I was at GT about that same time. Women there were a small minority, but equality wasn't an issue. We weren't uniformly talented, but all there on our merit as judged by SAT's and HS records. We were all striving, learning according to our abilities. Some professors may have been surprised by the women, but not the students.

I'll bet if you put a male brain and a female brain on the table you couldn't tell them apart. Same thing for ethnicity.

RBG's one big flaw was that she couldn't understand she was supposed to enforce the Constitution, not "interpret" it to her liking.

I seem to really like one of the choices and think we are switching the pendulum from far laeft,to A more ,humane governing capacity, irregardless of incongruent and inept progressive idealogical dart throwing governing

Graduating legions of people with degrees in "women's studies" and "black studies" has encouraged foolish, ignorant, brainwashed people to support socialist organizations and destruction of property, too. Now those people are mired in debt with no hope for productive employment and with a mindset that white males have cheated them of their equality of outcome.

Amazing!! As a woman who entered UVA engineering in 1972, I completely understand how promotion of minorities and females based on quotas with little or no regard for qualifications has set women back years!!! It does a disservice to ALL who do have qualifications. Equal rights cannot be legislated.

To be fair, the ones who were picked were picked by Democrats to be activists. If you pick someone with a record of actually reading the constitution it would be different.

Trump should think very long and hard before recommending another minority female to the court.
So far every minority female on the court has been a traitor to America and an enemy of the constitution.