There has never been a more serious crime in American history. Not just an attempted coup, it is a window into the inner-workings of a secret government operating independently within the state.
Posted by freedomforall 3 years, 7 months ago to Politics
Recap:
1. The Democrats knew there was no proof the emails were stolen; thus, they knew the Russia probe was a hoax.
2. The Democrats knew that their fraudulent “opposition research” was being used to illegally obtain warrants to spy on the Trump camp. This makes them accessory to a crime.
3. Finally, the Democrats continue to spread (virtually) the same Russia-Trump collusion allegations today that they did before the Mueller investigation released its report. The lies and disinformation have persisted as if the “nation’s most expensive and exhaustive investigation” had never taken place. What does this tell us about the Democrats?
On a superficial level, it tells us that they can’t be trusted because they don’t tell the truth. But on a deeper level, it expresses the party’s Ruling Doctrine, which is to control the public by means of deceit, disinformation, propaganda and lies. Only the powerful and well-connected are entitled to know the truth, everyone else must be subjected to fabrications that are crafted in a way that best coincides with the overall objectives of ruling elites.
1. The Democrats knew there was no proof the emails were stolen; thus, they knew the Russia probe was a hoax.
2. The Democrats knew that their fraudulent “opposition research” was being used to illegally obtain warrants to spy on the Trump camp. This makes them accessory to a crime.
3. Finally, the Democrats continue to spread (virtually) the same Russia-Trump collusion allegations today that they did before the Mueller investigation released its report. The lies and disinformation have persisted as if the “nation’s most expensive and exhaustive investigation” had never taken place. What does this tell us about the Democrats?
On a superficial level, it tells us that they can’t be trusted because they don’t tell the truth. But on a deeper level, it expresses the party’s Ruling Doctrine, which is to control the public by means of deceit, disinformation, propaganda and lies. Only the powerful and well-connected are entitled to know the truth, everyone else must be subjected to fabrications that are crafted in a way that best coincides with the overall objectives of ruling elites.
Apart from some details the theme here is correct tho' understated.
In the article two types of threat are defined.
Type 2 threat has wording:
" gathering damaging information that "
But, what happened was that one person got another to make up stories, the stories were then leaked as if fact.
The wording should have said:
"creating malicious fabrications that when supposedly leaked "
It is possible to argue with the type 1 threat but that is another story.