Scientists Have Now Discovered Antibody That ‘Neutralizes’ COVID-19 Virus

Posted by $ Olduglycarl 5 days, 6 hours ago to Science
30 comments | Share | Flag

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine have discovered “the smallest biological molecule” that “completely and specifically neutralizes” SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.

Not Just curing those with the virus but also using it as a preventitive...maybe even better than Hydroxychloraquine.

Hope it works out.

Add Comment


All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by GaryL 4 days, 15 hours ago
    If our eyes had microscopic vision so we could see all the germs all around us all day and every day we would be horrified! Oddly enough, most of us have an immunity system to protect and fight off most of these germs but some are better than others and some germs are tougher that others. I don't believe for one second that this Covid-19 virus is a naturally occurring virus. I do believe this was genetically altered in a lab and in some way either allowed out of the lab either by accident or on purpose. You can all be very sure our government knows the truth about this but we will not be informed. Masks, Lockdowns, Social Distancing and all the other actions are simply government overreach of power and control. All are Unconstitutional from the giddyup.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CaptainKirk 4 days, 15 hours ago
    STATE of the SCIENCE Reflection.

    We have 2 immune systems. One works environmentally cleaning up questionable/infected cells. The other works by targeting the viruses. There are 2 types of targeting. Marking the virus for death, AND doing so while "blocking" the ability of the virus to get into the cells.

    We have the ability to "3D Print" these viruses, nowadays, without leaving the typical "man-made" markers. (This is what they ignore when they claim it is "most likely NOT" man-made. But since we understand how our cells build viruses, given a virus, we basically reverse engineered the process)

    But this gives us something NEW. This also means we can PRINT a cell that binds to the viruses receptors/spikes, etc.
    And this is AMAZING new technology. Now, it's a pretty specific lock and key type system. The magic is getting OUR BODIES to do this as needed. (You don't want a bunch of anti-bodies floating around that you don't need)...

    So, pretty soon, they will be able to PRINT a virus that is relatively harmless (based on an older virus we know), and REFORM it's envelope to match the new virus (Covid spike protein, etc). Replicate this... And use this to INOCULATE people with.

    This is SO MUCH CLEANER than the current process of injecting the virus repeatedly into mouse brains, etc. to "attenuate" the virus. (Which is what Dr. Mikovitz says introduced RT viruses that may be causing cancer and chronic fatigue, etc).


    so, that's the GOOD news...

    Don't worry... The MSM will get their hands on this and only point out the faults (unlike their useless drug which gets high praise)
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 4 days, 14 hours ago
      Didn't think of printing the solution and yes, that would be much cleaner. Nothing to cross the blood brain barrier, no toxins, human parts nor monkey piss,-(laughing).
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 4 days, 22 hours ago
    Has anyone ever wondered why doctors and nurses wear masks in an OR? They are to protect the "patients" from infection. Not the wearer of the mask.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ kddr22 4 days, 20 hours ago
      Surgical masks are designed to stop bacteria not viral particles as well. They will stop at best down to 1 micron. Sars-cov-2 particles are 0.01 to 0.03 microns
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ blarman 4 days, 16 hours ago
      Yes, but consider what a mask mandate implies: that EVERYONE is constantly an infection carrier who is perpetually dangerous to everyone around them. That's an incredibly dangerous and erroneous statement when you break it down. And yet this is precisely the threat to our liberties being raised by fear-mongering and power-hungry politicians.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ gharkness 4 days, 16 hours ago
        See, THIS is the thing I've been talking about elsewhere. Alert, alert! Be Afraid; Be VERY Afraid. Your neighbor can kill you! Grandma's not safe!

        Fighting the disease is not nearly as scary as dealing with the threat laid out by blarman. Some of us are going to die. Maybe a little earlier than we would have otherwise. But the damage that is being done to our young people, IMO, is immeasurable. And I don't just mean little kids....I mean up to adult age. And even beyond.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ 4 days, 16 hours ago
        True, you can't spread it unless you are symptomatic.
        That much of the virus is like other viruses.
        Been digesting an article about viruses that hide and seek in the body...they attack and replicate then go into hiding to attack another day. The Cold virus (crowned like covid) was among the viruses that was studied.
        I have to read it again to see if there is some value in posting it.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by nanovation 4 days, 16 hours ago
      I hate wearing a mask, but there is some logic to wearing one if this virus was killing off 5% to 10% of the population, which it obviously is not.

      The logic behind everyone wearing a mask is that the mask will diminish the amount of virus particles that leaves one person and diminishes the amount of virus particles that enters the next person, thus reducing the viral load you get, thus increasing your chances of it having next to no effect on you as your body has an excellent chance to fight it off since so little got in you in the 1st place.

      The opposite would be everyone going without a mask to a bar where you make out with someone for an hour and end up back home with them where they breathe virus particles in your face all night long.

      THAT would be a MASSIVE first load of virus particles vs a very tiny amount. That massive 1st load could overtax your system if you aren't in perfect health.

      So, I understand the purpose of the masks...if the death rate really was 5% to 10%...but it's obviously not that bad. Here in NC the death rate is 30 per 100,000 people, which is a .03% death rate.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Stormi 2 days, 10 hours ago
    Amazing, but fire Fauci before he says it does not work, then has a pal release it a year later. That is his MO. Where is this little molecule, and what is its usual function? Why have so many people not got the virus as it is? Don't say masks, as that is a crock. Our area has tripled cases just since the DeWine makd mandate. Onl, now it is hitting 20 year olds, not old folks.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 2 days, 9 hours ago
      That's interesting...seems the tests they are using are so sensitive that they detect covid 1984 particles, not whole viruses. Use the weaker test, that requires a significant amount of the virus and I bet you there would be No cases and no deaths attributed to ole covid.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 4 days, 15 hours ago
    Interesting. I wonder how things will work out in a few years looking back.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 4 days, 15 hours ago
      Observations in quantum physics and an experiment done in academia suggests that if the consequences of one's actions, test results or other assumptions are unknown, we could restudy, find our mistakes and change the outcome...wonder if that would work here.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Idiocracy42 4 days, 14 hours ago
        Or, just keep repeating those actions, never learning from our mistakes.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 4 days, 14 hours ago
          I get what you are saying but the experiment was: Can we change the outcome before the consequences, (results) are known. The experiment showed that, (randomly), students that studied "After" taking an exam did better than those that studied before.

          I am wondering if we could do the same thing here because we might suspect what the consequences will be but in reality, we really do not know for sure.
          In other words, can we change the unknown suspected consequences, (most probable) in our favor.

          That would call for a MASSIVE Champagne to inform people of the most probable outcome of their actions and hope they change their actions.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by Idiocracy42 4 days, 14 hours ago
            I know, and my response didn't reflect that.

            Your comment jumped my frustrated brain right to "how is it that we NEVER learn?" If we can't be bothered to even know of, let alone understand, something as obvious and documented as the holocaust, it feels hopeless.

            Which was was completely off the point of your experiment :-(.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  


  • Comment hidden. Undo