The comment has been deleted.

Should we have a process to appeal being banned.

Posted by Mitch 5 years ago to Ask the Gulch
19 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Ether this board has an automated routine to ban members with too many down votes or this board isn’t administrated by an objectivist; ether case, it isn't supporting free speech. I'm guessing the Ewe has multiple accounts to down vote posts he doesn't like as it was very systematic. The down voting didn't seem organic at all. I did nothing wrong, we should have a process to protest this action.

All of this is because of why? no explanation whatsoever. I’m guessing it’s because I created a separate thread so EWE could argue his assertion that the Corona virus was real and not a bunch of hooey (link provided for Ewe, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dicti.... The thread I created was to surmise at the motivation for the false numbers generated to inflate the severity of the corona virus.

Somehow, I’ve been punished when Ewe is the one down voting all of my posts. I simply returned the favor… I didn’t tell him to go to hell, I simply told him after he questioned my objectivity to find another thread then I created that thread for him. That seems pretty nice to me, am I wrong?

I think the administrators of the board should investigate the down voting and revers the ban for Dobrien and myself.


All Comments

  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 4 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Now this is getting scary...are we sure this isn't the twilight zone?...or just a bad dream.
    Hope you delete it...I might need it.
    I might be canned just for starting a serious conversation...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Comment deleted.
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 4 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Now I am confused...Mitch 2 posted the comment...something strange goin on here...maybe we could have a DOB2?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 4 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    WOW...now that comment shows up...maybe as of 42 minutes ago...your back.
    If that's so then we should try to get Dan back as well.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 4 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Mitch, I would say settle down a bit. Objectivisim is not Conservatism, and it was pointed out to me that Ayn Rand hated Conservatism as much as Liberalism. The one thing to know is they will not allow people to do anything to other people, like bait them. ewv will never be able to have a discussion about conservative ideas, especially when you consider they are nowhere near as refined as the Objectivists think their philosophy is. Atlas Shrugged had a great appeal because it presents the tyranny of government, but it is not a conservative philosophy that was behind it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by $ nickursis 5 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Why doe nothing come up when I click on your name Mitch, what crime did you commit? This is getting irksome...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 5 years ago
    Important alert: Still no comments by admin, someone else needed for this conversation.

    I would ask all, to send admin a note then share your thoughts on this subject and support or not, a reprieve or commutation of Dan/ Dobrien's acceptance back into the Gulch.
    I think John Galt would be in support of Dan seeing that he is a valued Creator.

    Seems ewe has exited that conversation...I thought I could make some headway.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 5 years ago
    Request for information sent to the Administrators
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo