Why not Indict "Don Obama" With The RICO Act?
The RICO Act made Mafia crime bosses as guilty for ordered crimes committed by their paid goons.
Why not use that method to work indictments for various criminal acts all the way to the top to the former president me dino used to refer to the Liar-In-Chief?
Why not use that method to work indictments for various criminal acts all the way to the top to the former president me dino used to refer to the Liar-In-Chief?
The rest of us are Tier 2. We're the ones in prison if we're caught spitting on the sidewalk or wearing a mask wrong--or not wearing one,
Gotti was right when he said America would miss the Mafia, as they loved the USA, band the oligarchy would leave us longing for the Mafia.
it is going to be biblical.
A more realistic course is with the high crimes and misdemeanors being committed by the current Twit. But then you have a senate full of Capos and lessor bosses to charge and the list climbs into the hundreds due public hanging for treasons.
Cutting the head off the current snake wouldn't have much effect.
Good entertaining article though. Funny read in a Monday morning. But I have to go to work now.
There is the possibility that Obama may decide he's untouchable, and do something that is patently and obviously illegal. In that circumstance any rational person would have to admit he should face the consequences, but the supply of rational people seems deficient of late.
I find it frightening at the similarities and her prescience. I am only hoping that the fate of the looters, moochers, and the anti-thinkers suffer fates befitting the behaviors.
During the first and the more extended Napoleonic War, the "Forlorn Hope" was what Brit soldiers called volunteering to be among the first crew to attack the breach (often the only entrance with shot-away by cannonballs gates)
of a fort or castle.
The forlorn hope was for the high honors, monetary awards and promotions for the very few who lived through spearheading the attack.
Back in those days soldiers were not honored for getting killed. They became a name added to what was called "the Butcher's Bill."
Every law/rule/action is an experiment (social experiment). It is an attempt to prove a hypothesis. Since there are not generally good "controls", it remains even more important that the desired outcome is 1) measurable and 2) evaluated against the hypothesis it was voted in for. People who voted for/supported/unilaterally instituted it should be held accountable for the evaluated outcome. If it didn't support the hypothesis, it should be reversed automatically. War against Poverty is a perfect example. It would never have survived based on the outcome hypothesized when voted in.
I must have been thinking of someone like Justice Roberts or Mittens when I put "RINO" in the title.
Fortunately, I could fix that after clicking on "Edit."
Then turn the traitorous bastard and execute the Clintons and all the "just following orders" minions for treason.
(Didn't you mean RICO? )