EVIDENCE: Some wildfires in California, Oregon were started by ARSON, but the media still LIES

Posted by $ Olduglycarl 1 month ago to Video
15 comments | Share | Flag

Video; 11:08 mins
The media continues to prove Donald Trump's declaration that it's an enemy to American freedom. The mainstream press and the left have been saying for days now that wildfires in California and Oregon are a product of climate change, but Glenn has CLEAR EVIDENCE there's another story that needs to be examined: arson. And, in fact, several of the arsonists charged and arrested were also instigators in BLM rallies, violent protests, and Antifa riots. So what's REALLY going on? It's up to you to always question what you're being told, do your research, and find the truth.
SOURCE URL: https://youtu.be/e4PaZHHOC2M


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by DrZarkov99 4 weeks ago
    Even experts on California's own environmental board have acknowledged the real problem is the neglectful forest management, failing to remove the plentiful fuel in the form of dead trees and underbrush that have made the situation so disastrous. The climate change fanatics don't care about lives lost or homes destroyed. They see wildfires as more evidence they can wave under people's noses to convince them that draconian measures are necessary to prevent these disasters.

    In prehistoric times, scientists estimate that up to 11 million acres of California forest went up in flames each year, so the over 3 million gone this year is no record. However, there are now many more humans occupying the state, which makes it such a burden.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ pixelate 4 weeks ago
    What happens to the arsonist that is found guilty? We can calculate the physical costs in terms of resources destroyed. How is that cost then exacted on the arsonist in terms of a punishment ... as in Crime and Punishment?
    So the arsonist is determined to be broke -- worthless -- but I would beg to differ.
    Two words: Kidneys and Corneas.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 4 weeks ago
      Interesting thought. I always thought that they should be put to work and all their proceeds be put toward the damages they caused. Just like the old days...of course, in this instance, it would take more than a life time to pay up.

      I wanted the justice system to put bernie madoff to work in investments to pay for his crimes while he served his sentence.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 1 month ago
    Message is correct, random lighting of fires is bad.
    Still- no need to get over-excited.

    Fact is many, maybe over half, of these fires (wild, bush, forest) are started by deliberate human action. What matters is the level of danger. Whether or not temperatures are 1 or 2 degrees higher or lower has no effect on ignition or the scale of the fire. The intensity of burn determines the danger.

    There are natural and human causes of danger,
    natural- strong high winds -eg the Santa Anna,
    human- allowing fuel to accumulate,
    California is especially bad by not clearing leaves, branches and dead trees. Some timbers once on fire are next to impossible to put out. The general solution is controlled burns, in Australia and in the California, the indigenous people did this, but now woke ideology says setting forest on fire is sacrilege, except to of course to make a political point.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo