Doctors Sue FDA, HHS Over Hydroxychloroquine Restrictions
"Entrenched, politically biased officials at the FDA should not be allowed to interfere with Americans' right to access medication donated to the federal government for public use," Schlafly says. "By preventing Americans' use of HCQ as a prophylaxis, the FDA is infringing on First Amendment rights to attend religious services or participate in political events such as political conventions, town halls, and rallies in an important election year."
"FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn states that the FDA does not interfere with physicians' ability to prescribe HCQ, and yet at the same time the FDA denies access by millions of Americans to 150 million doses of it in the national stockpile," Schlafly adds. "This irrational hoarding by government is an abuse of power."
"FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn states that the FDA does not interfere with physicians' ability to prescribe HCQ, and yet at the same time the FDA denies access by millions of Americans to 150 million doses of it in the national stockpile," Schlafly adds. "This irrational hoarding by government is an abuse of power."
https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post...
nickusis says it was intentional.
My take is that while 'no intent' may be technically correct, the decision was 'culpable'. Death resulted from those decisions.
The decision makers were not laymen or bystanders, they had responsibility for the oldies under their care, they should have evaluated the consequences. They did not, I think in legal language this means not murder but manslaughter.
If you want to argue for incompetence, then show us examples by which the same people who interfered with HCQ for the USA citizenry did things that, by their own standards, caused harm and that were mistakes. Do so, and I will be convinced. If not, it's malice.
The elderly being the most fatally endangered by the Covid-19 pandemic, where should you put Covid-19 patients?
Why, shucks--a-huck! a-huck!--I know. I know whar thar be plenty o' space. Let's jes' stick 'em inter dem nursin' homes o'er that aways. Yep!
A-huck! A-huck! Problem solved. Fer rocket science smarts, am I not ther cock o' the walk or whut?
I could not find the number of members, a class of non-medic membership is available at no charge.
Expect their public profile to come under attack by the usual activists claiming they are: Science deniers, radicals, use anecdotal evidence, irresponsible, put money over human life, libertarians, Trump supporters, and are far right, extreme right, hard right, at some stage they will be called 'racist'.
Related news: the UN agency controlled by China, the WHO, (where the H stands for 'health' would you believe) is putting the hard word on Indonesia to ban HCQ.
We can expect a surprise malaria epidemic as those doctors who insist on treating patients properly start diagnosing malaria on trivial or counterfeit evidence so that they can prescribe HCQ to their patients.
Oh, well, such a reaction has come to be fully ex[ected. Trump has said that, even if he ever cured cancer, he would be attacked for putting a whole bunch of medical specialists out of business.