Subverting Santa Claus
I was thinking of started a more expanded thread entitled, "Christmas in the Gulch" wherein I began by questioning how Christmas could work in the Gulch, but decided that it's too far from Christmas for that (my store had its Christmas merchandise coming in in September...)
But something occurred to me last night that I felt compelled to share...
My first thought was, "Santa doesn't fit into the objectivist view of things; he travels the world giving away gifts"
But it's not Santa's fault. When I was a kid, Santa *was* trading value for value when he made his Christmas run.
See, I was taught, as were my siblings and peers, that you only got gifts if you were good; the better you did, the better/more gifts he would bring. Keep your room clean, obey dad and mom, clean your plate, get good grades, all could earn you better presents from Santa.
And, of course, if you behaved badly enough, he would bring you a lump of coal.
That's trading value for value. In exchange for the behavior he desires (for whatever reason) he offers material objects the kids desire.
Nowadays, I suspect the good behavior aspect has been removed, turning everyone's kid into a moocher.
(And let's not get into a big debate as to the existence and nature of Santa Claus, for the sake of parents who may have little ones reading over their shoulder...)
But something occurred to me last night that I felt compelled to share...
My first thought was, "Santa doesn't fit into the objectivist view of things; he travels the world giving away gifts"
But it's not Santa's fault. When I was a kid, Santa *was* trading value for value when he made his Christmas run.
See, I was taught, as were my siblings and peers, that you only got gifts if you were good; the better you did, the better/more gifts he would bring. Keep your room clean, obey dad and mom, clean your plate, get good grades, all could earn you better presents from Santa.
And, of course, if you behaved badly enough, he would bring you a lump of coal.
That's trading value for value. In exchange for the behavior he desires (for whatever reason) he offers material objects the kids desire.
Nowadays, I suspect the good behavior aspect has been removed, turning everyone's kid into a moocher.
(And let's not get into a big debate as to the existence and nature of Santa Claus, for the sake of parents who may have little ones reading over their shoulder...)
If you goto the Atlas Society and enter "Christmas" in the search box, you will be rewarded with several hits, including this one:
"The Human Spirit of Christmas" by Ed Hudgins
http://www.atlassociety.org/human-spirit...
For myself, holidays are pretty much rooted in the weather and the calendar, and they remain, even as cultures come and go. Solstice and Equinox are easy. The Fourth of July is always a good reason to celebrate. Take your pick of Labor Days, but I go with May 1, comrade and leave that other one to the opening of the Jewish Fall Fashion Season -- speaking of which, how about Purim and/or Halloween?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHNBr3PZQ...
So I just went back to the living room to listen to Santa and Mom talk about legal issues. He thankfully didn't invite her to get on his lap. The kids were excited just at the notion of some weird guy in the house, and Mom and Dad made a friend.
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/pictures/view...
http://www.investors.com/editorial-carto...
We would have Christmas, because we'd want to. (If you didn't want to...then you'd stay home of your own free will.) I think Eud needs to get a Santa outfit though. ho ho ho (Hey....Ricky can be an Elf!.... ) ;)
I've stopped writing "Who is John Galt?" in obscure places at work btw. Some jerk from the day shift goes behind me and writes underneath "... a fictional character." So I wrote under one of them, "So's Obama..."
Load more comments...