

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
-Words drop from Olympus, lower levels catch a meaning as serious and urgent, so a task force is rounded up to report, there are three members, two write the stuff and the third who knows even less that the other two compiles the material into a report.
Not likely you may say? Have you worked for governments?
What this means is that a court will decide.
"The removal of the “approval” actually lets more HCQ be used.
The approval in fact only approved use once hospitalized and prevented other use. Now HCQ is back under simple off label use rules as before. Any medical doctor can now prescribe it as they see fit.”
This view from-
https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2020/06...
From the quote you provided, second from last para, last sentence-
Of note, FDA approved products may be prescribed by physicians for off-label uses if they determine it is appropriate for treating their patients, including during COVID.
Oh, the profits... If you aren't familiar with the subject of moral hazard now is the time to learn. Before there was AIG and Big Auto the vaccine industry was the first "too big to fail".
But don't worry. On this one topic - health - you can trust big government.
...I should write that book...
(bad humor there, sorry)
Load more comments...