CA Democrat Judge rejects tests (SAT, ACT) that measure intelligence and ability for college admissions
Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 8 months ago to Education
The University of California school system must stop using SAT or ACT scores while making admissions and scholarships decisions, a judge ruled Tuesday.
The decision comes in response to a lawsuit filed earlier this year alleging the admittance of such scores during the coronavirus pandemic harmed disabled students who lacked the same test-taking opportunities as non-disabled individuals. Alameda Superior Court Judge Brad Seligman issued a preliminary inunction blocking UC universities from accepting standard test scores in their admissions processes as the complaint is argued in court.
Makes me wonder if the judge's SAT scores were lower than average.
The decision comes in response to a lawsuit filed earlier this year alleging the admittance of such scores during the coronavirus pandemic harmed disabled students who lacked the same test-taking opportunities as non-disabled individuals. Alameda Superior Court Judge Brad Seligman issued a preliminary inunction blocking UC universities from accepting standard test scores in their admissions processes as the complaint is argued in court.
Makes me wonder if the judge's SAT scores were lower than average.
That ended when schools were integrated completely, imo. They didn't have room to hold people back with 20% unable to advance to the next grade. So they graduated millions that are less likely to succeed than before. Teachers only had so much time and schools only had so much money. Eventually the standard of teachers also dropped and the "teaching" went from improving minds to brainwashing opinions. Teachers unions made sure that teachers weren't tested and they weren't advanced on merit.
This judge is obviously ignorant as to what happens when the left gets what it wants.
They eliminate those who made it possible for the takeover of a country.
History, folks, is being made and repeated with the help of stupid people like this judge.
Just sayin'.
Entrepreneur Strike.
My wife was an extremely talented artist in multiple media, managed corporate accounting systems (she had no degree), acted as a general contractor in remodeling four different homes, and designed houses herself, but she most likely would have gotten atrocious SAT scores. She wanted to be a geologist, but realized she couldn't cope with tests that would be given in college. Her brother is a PhD and retired member of the JPL staff, but I still believe she was the smarter of the two.
Employers could test people to determine how smart and educated potential employees are before they get hired. Put the onus on the students to learn what they will need to actually get a job they might want..
Get rid of "teachers" and emphasize the environment that will encourage students to learn . The students themselves will make the reputation of the school once they graduate.
This is not a complete solution, but I just have a feeling at this point that the way we have structured education is really inefficient.
I learn more from YouTube than anything at this point.
To heck with independent smarts. Pliable minds are now in higher demand. Power to the sheeple!
Hey, dino, you're a racist. Shut up, upstart, and sit down.
They also might be acceptable if they have attractive willing children.
"CA Judge blocks technical qualifications for a job as a basis for hiring. Rules that companies must hire whoever applies."
Third paragraph:
"Ruling specifically excludes the entertainment industry, as clearly providing necessary service while only discriminating against ugly people, who are not a protected class."
As to the worth of tests and data in general, I am a fan of JJ Cowperthwaite in this, could be a subject for a thread. The problem remains, how do you select? Current wokism says- on measures of disadvantage, or need, or on how you like the applicant in an interview. Old China selected on the ability to write verse, fair?
I would still give the weight of decision to SAT / ACT or such tests.
If there are any people left, they are shrugging or are already in Galt’s Gulch.
Whatever else they do measure, the ACT and SAT do not measure intellgence, nor were they designed to or intended do. They measure how well you paid attention in high school.
I eagerly await a court ruling that bulk is not to be used in selecting footballers, and for basketball height measurements are discriminatory against the vertically challenged community who are obviously under-represented in those sports.