stinking Democrat. If war comes, there are always casualties on both sides (in fact, there already are - cops have been shot and killed, and Kyle Rittenhouse already bagged two of the enemy - both of whom I hear had lengthy criminal records). I would VERY much like to see a de-escalation, but we have been fighting socialism/communism now for well over half a century, and they aren't going to give up until they are beaten. And we will never give into them. Never. We do "live in interesting times."
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by KevinSchwinkendorf 1 week, 1 day ago
          By the way, regarding the issue of foreign troops on US soil. This happens routinely as we do joint training with other nations' military forces, often on US soil. So, that's why I added the qualifier, " ... as part of an invasion."
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 1 week, 1 day ago
    Yes, NYT traitors, the USA Big Top really needs a wide, wide world of babbling commie clowns to come running in to straighten it out for being rebuilt by the big bad Orange Man.
    Don't forget to also send in the jackass-drawn broke-down clown car stuffed with starving Venezuelans.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 1 week, 1 day ago
    These idiots are Really DEMENTED and RETARDED!...how's LOCAL government doing for ya?...not so great, now is it.
    Do they really think a government further away with even More responsibility will do better?

    Two problems here: 1 They Can't THINK and 2 they have Never been RESPONSIBLE!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by KevinSchwinkendorf 1 week, 1 day ago
      And the democrat mayors and governors who have allowed all the carnage in the big cities still blame ... (drum roll) ... (who else?) ... President Trump! (of course!). Cuomo blames Trump for all the covid deaths in New York, and it was HE (Cuomo, the Executioner) who ordered covid-infected patients to be admitted into nursing homes and assisted-care facilities, explicitly prohibiting covid-testing before hand. I've heard estimates of between 6,000-12,000 deaths were due to this one executive order, and Cuomo blames ... Big Bad Orange Man! Now for the "Rest of the Story" - Cuomo blames CDC guidelines that stated these facilities COULD take covid patients IF THEY COULD ISOLATE THEM FROM THE REST OF THEIR RESIDENTS. Apparently, Cuomo didn't read that far. In fact, these facilities begged the state government to not enforce this policy, because they COULDN'T do the necessary isolation, but their protests were ignored. The death toll might even be higher because of the fraudulent way they are accounting for these deaths. If a nursing home resident tested positive and were then sent to a hospital, and died at the hospital, those deaths were NOT COUNTED as nursing home deaths - only if they died while still at the facility! Cuomo is now simply trying to cover his ass. What a useless idiot!
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by bobsprinkle 1 week ago
    Mr. Beinart's pedigree at the bottom of the article in the NY SLIME could have just been substituted for the entire text of the article.
    Would have saved the time of reading it. He should be sent for a tour of the concentration camps in Germany.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo