MEMES UP, Buddy

Now when I looked at that ref it struck me as quite negative, but on looking again at that sentence (allowing off-label) I think there is an explanation.
-Words drop from Olympus, lower levels catch a meaning as serious and urgent, so a task force is rounded up to report, there are three members, two write the stuff and the third who knows even less that the other two compiles the material into a report.
Not likely you may say? Have you worked for governments?
What this means is that a court will decide.

I think it also prevents use of the Strategic National Stockpile for COVID patients which probably means less supply, higher prices and more profits for big pharma.

freedomforall
"The removal of the “approval” actually lets more HCQ be used.
The approval in fact only approved use once hospitalized and prevented other use. Now HCQ is back under simple off label use rules as before. Any medical doctor can now prescribe it as they see fit.”

This view from-
https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2020/06...

From the quote you provided, second from last para, last sentence-
Of note, FDA approved products may be prescribed by physicians for off-label uses if they determine it is appropriate for treating their patients, including during COVID.

My question was largely rhetorical, and I agree with your answer.

It is NOT possible to survive in the politically world if you are philosophically consistent.

All these alphabet agencies stick together, and seem to favor China. In this case, Fauci does not want it used, because he has a pal who has the next chosen remedy, and who knows what perks that might mean if he could get that as chosen treatment. Never forget most of these folks have money in that Chinese lab, millions, and nothing wold be better than a second drop of the virus to further one world gov. and make a few richer. It certainly is nto about what works for everyday taxpayers, whose taxes are indirectly funding the virus spread.

Is it possible to be both philosophically consistent and survive in the political realm?

I am hoping for 4 years anyway of having trump stand in the way of collectivism (to a degree anyway). After that, I think all bets are off, as there isnt someone willing to take on collectivism to the degree Trump has.

I hope you have more than 5 years, term2! I know what you mean, though, because I figure 15 or 20 left for me and I want what's left of free USA to hang in there until I assume room temperature.

Oh, and I want to add - in case you didn't know. If you get injured by this vaccine that they are going to force on you there is really no legal recourse. Two different federal laws (one in 1986 just before the CDC Childhood Vaccine Schedule went from a few vaccines to about 70, and The Patriot Act) don't allow manufacturers of vaccines to ever be sued for any damages. Good luck with that. Oh, you can file a complaint with a Federal Vaccine Injury Court. And, they've handed out billion$ now in sealed settlements while saying publicly that vaccines are totally safe. See how that works? Yeah...you see it, too.

Oh, the profits... If you aren't familiar with the subject of moral hazard now is the time to learn. Before there was AIG and Big Auto the vaccine industry was the first "too big to fail".

But don't worry. On this one topic - health - you can trust big government.

...I should write that book...

...So people can make money. Get ready to roll up that sleeve, buddy. This one will be forced more than any other. The stock to buy is Moderna - in case you want in on the action.

(bad humor there, sorry)

I agree. He is unfortunately very intellectually inconsistent, and it kicks him in the ass every time.

Or do an Ellis Wyatt, and just go on strike

A really good vaccine will be commandeered by governments as a national security issue. I would steer clear of it.

Ventilator support makes a lot of money for hospitals. Why use cheaper modalities to treat kung flu

My experience has been they are stupid bureaucrats who are lacking in basic knowledge.

Now theres a good one. I would vote for THAT one in a second.

I just went and did other things that they didnt have a chance to contol YET. AS was very accurate in where the country is going. I have maybe 5 years left on this earth, and hopefully the end of times wont happen until later

Sarcasm. You are obviously not a member of the club that has closed its membership to newcomers. Try selling your ideas or try to cut a deal with an existing member. To indulge in crony capitalism you have to be a crony.

{{KNOWINGLY}} ..... They could have a tsunami of lawsuits if the FDA is found culpable. These people are sick.

Yes, I hope they have great lawyers and deep pockets, and I wish them great success.

I quit designing medical equipment BECAUSE of the FDA. You had to get their approval in advance in order to sell any medical device, and they took months and months to even decide IF you got approval. And this was after you did all the work to design and build the produciton facilities and get ready to mass produce it.

Thanks, don't think I ran into that one in my research.

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) has filed a lawsuit against the heads of the FDA, HHS and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) over what they call “irrational interference” to limit the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for treating COVID-19 patients.Jun 8, 2020.